Federal judge rules on new Arizona voting laws requiring proof of citizenship

The issue, of course, is that there is no free national citizenship ID. Requiring someone to purchase a passport to vote is a clear violation of the 15th amendment. A drivers license establishes citizenship in the jurisdiction in which you are voting. Arizona cannot require any other ID. It's just more stupidity addressing a non-existent problem.

No, a drivers license does not establish citizenship.

California gives drivers licenses to illegals and they are still illegals.

You are stupid.
 
Non citizens do vote and they do commit felonies.

In some states, Minnesota prime example, where George Soros installed his first secretary of state, Mark Ritchie, Minnesota democrats passed a law where one person can vouch for up to 12 people and they can then be registered at the polls and vote that day. (that has since been pared down to 8)

https://www.amazon.com/stores/Dan McGrath/author/B082J8FG84


Indeed.

Illegals are now voting in local elections and some illegals are voting in national elections.
 
It takes weeks, sometimes months to get a passport. Poor people don't keep files with their birth certificates. This law does discriminate against poor people and people of color. It will be interesting to see where this goes on appeal.

So let me get this straight. You are saying that poor people in general and People of color are too stupid to save important paperwork in a drawer? Wow! You LWers are so racist its sickening!
 
Nope, you idiot. I didn't give credit for citizenship but for being a registered voter.
Which makes you an accessory to a felony, jackass.
These girls did not vote and were not illegal. I did not encourage them to register.
Yes you did. Don't try to deny your own posts, jackass. ANYONE can read them.
A person who is not qualified to be a registered voter in Texas simply has their registration canceled. It is not a felony or crime if they don't vote.
WRONG. It's a felony under current Texas law, punishable by up to 20 years.
And you have openly admitted to being an accessory to a felony crime.
 
LurchAddams said:
It takes weeks, sometimes months to get a passport. Poor people don't keep files with their birth certificates. This law does discriminate against poor people and people of color. It will be interesting to see where this goes on appeal.

Read AZ law, idiot. AZ does NOT require someone to get a passport to register to vote. The law does not discriminate either, racist.
 
So let me get this straight. You are saying that poor people in general and People of color are too stupid to save important paperwork in a drawer? Wow! You LWers are so racist its sickening!

I'd say people of color and poor people aren't the only ones who neglect to retain their paperwork. It's people of color and poor people who can't take time off work to go to the hospital and request the paperwork. Even worse, what if they were born outside of a hospital, like by midwife?

Also, go fuck yourself, you trumptard bitch.
 
I'd say people of color and poor people aren't the only ones who neglect to retain their paperwork. It's people of color and poor people who can't take time off work to go to the hospital and request the paperwork. Even worse, what if they were born outside of a hospital, like by midwife?

Also, go fuck yourself, you trumptard bitch.

Not my fault you guys are so racist. Work on it,.... be better.
 
Obviously unconstitutional per the 15th amendment.

Obviously not per Article II of the Constitution.

You might want to have one of the grownups, read and explain the 15th Amendment, as you are clearly clueless as to what it says.
 
Congress does NOT have the authority to allow non-citizens to vote, jackass. Nor to prevent any State from demanding proof of citizenship to register to vote.

Non-sequitur. Nobody said Congress can allow non-citizens to vote. You argue about points nobody made.

Some states did not require citizenship to vote and about 1994 Congress used the above power to require citizenship for voting in federal elections.
 
Non-sequitur. Nobody said Congress can allow non-citizens to vote. You argue about points nobody made.

Some states did not require citizenship to vote and about 1994 Congress used the above power to require citizenship for voting in federal elections.

This is the pertinent point you seem to have missed :

" Nor to prevent any State from demanding proof of citizenship to register to vote."
 
The issue, of course, is that there is no free national citizenship ID. Requiring someone to purchase a passport to vote is a clear violation of the 15th amendment. A drivers license establishes citizenship in the jurisdiction in which you are voting. Arizona cannot require any other ID. It's just more stupidity addressing a non-existent problem.

I have registered voters. When they register, they have to show proof of citizenship and ID.
ID can be a problem for older voters and non drivers. When I needed a new birth certificate to get a passport it was a big deal. The hospital where I was born closed and merged with others over time. The records were paperwork, not moved to a computer by then. It took me a few visits and time to obtain.
 
You idiot. They did not come into the country illegally (for the third time); therefore, they broke no law.
Yes they did. They registered to vote. Further, the discussion is about illegal immigrants. Don't try to pivot.
They did not commit election fraud. They did not vote.
That is election fraud. It's a felony. You encouraged it. That makes you an accessory to a felony.
 
Non-sequitur.
Fallacy fallacy.
Nobody said Congress can allow non-citizens to vote.
You did, liar. You cannot deny your own posts. ANYONE can read them!
You argue about points nobody made.
YOU made them!
Some states did not require citizenship to vote and about 1994 Congress used the above power to require citizenship for voting in federal elections.
Pivot fallacy. The discussion is about Arizona law (and now Texas law) and illegal immigrants. Pivoting won't work, Dim.
 
Back
Top