Should pulchritudinous Pam Bondi resign for the Epstein Files farce?
- Thread starter Diogenes
- Start date
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
There's no reason whatsoever for her to quit. She got the files and released them. Just because they don't contain the sort of salacious stuff you wanted to find in them doesn't mean squat.
Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
She expressed anger over the nature and paucity of the files after she'd had them in her possession and announced their imminent release.
Incompetence.
Even Diogenes admits I was right, and the whole trump releasing some sort of secret Epstein list was a farce. It is nice to know we all admit I was right now.
trump could easily just release his records on Giuffre, but has not. Instead, he has done his best to destroy them.
It is incompetence, but it also the trump method. he has spent 15 years promising to release the secrets about Obama, with nothing. Now he is promising to release secrets about JFK, and nothing.
trump could easily just release his records on Giuffre, but has not. Instead, he has done his best to destroy them.
Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
No ones cares what you have to say.
Other than the part where you admit I was right and trump's claims were all a farce.
The rest of the story of what happened between you and your father is best left unsaid.
She released what she had and demanded the FBI release anymore that they tried to hide from her.
Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
She was either played, or she played the public.
Neither is acceptable.
That entire episode was excruciatingly amateurish.
I knew in seconds that those 200 pages had nothing in them that wasn't already in the public domain.
If she didn't know that too, she should have.
If she did know. and trumpeted old news as some kind of "bombshell", she set a very bad precedent.
She should resign, or be fired and replaced.
She has brought ridicule and disappointing disrepute upon the office of Attorney General.
The only question is; who should replace her?
Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
Pam Bondi’s Jeffrey Epstein stunt reveals populism’s limits
The attorney general’s promised revelations about Jeffrey Epstein’s associations were a dud.
Donald Trump is president for a second time because Americans have lost trust in institutions, and he has stacked his administration with populist bomb-throwers.
Now they’re in a position to actually prove the claims of elite perfidy they have indulged and encouraged.
But what if they can’t?
Witness the embarrassing spectacle of the Trump Justice Department’s choreographed release of “The Epstein Files.”
Bondi asked darkly in November “why AG Garland and the Justice Department are so quiet” about Epstein.
She has teased the release of information on the case, and on Thursday the administration invited right-wing social media personalities to receive “The Epstein Files: Part 1.”
They marched out of the White House brandishing folders with that title. Finally, the truth was poised to come out!
But soon there was trouble. Despite the pageantry, it turned out the Justice Department gave the influencers largely stale information.
The populist base that was supposed to be vindicated by the release of Epstein files began to complain.
“What we were looking for was hidden from us,” said one of the influencers. “Who is subverting POTUS?” posted conservative media personality Glenn Beck. He claimed that the White House believed law enforcement had the list but was “refusing to turn it over.”
The response to the Justice Department’s theatrics apparently short of what she hoped for, Bondi released a defensive letter she sent to FBI Director Kash Patel.
In the Thursday letter, Bondi said she “was repeatedly assured by the FBI that we had received the full set of documents.”
But yesterday, she said, “I learned from a source that the FBI Field Office in New York was in possession” of thousands more pages.
She demanded that they be turned over to her by Friday morning. They weren't.
Patel had claimed a few months ago that the government was suppressing the Epstein files “because of who’s on that list.” Perhaps the FBI director can now force the deep state to cough up.
But as lawyer Ted Frank noted, a top law firm seeking compensation for Epstein’s victims for years “left no stone unturned” and had every incentive to find co-conspirators.
There are certainly many unanswered questions about Epstein’s strange career and associations.
But what is most likely happening here is that the populist media universe led on its followers with an exaggerated political tale, and the Bondi Justice Department is flailing as it tries to play along.
Last edited:
They either withheld information or they didn’t.
We shall see.
BBC
https://www.bbc.com › news › articles
2 days ago — The attorney general is accusing federal agents in New York of withholding documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
We shall see.
Attorney General Pam Bondi alleges FBI agents withheld ...
BBC
https://www.bbc.com › news › articles
2 days ago — The attorney general is accusing federal agents in New York of withholding documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
No one cares about the Tate bros, Anchovies.
Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
As of my last update, there is no clear, definitive evidence confirming whether the FBI has fully complied with Attorney General Pam Bondi’s latest request for the complete Jeffrey Epstein case files, due by 8:00 a.m. on February 28, 2025.
Bondi’s request, outlined in a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel, demanded the delivery of all records, documents, audio, video recordings, and materials related to Epstein and his clients, following her discovery that the FBI’s New York field office allegedly withheld thousands of pages of documents.
She had initially received only about 200 pages, despite assurances that this was the full set.
Since today is March 1, 2025, and the deadline was yesterday morning, the situation should have progressed.
However, without real-time updates beyond my knowledge base, I cannot confirm compliance.
Reports prior to the deadline, such as Bondi’s accusations and Patel’s public statement on X about ensuring transparency with “no cover-ups, no missing documents,” suggest intent to address the issue, but no official confirmation of delivery has been widely documented in available sources as of the cutoff.
The first phase of files released on February 27, 2025, was criticized for lacking new revelations, indicating possible ongoing delays or resistance within the FBI.
@Grok
Bondi’s request, outlined in a letter to FBI Director Kash Patel, demanded the delivery of all records, documents, audio, video recordings, and materials related to Epstein and his clients, following her discovery that the FBI’s New York field office allegedly withheld thousands of pages of documents.
She had initially received only about 200 pages, despite assurances that this was the full set.
Since today is March 1, 2025, and the deadline was yesterday morning, the situation should have progressed.
However, without real-time updates beyond my knowledge base, I cannot confirm compliance.
Reports prior to the deadline, such as Bondi’s accusations and Patel’s public statement on X about ensuring transparency with “no cover-ups, no missing documents,” suggest intent to address the issue, but no official confirmation of delivery has been widely documented in available sources as of the cutoff.
The first phase of files released on February 27, 2025, was criticized for lacking new revelations, indicating possible ongoing delays or resistance within the FBI.
@Grok
Ah the UK and other nations do, their wanted for human trafficking and child trafficking, offenses just as sickening as Epsteins
The UK and other nations don’t matter.
There is a reason they were allowed to come to America.
We shall see.
Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
christiefan915
Catalyst
I don't know. There's humor in rickrolling.
Diogenes
Nemo me impune lacessit
That was the equally ill-advised intern who runs the Judicial Committee's account on 𝕏, silly woman.
It's been dealt with.