QP!
Verified User
lol
you people are mandating it.
how delusional are you?
charging stations still must be on the grid, a grid that uses ICE.
you're a moron.
Look, what i know is for almost 100 years ICE vehicle have had the gov't behind them, 'picking winners and losers' by over a hundred years of direct and indirect subsidies and bailouts to Oil and gas and ICE manufacturers.
And you guys did not GAF about that CONSTANT gov't intervention on behalf of ICE. So your tears now are delicious. NOthing makes me happier than seeing Magats cry crocodile tears when faced with what they supported or cheered on prior.
No one is saying EV's will not use the grid involves fossil fuels. This is about progression OVER TIME, and this pretense that it has to be a wholesale switch (all or none) on day 1 is just stupid Magat thought. PROGRESS is best in increments as the cost can be lowered and absorbed as the technology improves. think of the early Internet roll out and then broadband after. If they tried to roll it out equally to every rural community it would have been deeply unprofitable and caused bankruptcies. Thus they focused on big cities first (economies of scale) and as the tech improved and the cost came down they spread out to rural communities.
Similarly EV's and EV networks will rely less and less on Fossil fuel grid supply as battery tech improves and green energy sources continue to both become more numerous and the tech for those improves increasing capture and storage.
The problem we have is incredibly stupid Magats like Terry, who continue to argue that if the 'benefits/improvements to tech/lower cost/etc' do not exist TODAY, they will never come', which is defied by pretty much 100% of all prior big tech advancements (PC, INternet, Telephone, TV, ICE vehicles, etc), where the initial rollouts where expensive and only a small percent of the populace could access them and that changed OVER TIME, as tech improved with scale and investment.
Anyone arguing EV and Battery and Green Energy tech will not follow that same path, despite the massive amount of Investments betting they will, has the onus on them to make that 'outlier' argument.