IF, as the Colorado AG claimed it was "insurrection," it would indeed be criminal. But then this was not based on a trial or law at all, just the desire of the National Socialist democrats to crush free and fair elections.
An educatonal piece... Criminal Law v. Civil Law.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
IF, as the Colorado AG claimed it was "insurrection," it would indeed be criminal. But then this was not based on a trial or law at all, just the desire of the National Socialist democrats to crush free and fair elections.
Lib Opinion Law
Legally a rapist.
Not criminally guilty, but a rapist as a matter of law.
Who said a criminal conviction is required? Not SCOTUS!
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
so how do you block someone from office for doing something its never been proved he did?......oh right......you just shop around for a judge who hates him.......
whatever helps you sleep at night
I think only retards hang their hats on civil trials when discussing if someone is a criminal
Your call, but legally its true. As a matter of law in any civil court in the Nation, he is a rapist. If it is relevant, the jury will be told that.
but not in a criminal court
because his rapist status is only that he he met the civil requirements - which is more likely true than not true
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Very kind of you, but most likely very ineffective as well. To repeat myself, you can lead a MAGATard to facts, but you can't make him think.
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Do you realize that you just mixed apples (civil law) with oranges (criminal law)?
People have always used civil courts for revenge and because of greed, as well as for justice. Why would today be any different than 50 years ago, or 200?
ThatOwlWoman
Not Nice
Civil. Same as medical malpractice/wrongful death. You'd think a "doctor" would know this.
I know, I prefer to teach to receptive and intelligent people.
I'm going to bump this - sick of you retards that say bullshit and run from your bullshit
millions of jury instructions across this land have used those exact words to explain what preponderance of the evidence means.
so you are a fucking idiot to argue with me on this
but we all know you are a fucking idiot. pretending to educate others. LMAO
cuckoo cuckoo
That is not the standard.
Indeed, he is a nutter who posted that Americans are paying the highest federal income tax in history.
that is exactly what preponderance means dipshit. it is how jurors are explained of it dipshit
so fuck off dipshit
"this is not the standard" derp derp derp
https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_judges/denlow/coffeyji.htm
consider yourself educated fuckwad
https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_documents/_forms/_judges/denlow/coffeyji.htm
consider yourself educated fuckwad
SmarterthanYou
rebel
the first big case of that system being abused, that I remember, was OJ Simpson.