Americans Pinched as Electricity Costs Hit All-Time Highs

Dear Doc Dutch,


My dear fellow !! However are you going to afford the cost of running your electric dildo? I mean using one of those big suckers 12 hours a day (like you do) will soon drain your savings account completely !


But don't despair; there is a new, solar-powered, vibrating, electric dildo that has just been released on the US market. It's called the "Sunny Jim" and is available in a range of sizes: 6"; 8"and 10." (There is 12" model but a Physician's certificate is required to purchase it).


The only down-side is that the device is only really operational out-doors in direct sunlight. What you do is strap the dildo's solar panels across your back, then go to a sunny patch in your garden, drop your trousers and bend over (like you're in San Francisco and about to lay a "Richard the Third" on the sidewalk), then insert the solar- powered dildo, and in about 5 minutes "Bob's Your Uncle." You'll be enjoying a guaranteed 2000Hz of vibration right up the old "Gary Glitter."


If you do decide to invest in one of these solar-powered units, just remember, Doctor, they are not to be used anywhere outside your own garden, that is, not in any public places.




Dachshund - the WONDER HOUND

DLM.... Dachshund Lives Matter !!

Gary Glitter, priceless!
 
Thanks for admitting they are man-made pollution contributing to global warming. :thup:

It's much better than watching you go off on a Chemtrail conspiracy theory. LOL


5880555976_f6797844f5_b.jpg_(1024%C3%97536)-20110728-081824.jpg

No, what I admitted to is that we--humans--don't know for sure if we are contributing, but if we are it isn't primarily CO2 that we produce is the cause. What anthropogenic climate change amounts to is a massive McNamara fallacy based on a Ludic fallacy. That is, the unknown, unknowns aren't even considered while what we do know only takes into account quantifiable data that is so incomplete as to be nearly irrelevant.

"Climate science" on the Left is much like the various churches in ancient history where the center of the universe was Earth and everything revolved around it. It's the same sort of thinking.

A century ago, we didn't know what the bottom of the planet's oceans looked like. Plate tectonics was an unknown. Edwin Hubble discovered the first other galaxy to our own in 1924. Do you really think that scientists who act as much on politics and money as good research really have this CO2 thing down right? They fucked up on CFC's and the ozone hole, so their track record isn't exactly stellar (pun intended). Their predictions on Gorebal Warming have been close to 100% wrong. Hell, a psychic for $100 could probably give you better predictions.

Yet, you buy into everything these tards are saying.
 
No, what I admitted to is that we--humans--don't know for sure if we are contributing, but if we are it isn't primarily CO2 that we produce is the cause. What anthropogenic climate change amounts to is a massive McNamara fallacy based on a Ludic fallacy. That is, the unknown, unknowns aren't even considered while what we do know only takes into account quantifiable data that is so incomplete as to be nearly irrelevant.

"Climate science" on the Left is much like the various churches in ancient history where the center of the universe was Earth and everything revolved around it. It's the same sort of thinking.

A century ago, we didn't know what the bottom of the planet's oceans looked like. Plate tectonics was an unknown. Edwin Hubble discovered the first other galaxy to our own in 1924. Do you really think that scientists who act as much on politics and money as good research really have this CO2 thing down right? They fucked up on CFC's and the ozone hole, so their track record isn't exactly stellar (pun intended). Their predictions on Gorebal Warming have been close to 100% wrong. Hell, a psychic for $100 could probably give you better predictions.

Yet, you buy into everything these tards are saying.
^^^
Calls NASA "tards". Who here is really crazy? LOL

How long before you go over the edge like Micawber or Pmp?
 
You're free to bet their well being on it, Terry. I'd recommend a little more caution. Science-based, of course. Like from NASA and the NOAA. :)

You know that's an irrational comment because it's unprovable for over a 100 years?

Science is not a government agency, Sock.
 
NASA among other places.

How Airplane Contrails Are Helping Make the Planet Warmer
https://e360.yale.edu/features/how-airplane-contrails-are-helping-make-the-planet-warmer

Contrails: How tweaking flight plans can help the climate
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-58769351

Climate Effects of Contrails Confirmed

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-effects-of-contra/

Improved Contrail and Contrail Cirrus Formation and Dissipation Forecasts for Climate Change Mitigation
https://appliedsciences.nasa.gov/wh...il-cirrus-formation-and-dissipation-forecasts

Depending on who you ask, anything up to about 20% of anthropogenic climate change could be caused by contrails. Yet, nothing is being done to mitigate them.

Methane is another issue with up to 30% of climate change due to it.

The science on atmosphere and these so-called greenhouse gasses is so dubious that CO2 could be a minor source rather than "the" source of anthropogenic climate change. The science is anything but "settled."

Climate cannot change.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. Not contrails, not water vapor, not CO2, not methane, not ANYTHING.

You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Science isn't a magazine, radio network, college, university, or government agency. There is no 'science of greenhouse gases'.
 
Thanks for admitting they are man-made pollution contributing to global warming. :thup:

It's much better than watching you go off on a Chemtrail conspiracy theory. LOL


5880555976_f6797844f5_b.jpg_(1024%C3%97536)-20110728-081824.jpg

YOU are going off on a contrail conspiracy theory, Sock.
Contrails are not capable of warming the Earth.
 
No, what I admitted to is that we--humans--don't know for sure if we are contributing, but if we are it isn't primarily CO2 that we produce is the cause. What anthropogenic climate change amounts to is a massive McNamara fallacy based on a Ludic fallacy. That is, the unknown, unknowns aren't even considered while what we do know only takes into account quantifiable data that is so incomplete as to be nearly irrelevant.

"Climate science" on the Left is much like the various churches in ancient history where the center of the universe was Earth and everything revolved around it. It's the same sort of thinking.

A century ago, we didn't know what the bottom of the planet's oceans looked like. Plate tectonics was an unknown. Edwin Hubble discovered the first other galaxy to our own in 1924. Do you really think that scientists who act as much on politics and money as good research really have this CO2 thing down right? They fucked up on CFC's and the ozone hole, so their track record isn't exactly stellar (pun intended). Their predictions on Gorebal Warming have been close to 100% wrong. Hell, a psychic for $100 could probably give you better predictions.

Yet, you buy into everything these tards are saying.

CO2 has no capability to warm the Earth. The effect is exactly ZERO.
 
Thanks for admitting they are man-made pollution contributing to global warming. :thup:

It's much better than watching you go off on a Chemtrail conspiracy theory. LOL

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth, Sock. No one brought up 'chemtrails' either (other than YOU).
 
Science is not a government agency, Sock. NASA is not a Holy Oracle either.

It isn't even NASA but GISS aka Goddard Institute for Space Studies which has nothing to do with Robert Goddard or indeed Space Studies. Their work is mostly climate modelling, precious little empirical science is performed if any.
 
Climate cannot change.
No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. Not contrails, not water vapor, not CO2, not methane, not ANYTHING.

You cannot create energy out of nothing.

Science isn't a magazine, radio network, college, university, or government agency. There is no 'science of greenhouse gases'.

Mantra 48 Psychotic Buffoonery

Mantra 1a.
Mantra 4a.
One of the "miscellaneous" documents on that site is Into the Night's mantra list.
 
Back
Top