DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
From previous link:
Democrat Toe Tapper
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.2
- Start date
its a double standard because pubs act all moral. Tiger woods syndrome.
We can rail more on the dems for fiscal reasons.. for example raising our taxes saying right thing to do then getting caught in New Hampshire over the boarder buying tax free booze by the cases.
http://americaswatchtower.com/2009/...ught-in-new-hampshire-avoiding-the-sales-tax/
We can rail more on the dems for fiscal reasons.. for example raising our taxes saying right thing to do then getting caught in New Hampshire over the boarder buying tax free booze by the cases.
http://americaswatchtower.com/2009/...ught-in-new-hampshire-avoiding-the-sales-tax/
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Again, when a Republican does it, he is quickly tossed under the bus.
Thats not sexual harrassment, its an unwanted sexual advance. But why do you choose to belive linda tripp's accounts of these women?
I belive toe tapper is still in the Sennate.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
He was never supported by the leadership or the Party or the vast majority of conservative Republicans.
They could have pushed him out...
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Which is actually worse than simple harassment. Tripps accounts were collaborated and reasonable with respect to all available evidence. Even Clinton never denied then under oath, except when he did then was later proved to be lying.
How does anyone have sex unless they risk an unwanted sexual approach?
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
For me, I've found a stimulating conversation, some red wine followed by a wink works better than "forceful, almost to the point of an attack. ... The president had his hands on her breasts and all over her body. The president put Willey's hand on his penis."
For me, I've found a stimulating conversation, some red wine followed by a wink works better than "forceful, almost to the point of an attack. ... The president had his hands on her breasts and all over her body. The president put Willey's hand on his penis."
Thats just a difference in approach, if the hearsay you choose to belive were true.
If these women said no and he persisted, then I agree it would be a problem.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
That's exactly what the women said.
By the way, thanks for proving my earlier assertion, that liberals will go to great lengths to defend their heroes, ignoring their attacks on the very people they claim to champion and going to great lengths to ignore them until undeniable evidence, such as DNA from a stained dress, are presented.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
zappasguitar
Well-known member
So he was NOT thrown under the bus...if fact...HE'S STILL A SENATOR!
Hey, what's one more SM lie...
I just dont trust hearsay...But I never heard these woman say they said no yet he persisted!
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Again, his party threw him under the bus. No one supported him.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiight...they supported him enough so that he didn't give up his Senate seat...he's still a sitting SENATOR.
Because he got "thrown under the bus".
Behold...SM's got a new definition for "thrown under the bus."
He lost reelection, so I was wrong he is no longer a senator.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Apparently hearsay is good enough for some...if said hearsay is being used to excoriate some Liberal.
LOL. Just amusing.
He lost all support of the party, he didn't run in 2008 because the Lt. Gov was going to run against him in a Primary with the support of the party. His seat is currently filled by that same Lt. Gov, now Senator from Idaho, Jim Risch (R).
While I wish the Rs would quit zeroing in on silliness like homosexuality, the fact that this man refused to resign when asked doesn't mean he had any support from the party.