A Conservative Case for Gay Marriage - Promoting American Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter WinterBorn
  • Start date Start date
Gay people have not been allowed to marry so how do we know the rate of Promiscuity of married gay people?

When I was single I was very Promiscuous, now that I am married I am monogoumous.
 
WinterBorn said:
Catholics certainly provide plenty of ammunition for bashing. But since we are discussing laws in the US, and the US Constitution forbids making laws based solely on a single religion's dogma, catholics are irrelevant too.
Click to expand...
As predicted, not addressed:

Far higher rates of promiscuity are observed even within 'committed' gay relationships than in heterosexual marriage: In Holland, male homosexual relationships last, on average, 1.5 years, and gay men have an average of eight partners a year outside of their supposedly “committed” relationships. (Xiridou M, et al. The contribution of steady and casual partnerships to the incidence of HIV infection among homosexual men in Amsterdam. AIDS. 2003; 17: 1029-38.) Gay men have sex with someone other than their primary partner in 66% of relationships within the first year, rising to 90% of relationships after five years. (Harry J. Gay Couples. New York. 1984)
Click to expand...

http://www.catholiceducation.org/art...ty/ho0095.html
 
Jarod said:
1) Based on it being a mathematical concept, whats wrong with being abnormal, out of the range of a mathematical concept?
2) How does someone elses marriage affect mine? If my neighbor cheats on his wife it does not affect my marriage.
3) Its name calling, just like Ni**er, just some use it to refer to themselves does not make it right.
Click to expand...

1. I never said it was, just don't lie about it.
2. As explained earlier, the degradation of marriage by all these factors has a negative impact on the institution of marriage.
3. Except "queer" as a descriptive term has a legitimate English definition while your example does not.
 
Cypress said:
Calm down bro’, and don’t stress out about people who you don’t even know. I mean you actually went to the trouble of researching how much sex gay people are having. Bizarre.

...
Click to expand...
Actually, I quoted from a summary about others paid to study these things in order to defend my debate position. Odd that you would suddenly interject here and accuse me of some perversion; perhaps this speaks more of you then it does The Southern Man.
 
SM, you try and maintain that the points you bringup are relevant.

But straights are promiscuous, its may be that gays are more promiscuous, but that doesn't say much.

Promiscuity is not a reason to deny marriage rights & benefits.
 
Even if its not "natural" to be gay (which I do not agree) so what. Its not natural to have a shaved face....
 
CaptBillyTheKid said:
I once again find it odd that you only reference and talk about homosexual men and their promiscuity, completely ignoring lesbians.
Click to expand...

Thats because lesbians have the lowest rates of promiscuity and the lowest rates of STDs.

So by SM's reasoning, they should be allowed to marry and straights should not.
 
WinterBorn said:
Dodging the question again?

You commented about what you think the gals should do, so I simply asked what you think the guys should do. And you post another bit about queers poking each other. Talk about a serious fixation.


You want women to abstain from sex until marriage. What about the men?
Click to expand...
lol....and if the women have all abstained who is left for the men to have sex with?......obviously he didn't dodge the question....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top