Democrat Toe Tapper

From previous link:

Willey told her that Clinton's sexual approach "came out of nowhere and was forceful, almost to the point of an attack. ... The president had his hands on her breasts and all over her body. The president put Willey's hand on his penis. ...

"Willey said that the president was so out of control that his face was purple, and the veins were showing on his neck and forehead. The meeting ended when someone entered the adjacent office." (FBI Statement of Linda Tripp; House Document 105-316; Part 3; Page 3998.)
Reporters have focused on her claim that Clinton exposed himself to her and merely asked for oral sex. But most Americans don't realize that Jones alleges she was subject to unwanted groping and momentary imprisonment as part of her ordeal.

In her amended complaint, Jones says that before Clinton coaxed her to "kiss it," he stroked her hair and complimented her on her "curves." She retreated to the couch, whereupon Clinton followed, says Jones, placed his hand on her thigh, and began sliding it toward her "pubic area."

After Clinton exposed himself, she made a break for the door. Clinton interrupted her escape and held the door briefly while he warned, "You're smart. Dave Harrington [Jones' boss] is a friend of mine. Let's keep this between ourselves."
 
Thats not sexual harrassment, its an unwanted sexual advance. But why do you choose to belive linda tripp's accounts of these women?
Which is actually worse than simple harassment. Tripps accounts were collaborated and reasonable with respect to all available evidence. Even Clinton never denied then under oath, except when he did then was later proved to be lying.
 
Which is actually worse than simple harassment. Tripps accounts were collaborated and reasonable with respect to all available evidence. Even Clinton never denied then under oath, except when he did then was later proved to be lying.

How does anyone have sex unless they risk an unwanted sexual approach?
 
How does anyone have sex unless they risk an unwanted sexual approach?
For me, I've found a stimulating conversation, some red wine followed by a wink works better than "forceful, almost to the point of an attack. ... The president had his hands on her breasts and all over her body. The president put Willey's hand on his penis."
:palm:
 
For me, I've found a stimulating conversation, some red wine followed by a wink works better than "forceful, almost to the point of an attack. ... The president had his hands on her breasts and all over her body. The president put Willey's hand on his penis."
:palm:

Thats just a difference in approach, if the hearsay you choose to belive were true.

If these women said no and he persisted, then I agree it would be a problem.
 
Thats just a difference in approach, if the hearsay you choose to belive were true.

If these women said no and he persisted, then I agree it would be a problem.
That's exactly what the women said.

By the way, thanks for proving my earlier assertion, that liberals will go to great lengths to defend their heroes, ignoring their attacks on the very people they claim to champion and going to great lengths to ignore them until undeniable evidence, such as DNA from a stained dress, are presented.
 
That's exactly what the women said.

By the way, thanks for proving my earlier assertion, that liberals will go to great lengths to defend their heroes, ignoring their attacks on the very people they claim to champion and going to great lengths to ignore them until undeniable evidence, such as DNA from a stained dress, are presented.

I just dont trust hearsay...But I never heard these woman say they said no yet he persisted!
 
Again, his party threw him under the bus. No one supported him.


Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight...they supported him enough so that he didn't give up his Senate seat...he's still a sitting SENATOR.

Because he got "thrown under the bus".

Behold...SM's got a new definition for "thrown under the bus."
 
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight...they supported him enough so that he didn't give up his Senate seat...he's still a sitting SENATOR.

Because he got "thrown under the bus".

Behold...SM's got a new definition for "thrown under the bus."
LOL. Just amusing.

He lost all support of the party, he didn't run in 2008 because the Lt. Gov was going to run against him in a Primary with the support of the party. His seat is currently filled by that same Lt. Gov, now Senator from Idaho, Jim Risch (R).

While I wish the Rs would quit zeroing in on silliness like homosexuality, the fact that this man refused to resign when asked doesn't mean he had any support from the party.
 
Back
Top