Segregation now, segregation forever!

[Jarod]

Your lies and ignorace of American and Southern history are pittafull.

Your ignorance of the Civil Rights Movement is pittafull.

 

[zappasguitar]

I never said America was in favor of desegregating Society!

I merely pointed out that some of our leaders were!

THERE WAS NO SUCH ACT! YOU ARE A LIAR! YOU ARE A RACIST!

Good Heavens Jarod...you made Dixie MAD!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Dixie said...

We had NO Congressmen who were the least bit concerned with giving black people a completely desegregated society! NONE! If you can cite any example prior to WWII, I would love to see it! Truth is, it doesn't exist!

What about Congressman Joseph Rainey ?

LMFAO! You mean the forward-thinking liberal pro-desegregationist citizens of South FRICKIN Carolina elected him to represent them in Congress???? How about spinning us another REVISIONIST yarn!

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Jarod
Dixie said...

The truth, as ugly as it may be, is that every politician prior to 1965, is responsible for supporting segregationist policy, because they DID! Repeatedly! For a century, every president, every Congress, and every Judge they appointed, upheld and maintained a system of complete and total segregation in America!


No one in their right political mind, in 1948, would have been opposed to segregation!

Throughout history, there have not been people in political power, advocating change in our segregationist policy, prior to 1963! It doesn't exist, because black people were shut out of the political process, and it was not an issue, it was presumed and assumed you supported and condoned segregationist policy, because that was how things were in America. No one stood up and said it was bad! Everyone accepted it, and continued to condone it!


there were people in 1864 who thought slaves were equal to whites! Unfortunately, NONE of them were political figures, or able to be political figures, because the overwhelming majority of an ALL WHITE electorate, fundamentally disagreed with them!

They didn't engage in political debate on the issue! They didn't campaign or advocate for the issue! They didn't put the issue in their national platforms! It may not signify support for segregationist policies, but it sure doesn't imply there was a fight against them. You can say that "plenty opposed" the status quot when it came to segregation, but it wasn't "plenty" or the law would have changed, politicians would have campaigned on the issue, people would have initiated change, had that been the case. Let's tell the truth, shall we? Aside from a few black activists and a few pinhead liberal elites, no one in America was advocating against segregation until the early 60s.

I have not denied there were activists speaking out against segregation, I made that abundantly clear 50 posts back, it's not what I have said. Our society as a whole, including ALL the political representatives we elected to office, held a view condoning segregation, or tacitly refused to take a firm stand on the issue. That is the truth, that is how things were in America. You can deny that, and claim it wasn't the case, but it most certainly was.


The history of the struggle is, for nearly 100 years, there was no struggle, segregation was accepted and condoned, and affixed in our society by the politicians, congress, judges, and any other positions of authority, which were all controlled by white people!


With regard to political leaders, congressmen who could effectively change laws, presidents, judges, etc.... there were essentially NONE! From 1864 to 1964, the number of such leaders can be counted on less than one hand! For you to keep insisting this was not the case, is laughable and foolish.


No politician was out there "pushing for" desegregation and racial equality! It just wasn't happening in the real world! To a fault, every damn one of them were either promoting segregation, or tacitly accepting of it...a 'necessary evil', or whatever. None of them stood up to challenge it or speak against it... for 100 years! Well, almost 100, anyway....

We had NO Congressmen who were the least bit concerned with giving black people a completely desegregated society! NONE! If you can cite any example prior to WWII, I would love to see it! Truth is, it doesn't exist!


Our society as a whole, including ALL the political representatives we elected to office, held a view condoning segregation, or tacitly refused to take a firm stand on the issue.

From the time of the Civil War until after WWII, the overwhelming majority of people in America, were supportive of the segregation policies. No one in political power, or seeking political power, was advocating desegregation. This went on for decades, Congress after Congress, Supreme Court after Supreme Court, President after President!

No one in political power or running for any high-level political office, supported, condoned, or advocated desegregation, prior to WWII. If you have ANY example, please post it!

The challenge still stands... Show me any political leader who was openly advocating public desegregation prior to 1964! Just one example?

You can read what you want to into my comments, you haven't given us any examples of public legislation to desegregate anything yet. No presidents or Congressional leaders advocating it, nothing... save for an instance of Truman desegregating the military in 1948, you have nothing. There is no verbal snafu, just as there is no record of Congress supporting desegregation for nearly a century. You can try to hide from that or live in denial of it if you like, I can't change the mind of a bigot, and I won't try.


I've already told you, I am never wrong!

----------------------------------

To which I say, CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1875!

To all of the ABOVE I point out the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1875! A bill passed by CONGRESS that made segregation illegal and instituted a fine for segregating, in fact it went further than the CIVIL RIGHTS ACT of 1964 because it prevented even private orginizations from segregating.

This act was written by ELECTED CONGRESSMEN, am MAJORITY PASSED THE BILL after it was supported and campaigned on!

Dont they teach this stuff in Alabama?

Dixie, to prevent further embarrasment of yourself enroll in an American History Class before you speak up again!

Well

Beautiful....hang him with a rope of his own words. He'll either avoid this, deny it, BS about it, etc., and just keep regurgitating his revisionist dreck Just like he did with this:

[ame="http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=610980&postcount=431"]Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Segregation now, segregation forever![/ame]

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Beautiful....hang him with a rope of his own words. He'll either avoid this, deny it, BS about it, etc., and just keep regurgitating his revisionist dreck Just like he did with this:

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Segregation now, segregation forever!

LOL... Jarhead would hang HIMSELF if you let him near a rope! Don't do it Jarhead... stay away from the rope and sharp objects!

I've not "regurgitated" anything Chicklet, that is what YOU keep doing. Please show us something to REFUTE what I have said! Stop hurling meaningless insults at me, and present something to back your argument, or the argument of the other nitwits! Stop trying to impress "the folks" with your fancy use of words like "chronology" and "insipid" and present some kind of a fact or evidence to support your ignorance! We are getting nowhere with page after page of the same stupid shit. Do you really believe that works for ya? I mean, you really think people are taking what you have to offer to heart here? So far, all you've posted is one scurrilous insult after another, and that's about all. That just doesn't get it in the arena of debate, sorry Chicky-dee!

 

[Minister of Truth]

Not elected by the people, as I correctly said.

Don't knock the pre-1913 Senate. The 17th Amendment is an abomination to the US Congress.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Don't knock the pre-1913 Senate. The 17th Amendment is an abomination to the US Congress.

Uhm, it was ratified by 3/4 of the states. Why do you hate our freedoms???

For the record...

Nine bribery cases were brought before the Senate between 1866 and 1906, and 45 deadlocks occurred in 20 states between 1891 and 1905, resulting in numerous delays in seating Senators. Beginning in 1899, Delaware did not send a senator to Washington for four years.

Yah... that was working out really well, wasn't it?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Beautiful....hang him with a rope of his own words. He'll either avoid this, deny it, BS about it, etc., and just keep regurgitating his revisionist dreck Just like he did with this:

Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Segregation now, segregation forever!

LOL... Jarhead would hang HIMSELF if you let him near a rope! Don't do it Jarhead... stay away from the rope and sharp objects!

I've not "regurgitated" anything Chicklet, that is what YOU keep doing. Please show us something to REFUTE what I have said! Stop hurling meaningless insults at me, and present something to back your argument, or the argument of the other nitwits! Stop trying to impress "the folks" with your fancy use of words like "chronology" and "insipid" and present some kind of a fact or evidence to support your ignorance! We are getting nowhere with page after page of the same stupid shit. Do you really believe that works for ya? I mean, you really think people are taking what you have to offer to heart here? So far, all you've posted is one scurrilous insult after another, and that's about all. That just doesn't get it in the arena of debate, sorry Chicky-dee!

Notice folks, how this bigoted buffoon avoids acknowledging how Jarod proved him wrong on one point by just using his own words against him. He also avoids how I presented evidence that disproved yet another one of his oft repeated assertions and he just hoped no one would notice his inability to fault the logic. Instead, he does what every defeated racist revisionist does when hopelessly trapped by facts and logic....he goes on a personal tirade of faux hysterics, childish insults peppered with his distorted and dishonest review of the exchanges. Poor Dixie....too deluded to realize how foolish his posts are, and how revealing they are of his subconscious, too stubborn and proud of his ignorance to learn better.

 

[Minister of Truth]

Uhm, it was ratified by 3/4 of the states. Why do you hate our freedoms???

For the record...

Nine bribery cases were brought before the Senate between 1866 and 1906, and 45 deadlocks occurred in 20 states between 1891 and 1905, resulting in numerous delays in seating Senators. Beginning in 1899, Delaware did not send a senator to Washington for four years.

Yah... that was working out really well, wasn't it?

So was the 18th Amendment. Both are an abomination. The 17th Amendment has nothing to do with "freedom," because the Senate is supposed to represent the states. Its the House that represents the people, and attempting to make the Senate a clone of the House was just idiotic. That is why the Senate deals with things that are of a bigger picture, while the House deals with things that are closer to home.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Keep running your mouth to your imaginary audience you fraud, nothing you've said has contradicted a damn thing, and Jarhead certainly hasn't proved anything wrong. I don't think Jarhead has ever proved anything wrong in his whole pathetic life. You want to keep trying to interject your stupidity to make it appear that I have said something "racist" or insulting to blacks, and it is YOU and your nitwit buddies who keep denying the history of discrimination in America. Oh, you will gladly lay the blame for it all on the South and racist Republicans, even though it was Republicans who ended slavery and supported Civil Rights. That's what kind of a lying piece of dog shit you are, and everyone with half a brain can see it in this thread. I am satisfied with that, my work is done here, I've exposed you for the worthless garbage you are, and it tickles me to death! You want to rant for another page about me, making one personal attack after another? You go right ahead! I can handle it! You've not presented ANYTHING of substance here, and the... uh... chronology of the posts... shows it!

JERK!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

So was the 18th Amendment. Both are an abomination. The 17th Amendment has nothing to do with "freedom," because the Senate is supposed to represent the states. Its the House that represents the people, and attempting to make the Senate a clone of the House was just idiotic. That is why the Senate deals with things that are of a bigger picture, while the House deals with things that are closer to home.

Take it up with the States who ratified the Amendment.

Or better yet... FUCKING LEAVE!

 

[Taichiliberal]

Keep running your mouth to your imaginary audience you fraud, nothing you've said has contradicted a damn thing, and Jarhead certainly hasn't proved anything wrong. I don't think Jarhead has ever proved anything wrong in his whole pathetic life. You want to keep trying to interject your stupidity to make it appear that I have said something "racist" or insulting to blacks, and it is YOU and your nitwit buddies who keep denying the history of discrimination in America. Oh, you will gladly lay the blame for it all on the South and racist Republicans, even though it was Republicans who ended slavery and supported Civil Rights. That's what kind of a lying piece of dog shit you are, and everyone with half a brain can see it in this thread. I am satisfied with that, my work is done here, I've exposed you for the worthless garbage you are, and it tickles me to death! You want to rant for another page about me, making one personal attack after another? You go right ahead! I can handle it! You've not presented ANYTHING of substance here, and the... uh... chronology of the posts... shows it!

JERK!

Typical of the racist, folks.....he justifies all his bigotry and revisionist claptrap because in his delusional mind, the world is EXACTLY as he says. Of course, as the chronology of the thread shows, once his assertions and contentions are contradicted by a thorough analysis of history, he becomes undone, as his spittle laden rant here shows. Unlike David Duke, no one is paying Dixie for his foolishness. So he'll spew the last word chock full of the same nonsense he's been spewing over and over on this thread, ignoring facts, distorting reality, lying, etc. I'd pity him, but then again he does it to himself

 

[Minister of Truth]

Take it up with the States who ratified the Amendment.

Or better yet... FUCKING LEAVE!

No, that's what Southerners do. I live with it, in the hope that one day it will be repealed, the way the 18th Amendment was repealed.

BTW, I'm not a jerk, I'm a douchebag.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Notice folks, how this bigoted buffoon avoids acknowledging how Jarod proved him wrong on one point by just using his own words against him. He also avoids how I presented evidence that disproved yet another one of his oft repeated assertions and he just hoped no one would notice his inability to fault the logic. Instead, he does what every defeated racist revisionist does when hopelessly trapped by facts and logic....he goes on a personal tirade of faux hysterics, childish insults peppered with his distorted and dishonest review of the exchanges. Poor Dixie....too deluded to realize how foolish his posts are, and how revealing they are of his subconscious, too stubborn and proud of his ignorance to learn better.

"Notice folks....."

You are truly delusional, if you actually think anyone cares what you post.
Grow the fuck up, JEEZE.

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Typical of the racist, folks.....he justifies all his bigotry and revisionist claptrap because in his delusional mind, the world is EXACTLY as he says. Of course, as the chronology of the thread shows, once his assertions and contentions are contradicted by a thorough analysis of history, he becomes undone, as his spittle laden rant here shows. Unlike David Duke, no one is paying Dixie for his foolishness. So he'll spew the last word chock full of the same nonsense he's been spewing over and over on this thread, ignoring facts, distorting reality, lying, etc. I'd pity him, but then again he does it to himself

My chronology, assertion, contention, analysis, and spittle are spot on, and I proved my point with actual historic accounts from 1875 through 1920, of beatings, lynchings, and mobs of angry white folks slaughtering black folks in places all over America, not just the South. I destroyed Jarheads idiotic assertions, contentions, analysis, and spittle, that we "outlawed segregation" in 1875, as he claimed, and completely PWNED that ass. Nothing I have said was "David Duke-like" or even remotely close, but the continued DENIAL of history on YOUR part, is indeed like the sheet-wearing racists who maintained discriminatory policies for nearly 100 years after the Civil War. YOUR denial of the history and defense of stupidity is indeed insulting to the Civil Rights struggle of black Americans, and you should hang your pathetic empty head in shame, but you won't, because you are too ignorant to know what a bigoted fool you are. All you've done in this thread is post one insulting rant after another, directed at me personally, without any regard for the context of what I posted, and this is what you constantly do on this forum, as most everyone can attest. I've got nothing to apologize for, I've stated my case clearly and concisely, and it hasn't been refuted by you or anyone else. The Truth can't be refuted, it's there for anyone curious enough to read it, but you are an incurious dullard who doesn't care about the conversation, you just like to show your ass and make a fool of yourself. Best thing I can do, is get out of your way!

 

[Jarod]

LMFAO! You mean the forward-thinking liberal pro-desegregationist citizens of South FRICKIN Carolina elected him to represent them in Congress???? How about spinning us another REVISIONIST yarn!

Yes, his district was a majority black.

Remember these congressional elections are not state wide.

He was a distinguished member of the house who fought with his radical Republican colligues to desegregate the schools in 1875!

Your assumption that blacks could not do such a thing is borderline racist, and if you review my history I do not use that term lightly!

 

[Jarod]

Notice folks, how this bigoted buffoon avoids acknowledging how Jarod proved him wrong on one point by just using his own words against him. He also avoids how I presented evidence that disproved yet another one of his oft repeated assertions and he just hoped no one would notice his inability to fault the logic. Instead, he does what every defeated racist revisionist does when hopelessly trapped by facts and logic....he goes on a personal tirade of faux hysterics, childish insults peppered with his distorted and dishonest review of the exchanges. Poor Dixie....too deluded to realize how foolish his posts are, and how revealing they are of his subconscious, too stubborn and proud of his ignorance to learn better.

I noticed!

 

[Jarod]

Now Dixie, lets go back to your posts about how NOT A SINGLE REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS thought blacks were equal to whites prior to 1964...

What about my most recient example of Congressman Joseph Rainey?

A man who fought for desegregation in the public schools in 1875!

 

[Jarod]

Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870
Congressman Joseph Rainey, elected to Congress, 1870

Elected by the non-racist forward-thinking Southern state of South Carolina!
LMAO... From the Great Desegregationist State of South Carolina!
LMAO... From the Great Desegregationist State of South Carolina!
LMAO... From the Great Desegregationist State of South Carolina!
LMAO... From the Great Desegregationist State of South Carolina!
LMAO... From the Great Desegregationist State of South Carolina!

IDIOT!