Jack Smith files to drop Jan. 6 charges against Donald Trump

ADreamOfLiberty said:
Which is why he needs to this time.

You can let something slide the first time if you think admonition is enough, but if you turn your back and the stab you, then anything but counter-attack is tantamount to surrender.
Click to expand...
Couldn't agree more, and isn't it quite ironic that libs had no problem with all the hate and warfare/lawfare they leveled against Trump and we Republicans, that they now are squealing like pork filled pigs that Trump is going after them come J-20th, and that he'll even jail them.
 
Libhater said:
Couldn't agree more, and isn't it quite ironic that libs had no problem with all the hate and warfare/lawfare they leveled against Trump and we Republicans, that they now are squealing like pork filled pigs that Trump is going after them come J-20th, and that he'll even jail them.
Click to expand...
Trump is better than Jesus.
 
Oh happy days are here again....the skies above are clear again....Donald Trump is our president again.....happy days are here AGAIN! EVERYBODY NOW! Oh Happy days are here again.....we kicked the commies out of office again....Let us raise our voice and cheer again....Happy days are here aaaaaaagain!
 
Rightys are so happy that Trumos is getting away with his 4 years crime wave. It shows that justice is not real to them. You use it as you wish.
 
archives said:
Hardly, not at all what I am saying, rather that Barr, assisted by Trump’s Court, made it next to impossible to ever take a sitting President to Court. Smith is just recognizing this reality, however Smith’s appeal to the Court states clearly that he doesn’t not admonish the charges and that he purposely filed the appeal “without prejudice,” meaning it could be reopened in the future
Click to expand...
Leftist drivel. For all your whining about the threat trump poses to America you people give up pretty easily. You people just can't be honest can you?
 
Joe said:
Too bad DOJ policy doesn't preclude indicting other criminals who thought they were untouchable.

They honestly believed Harris would win and they would never be held accountable. No wonder they're so upset.
Click to expand...
DOJ policy is to not indict unless there is enough evidence that a conviction is possible. That policy won't change and judges don't take kindly to prosecutors that violate that policy or the Constitution.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
DOJ policy is to not indict unless there is enough evidence that a conviction is possible. That policy won't change and judges don't take kindly to prosecutors that violate that policy or the Constitution.
Click to expand...
How is that relevant? I didn't say go arresting people willy nilly but don't worry it won't take long to have enough evidence once the people hiding it and covering for the criminals are gone.
 
archives said:
Sure he did, he is dropping the charges but leaving it open to be resurrected in the future, called dismissal “without prejudice,” which I would explain to you but your not interested in facts
Click to expand...
He better go somewhere there's no extradition. He's got some 'splainin' to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top