Term limits!

Would you support the same term limits for Congress that the 22 Amendment imposes upon the POTUS?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 60.0%
  • No

    Votes: 2 40.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • Poll closed .
Remember Obamacare? To pass it they wheeled Robert Byrd into the Senate chamber directly from his hospital bed where he lay nearly dead to cast the deciding vote...

Sen-Robert-Byrd-Health-Care.jpg




In the true fashion of Communist politburo members, this sort doesn't give up their grasp on power until it is taken from their cold dead hands by force.
 
Remember Obamacare? To pass it they wheeled Robert Byrd into the Senate chamber directly from his hospital bed where he lay nearly dead to cast the deciding vote...

Sen-Robert-Byrd-Health-Care.jpg




In the true fashion of Communist politburo members, this sort doesn't give up their grasp on power until it is taken from their cold dead hands by force.


Old age and infirmity are one thing; terms in office are another.

Thanks for your vote. :thup:
 
The Senate is 6 year terms , 2 terms is enough for them the House is 2 year terms so let them have 6 terms . 12 years in Congress is enough.

So you agree that two terms is enough in the Senate. :thup:

Why aren't two terms in the House enough?

Should the terms be the same for both legislative offices?
 
OR make Congress and the Presidency the same 2 4 year terms .

I'd agree with that.

make it so they are all staggered, President one year , Senate the next and the House the next and a year off.

That's more complicated. I'm not sure it's feasible.

And the SCOTUS should also have term limits , No more then 8 years like all the other offices of the Federal gov. we elect.

That would be unconstitutional.

Article III, Section 1 of the United States Constitution states that federal judges, including Supreme Court Justices, "shall hold their Offices during good Behavior," which has been interpreted to mean lifetime tenure unless they resign, retire, die, or are impeached and removed from office.

@Grok
 
Those should be, just as they are in many other sectors of the economy and life. We just saw that Biden was unfit to hold office due entirely to age for example.


I disagree. Too many constitutional hurdles to overcome.

A set term limit based on terms in office is cut and dried.
 
So you agree that two terms is enough in the Senate. :thup:

Why aren't two terms in the House enough?

Should the terms be the same for both legislative offices?
I'd say 3 terms in the Senate or House not serving more than 12 years maximum with no crossover. That is a cumulative total of 3 terms in one or both max. I'd also eliminate all retirement and other post service benefits.
 
I'd say 3 terms in the Senate or House not serving more than 12 years maximum with no crossover. That is a cumulative total of 3 terms in one or both max. I'd also eliminate all retirement and other post service benefits.

Over complicated, IMO.
 
So you agree that two terms is enough in the Senate. :thup:

Why aren't two terms in the House enough?

Should the terms be the same for both legislative offices?
Well the House terms are only 2 year terms , would you want them changed to 4 year terms?
 
I'd agree with that.



That's more complicated. I'm not sure it's feasible.



That would be unconstitutional.

Article III, Section 1 of the United States Constitution states that federal judges, including Supreme Court Justices, "shall hold their Offices during good Behavior," which has been interpreted to mean lifetime tenure unless they resign, retire, die, or are impeached and removed from office.

@Grok
Change the CONSTITUTION to make it 2 four year terms for judges of the SC.
 
Back
Top