Canceled.LTroll.4
Banned
Arts and crafts, gazpacho.
so much for not raiding med marijuana places
- Thread starter SmarterthanYou
- Start date
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
are you threatening me? what do you mean by this? we know what maineman means, are you maineman?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
"I want 3-4 links" - oh, the demands. Just read through the thread; if you really can't find it, I'll link it.
I see you ignored that fact that you painted yourself in the corner by finally (reluctantly) admitting that your initial response WAS about the CO incident, and how frenzied w/ Obama hate that makes you look.
Keep digging, Yurtsie (psycho)....
i am not surprised you can't back up your false assertions.....because you're a liar
i never ever claimed i was not talking about the colorado incident, i have always maintained it was this incident and others....
next
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i already refuted this in post 126 you stupid liar
where is the 3 or 4....lol
all you have is to repeat the same lies that i already debunked....lmao, you're really going for the gold on this onceler....
moron
That's all you do when you're cornered by your own words. "I already refuted this."
What's to refute? You said it wasn't about the incident, then you said it was, then you said it wasn't, then you said....well, you get the picture.
Seriously - you're a bit psychotic, and it might actually be more than the ODS.
He has not stopped the raids. Those involved in delivering marijuana are still uncertain of their legal status. His policy, if it ever takes effect, is gone with his administration. In what way has he advanced MM?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
he wouldn't answer that for me....so good luck getting him to answer that for you
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
That's all you do when you're cornered by your own words. "I already refuted this."
What's to refute? You said it wasn't about the incident, then you said it was, then you said it wasn't, then you said....well, you get the picture.
Seriously - you're a bit psychotic, and it might actually be more than the ODS.
did you read post 126? the post you cited clearly showed i was talking about the incident, but you take a quickly worded sentence out of context and claim you're right. not true.
and where is the 3 or 4 onceler? don't tell me you lied about that as well.....
Honestly, it bores me to go through these threads when you demand more & more posts to show what has already been shown, in an irrefutable way: you said it wasn't about the CO incident, and you also said it was.
Frankly, I'm glad that you have finally 'fessed up that it WAS about the incident, and - since you admitted you didn't know all the facts, and didn't know if the agent was acting against policy - it's a clear incrimination of your Obama derangement.
It took a lot of posts, but you did come around in the end. I suppose there is some hope (slim, though - real slim).
Frankly, I'm glad that you have finally 'fessed up that it WAS about the incident, and - since you admitted you didn't know all the facts, and didn't know if the agent was acting against policy - it's a clear incrimination of your Obama derangement.
It took a lot of posts, but you did come around in the end. I suppose there is some hope (slim, though - real slim).
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
nice try onceler....there is no 3 or 4 posts, there is not even one
you got busted and called to the floor, and because you know you can't back it up, you cry that you're too tired to go back over the thread....yet you hound me for WEEKS about some cbo post
i'm glad you're finally stopping your lies and admitting you fucked up
you got busted and called to the floor, and because you know you can't back it up, you cry that you're too tired to go back over the thread....yet you hound me for WEEKS about some cbo post
i'm glad you're finally stopping your lies and admitting you fucked up
The energizer bunny of failure; you will out-last me, Yurtsie, because I'm headin' off to bed soon.
But it doesn't change the fact that you have said it was about the CO incident, and then wasn't, and then was again.
And again, if you're saying it was, and you called Obama a "liar" immediately, and said he says one thing and does another, based on the CO incident (again - this is what you are now claiming)....then it's pretty stupid, and shows a lot of hate on your part. According to the policy memo released in Oct., which I'm sure you still haven't read, the guy could be in violation of at least 2 of the guidelines (one if which you kept trying to ridicule & dismiss).
But you can't own up to that. You'll keep beating your psychotic chest, claiming victory, saying you refuted what is clearly in black & white, and so on. It's tiring, and kind of boring. I get no enjoyment whatsoever out of spending inordinate amounts of time going back & forth w/ a lunatic....
But it doesn't change the fact that you have said it was about the CO incident, and then wasn't, and then was again.
And again, if you're saying it was, and you called Obama a "liar" immediately, and said he says one thing and does another, based on the CO incident (again - this is what you are now claiming)....then it's pretty stupid, and shows a lot of hate on your part. According to the policy memo released in Oct., which I'm sure you still haven't read, the guy could be in violation of at least 2 of the guidelines (one if which you kept trying to ridicule & dismiss).
But you can't own up to that. You'll keep beating your psychotic chest, claiming victory, saying you refuted what is clearly in black & white, and so on. It's tiring, and kind of boring. I get no enjoyment whatsoever out of spending inordinate amounts of time going back & forth w/ a lunatic....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
wow. your desperation is truly saddening. i'm now psychotic because you can't back up your false claims about what i said. 3 or 4 times and you can't even give one link.
i honestly feel pity for you onceler. there is no need to get so worked up and angry because i asked you provide links to substantiate your claims.
this thread has been an unfortunate example of you entirely losing your cool and your irrational ability to admit you fucked up. don't get pissed off and call me psychotic just because you can't substantiate your claims, that just makes you look like an even bigger liar.
i honestly feel pity for you onceler. there is no need to get so worked up and angry because i asked you provide links to substantiate your claims.
this thread has been an unfortunate example of you entirely losing your cool and your irrational ability to admit you fucked up. don't get pissed off and call me psychotic just because you can't substantiate your claims, that just makes you look like an even bigger liar.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
lol....liar...you gave me the same link twice and that link actually has me talking about this incident, you just dishonestly took a quickly worded sentence out of context.....
lmao, your desperation is really showing now....come on, where is the 3 or 4 times onceler...are you going to show us the same link 3 times.........HAHAHA
I linked 2 posts. Does it matter? Yurt (psycho) - you totally contradict yourself in those posts.
Are you really denying that at one point in the thread, you realized how stupid it was to immediately call Obama a liar because of the CO incident (because, as you said, the facts are not in), so tried to claim that it was NOT about this incident?
This is tiresome - really. I don't even care; let's put that aside. NOW that you admit you called him a liar & said he was "doing" something that was different from what he "said" - based on the CO incident - are you then concluding that this agent was completely in the wrong, and that the guy he raided was in complete compliance w/ the new Obama policy?
You can't have it both ways, Yurtsie. You keep ignoring that, which really isn't surprising, because it's very incriminating. Why not address that?
Are you afraid?
Are you really denying that at one point in the thread, you realized how stupid it was to immediately call Obama a liar because of the CO incident (because, as you said, the facts are not in), so tried to claim that it was NOT about this incident?
This is tiresome - really. I don't even care; let's put that aside. NOW that you admit you called him a liar & said he was "doing" something that was different from what he "said" - based on the CO incident - are you then concluding that this agent was completely in the wrong, and that the guy he raided was in complete compliance w/ the new Obama policy?
You can't have it both ways, Yurtsie. You keep ignoring that, which really isn't surprising, because it's very incriminating. Why not address that?
Are you afraid?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
the links you posted in 143 and 125 are the same post. nice try, but once again i have to point out your lies. sorry to have to do that.
i showed you repeatedly how you took one quickly worded sentence out of context
now, either show the 3 or 4 where i contradict myself, or admit you lied.
real simple. no more games, show it or admit you lied.
i showed you repeatedly how you took one quickly worded sentence out of context
now, either show the 3 or 4 where i contradict myself, or admit you lied.
real simple. no more games, show it or admit you lied.
Last edited:
Wow - you really can't address that at all, can you?
That's amazing. Are you terrified of that aspect of things (which, really, is the crux of the discussion?)
You really stepped in it when you came around to admitting your first response was about the incident. I don't blame you for not being able to talk about the ramifications...
That's amazing. Are you terrified of that aspect of things (which, really, is the crux of the discussion?)
You really stepped in it when you came around to admitting your first response was about the incident. I don't blame you for not being able to talk about the ramifications...
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
the links you posted in 143 and 125 are the same post. nice try, but once again i have to point out your lies. sorry to have to do that.
i showed you repeatedly how you took one quickly worded sentence out of context
now, either show the 3 or 4 where i contradict myself, or admit you lied.
real simple. no more games, show it or admit you lied.
last chance, if you don't show the links, you will have admitted you lied
You always say stuff like that; I don't admit anything unless I actually admit it.
I have been asking you for many posts now, and you can't answer: if your initial response WAS about the CO incident, do you then believe that the agent was completely in the wrong, and that there was nothing about who he raided that violated Obama's policy?
If you can't answer that, you're admitting you have ODS, and that your initial response was pretty dumb....
I have been asking you for many posts now, and you can't answer: if your initial response WAS about the CO incident, do you then believe that the agent was completely in the wrong, and that there was nothing about who he raided that violated Obama's policy?
If you can't answer that, you're admitting you have ODS, and that your initial response was pretty dumb....