christiefan915
Catalyst
PiMP has his very own language.
He has the sort of snide, pretentious tone that abysmal had mastered.
PiMP has his very own language.
My numbers are from Iraqbodycount, so stop referencing a site you think is bullshit, and that blows your argument apart.
He has the sort of snide, pretentious tone that abysmal had mastered.
your numbers from iraqbodycount are total Iraqi casualties.....you pretend all Iraqi casualties are caused by Allied action.....in truth, the vast majority of Iraqi casualties are caused by the terrorists.....the statistics prove it, you are running away from looking at them.....your initial claim is bullshit and you don't dare address it.....
Policeman shot dead in al-Salam, Tal Afar
12-13 by suicide car bomb in Ramadi
Policeman by roadside bomb, Saba al-Bour, north Baghdad
Aide of election candidate shot dead in Maysan
Policeman shot dead in Tel al- Ruman, west Mosul
Policeman shot dead near home in al-Quds, east Mosul
Christian university student shot dead in al-Arabi, north Mosul
Two police by car bomb at crime lab, al-Nabi Younes, east Mosul
One by rocket at office of al-Ahrar party in Baghdad
not a single one killed by Allied forces in the page you linked....my bet is you can't come up with 5k let alone 100k....
I cannot avoid using a superior tone when speaking to you.....I am not an actor.....
I'm not running away from anything. My initial claim is that none of the casualties dating from the U.S. invasion of 2003 could have happened if there hadn't been an invasion to start with.
Directly and indirectly the casualties of the Iraq war were caused by U.S. action. No war launched by the U.S., no casualties caused by the U.S. How hard is that to understand?
You can argue all you want that terrorists caused the vast majority, etc. but it's QED that the U.S. initiated the situation leading to blood being spilled.
That blood is on the bush administration's hands, and may they burn in hell because of it.
I'm not running away from anything. My initial claim is that none of the casualties dating from the U.S. invasion of 2003 could have happened if there hadn't been an invasion to start with.
Directly and indirectly the casualties of the Iraq war were caused by U.S. action. No war launched by the U.S., no casualties caused by the U.S. How hard is that to understand?
You can argue all you want that terrorists caused the vast majority, etc. but it's QED that the U.S. initiated the situation leading to blood being spilled.
That blood is on the bush administration's hands, and may they burn in hell because of it.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Not quite.....you have to take into account deaths as a result of 12 years of "strategic bombing", then you have to take into account deaths by various spikes in cancers in areas heavy with DU dust. Then there are those nasty cluster bombs, people dying from lack of water, food, etc., after the local infrastructure was bombed out of existence. Even Iraqi body count concedes that there is a LOT of grey area regarding the results of the forementioned. And remember, we are talking cumulative here. So "vast majority" is somewhat of a distortion on your part. Check out the PDF on Iraq Body Count the dossier on civilian body count 2003-2005 thoroughly, and please just don't stop reading at the parts that you think bolster your claim.
What a misguided maroon he is. Just when you think you've heard it all....![]()
Post 157.
well shucks.....it's all the fault of some butterfly who flapped his wings in Brazil.....your just a typical brainless liberal who refuses to blame a guy with a stick of dynamite for killing school children....it's got to be Bush's fault instead.....get a fucking life.....I'm not running away from anything. My initial claim is that none of the casualties dating from the U.S. invasion of 2003 could have happened if there hadn't been an invasion to start with.
Directly and indirectly the casualties of the Iraq war were caused by U.S. action. No war launched by the U.S., no casualties caused by the U.S. How hard is that to understand?
You can argue all you want that terrorists caused the vast majority, etc. but it's QED that the U.S. initiated the situation leading to blood being spilled.
That blood is on the bush administration's hands, and may they burn in hell because of it.
She's right PiMP. There wouldn't have been a civil war in Iraq, except for the fact that you cheerled, and Bush launched an illegal, immoral, and unneccessary war.
Those hundreds of thousands of deaths are on your and Bush's hands.
fuckin' liberals.....if you hadn't been busy sucking Saddam's dick before the war, he might have been smart enough to cooperate with the UN.....you make me sick.....
only a fool would deny the FACT that the majority of deaths in Iraq were caused by Iraqi terrorists killing Iraqis.....you can provide all the partisan whitewash you want, but it doesn't change the fact that bombs set off in marketplaces were not placed there to kill Americans.....and only a fool would try and say that the majority of deaths in Iraq are due to domestic internal violence.
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
and only a fool would try and say that the majority of deaths in Iraq are due to domestic internal violence.
only a fool would deny the FACT that the majority of deaths in Iraq were caused by Iraqi terrorists killing Iraqis.....you can provide all the partisan whitewash you want, but it doesn't change the fact that bombs set off in marketplaces were not placed there to kill Americans.....
I noticed you totally avoided how I proved your ignorance regarding Hussein and Iraq....typical of your intellectual cowardice.
As the posts show, both Christie and I used the reference site YOU provided...the DIFFERENCE is that we read MORE than just one article and point from that site....and the conclusions were FAR different than what you are repeatedly squawking (as I referenced and what Christie provided in excerpt).
/shrugs....the facts prove I am right....something we all know you will never acknowledge.....Bottom line: you were proven wrong
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
I noticed you totally avoided how I proved your ignorance regarding Hussein and Iraq....typical of your intellectual cowardice.
????....like most things that never happened, it is easy to ignore.....
As the posts show, both Christie and I used the reference site YOU provided...the DIFFERENCE is that we read MORE than just one article and point from that site....and the conclusions were FAR different than what you are repeatedly squawking (as I referenced and what Christie provided in excerpt).
no, the difference is, I used the facts the website provided and you used the opinion the website provided.....
Bottom line: you were proven wrong
/shrugs....the facts prove I am right....something we all know you will never acknowledge.....
well shucks.....it's all the fault of some butterfly who flapped his wings in Brazil.....your just a typical brainless liberal who refuses to blame a guy with a stick of dynamite for killing school children....it's got to be Bush's fault instead.....get a fucking life.....
????....like most things that never happened, it is easy to ignore.....
no, the difference is, I used the facts the website provided and you used the opinion the website provided.....
/shrugs....the facts prove I am right....something we all know you will never acknowledge.....