IBDaMann
Well-known member
You are the one chanting, playing for the draw.Your word games won't work.
You are the one chanting, playing for the draw.Your word games won't work.
Some believe that @Into the Night is one of your socks (history is evidence).Now you are just repeating your moves, playing for the draw.
Too funny. Your argument rests on the denial of inalienable rights. Unless you have something to add that respects the inalienable rights guaranteed by the Constitution, we're done here.
You need a government refresher. Regulations are instructions on executing the law; they are not the law themselves.
1. You don't speak for most people.Most people are losing a fortune in their 401K's.
How effective do you rate yourself in "panic peddling"?And more will lose jobs because of this market crash.
Trump inherited an economy that We the People wanted to be made great. Did you miss the November election?Trump inherited a good & growing economy
Naturally you are a much better economist than Trump. You make so much sense when you put it that way.- and immediately trashed it w/ his dopey tariff idea,
... and of course you speak for economists. You probably also speak for accountants and scientists.which even conservative economists said would be a disaster.
@JPP - Would you be able to identify a TDS-infected strawberry who hasn't recovered from the November election and is still cowering quivering in his hive-mind collective safe-space babbling incoherently about his trauma-induced delusions?He's a bad President, Earl. He'd lose if the election was held today.
You only get to speak for you. Are you that believer?Some believe that @Into the Night is one of your socks (history is evidence).
Too funny! According to AProudLefty's math, Trump's 312 votes is somehow not the majority when compared to Harris' 226 votes. Does somebody wish to clue him in, or otherwise teach him basic arithmetic?Remember that Trump didn't win the majority of votes?
In order to it being a majority, it has to be over 50%.Too funny! According to AProudLefty's math, Trump's 312 votes is somehow not the majority when compared to Harris' 226 votes. Does somebody wish to clue him in, or otherwise teach him basic arithmetic?
Let's do the math: 312 + 226 = 538. Half = 269. 312 is 43 more than half. Trump laid down the hurt.In order to it being a majority, it has to be over 50%.
Apparently you do not understand the percentages and the Electoral College.Let's do the math: 312 + 226 = 538. Half = 269. 312 is 43 more than half. Trump laid down the hurt.
But the true American big picture is this:
![]()
Can anyone imagine what it would be like if we adjusted for Democrat cheating?
So, when Harvard CAPS-Harris conducts a more recent poll, I will post it.That poll is 3 weeks old - right?
These far left loons believe that in order to win the presidency, one must have a majority of the popular vote.Let's do the math: 312 + 226 = 538. Half = 269. 312 is 43 more than half. Trump laid down the hurt.
But the true American big picture is this:
![]()
Can anyone imagine what it would be like if we adjusted for Democrat cheating?
AND you duck...So where's the charge?
Utterly bullshit and wishful thinking on your part.Most people are losing a fortune in their 401K's. And more will lose jobs because of this market crash.
Trump inherited a good & growing economy - and immediately trashed it w/ his dopey tariff idea, which even conservative economists said would be a disaster.
He's a bad President, Earl. He'd lose if the election was held today.
He's probably wondering why he's alone on the platform.Sit down, old man.
You are going to stroke out.
In the grand scheme of things, you are irrelevant.
The American people rejected loons like you.
The train left the station and left you behind.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! NOW you think the electoral college didn't vote for Trump??????Why do you keep bringing up a poll of Americans supporting Trump? Remember that Trump didn't win the majority of votes?
Mindless chanting.The American people voted for a better economy.
They're getting screwed.
Mindless chanting.Most people are losing a fortune in their 401K's. And more will lose jobs because of this market crash.
Trump inherited a good & growing economy - and immediately trashed it w/ his dopey tariff idea, which even conservative economists said would be a disaster.
He's a bad President, Earl. He'd lose if the election was held today.
Also by Democrats.An act of sedition requires an actual act of violence. What act did she commit?
Your argument that simply talking results in conspiracy to commit sedition would mean that in 4 years everyone involved with Jan 6th could be indicted for conspiracy to commit sedition since the statute of limitations for conspiracy is 10 years.
It's not speech. The 1st amendment is not involved.I guess you missed the first amendment which says that speech isn't a crime.
She did know.What actual act did she commit. Making a video is not a crime. Aiding and abetting requires an actual act helping a specific criminal. The law for aiding and abetting a person in the country illegally requires that one knows that specific person is in the country illegally.
RQAA. Pay attention.Since you keep claiming she committed a crime, cite the actual statute she violated. Title and section.
Inversion fallacy.Now you are just repeating your moves, playing for the draw.
There is no right to support criminal activity.Too funny. Your argument rests on the denial of inalienable rights. Unless you have something to add that respects the inalienable rights guaranteed by the Constitution, we're done here.
Regulations are law.You need a government refresher. Regulations are instructions on executing the law; they are not the law themselves.
Inversion fallacy.You are the one chanting, playing for the draw.