Canceled.LTroll.4
Banned
Arts and crafts, gazpacho.
Arts and crafts, gazpacho.
lol....no comment as to why obama or holder haven't repudiated the statements
thanks for proving you're just a hack, and btw, this isn't the first time obama's dea have done this, it has happened a few times in cali and has been discussed on this board, so i am not calling him a liar for this once incident....it is well known obama hasn't kept his promise about this
"I want 3-4 links" - oh, the demands. Just read through the thread; if you really can't find it, I'll link it.
I see you ignored that fact that you painted yourself in the corner by finally (reluctantly) admitting that your initial response WAS about the CO incident, and how frenzied w/ Obama hate that makes you look.
Keep digging, Yurtsie (psycho)....
![]()
Did I really have to do this?
Stop with the demands. You're really psychotic....
i already refuted this in post 126 you stupid liar
where is the 3 or 4....lol
all you have is to repeat the same lies that i already debunked....lmao, you're really going for the gold on this onceler....
moron
A supposed lawyer debating that medical mj hasn't advanced more under Obama is beyond ...
He has not stopped the raids. Those involved in delivering marijuana are still uncertain of their legal status. His policy, if it ever takes effect, is gone with his administration. In what was has he advanced MM?
That's all you do when you're cornered by your own words. "I already refuted this."
What's to refute? You said it wasn't about the incident, then you said it was, then you said it wasn't, then you said....well, you get the picture.
Seriously - you're a bit psychotic, and it might actually be more than the ODS.
![]()
I gave you a couple of links, psycho. How can you keep denying that?
It's seriously weird. You really have no ability whatsoever to admit when you're wrong; it's a mental block for you.
But, not as serious as your clear ODS (and ODS denial).
you change your mind about 3-4 times on whether the "liar" comment was about the CO incident.
Wow - you really can't address that at all, can you?
That's amazing. Are you terrified of that aspect of things (which, really, is the crux of the discussion?)
You really stepped in it when you came around to admitting your first response was about the incident. I don't blame you for not being able to talk about the ramifications...
Quote:
you change your mind about 3-4 times on whether the "liar" comment was about the CO incident.