IBDaMann
Well-known member
We need to talk about this. I'm an atheist. I am vocal. How am I a genocider Nazi? ... or are you complimenting me on not lowering myself to being a fascist globalist genocider Nazi?all vocal atheists are genocider Nazis.
We need to talk about this. I'm an atheist. I am vocal. How am I a genocider Nazi? ... or are you complimenting me on not lowering myself to being a fascist globalist genocider Nazi?all vocal atheists are genocider Nazis.
I was overstating for fun.We need to talk about this. I'm an atheist. I am vocal. How am I a genocider Nazi? ... or are you complimenting me on not lowering myself to being a fascist globalist genocider Nazi?
Of course. We can both agree that atheism is not fascism ... although it might be globalist. Let me think about it.I was overstating for fun.
Am I a Libertarian Life-thriver?most vocal atheists are Nazi genociders.... but not you...... you're special.
I'm having trouble parsing this.which is sad because morality is rational but most atheists are eugenicist mass murderers, which is clearly an immoral worldview.
you'very dumb.Of course. We can both agree that atheism is not fascism ... although it might be globalist. Let me think about it.
Am I a Libertarian Life-thriver?
I'm having trouble parsing this.
Your first sentence is a regurgitation of a previous post that is more projection than addressing the key points of my responses.
Puh-leeze, Cy! Spare us this lame attempt at smoke blowing and dodging .... you're not smart enough or adept enough to pull it off (only the smiling joker you see in the mirror nods in approval of your tactic). THIS ENTIRE THREAD IS BASED UPON DISCUSSION OF THOSE WHO REJECT (wait for it) RELIGION AND THE CONCEPT OF GOD AS BEING SOMEONE TO FEAR! YOU attempted to caste all atheists as prone to be (and I'll cut you some slack by inserting "potentially") morally deficient based on their beliefs. I correctly pointed out that "moralism" is no more or less imbued in human beings regardless of whether they are religious, atheist or agnostic ... as I pointed out the historic records of whole sale murder in the name of religion (i.e. Crusades, Jihads, Inquisition, America's and Australia's "Native" schools).
Now you keep waffling and BS'ing, name dropping objective/subjective morality do bolster your basic intention.
I'll dumb it down for you with regards to the subject title of this thread; THERE IS NO MORE NEED TO FEAR ATHEISM THAN THERE IS TO FEAR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OR AGNOSTIC BELIEFS. EVERYONE IS CAPABLE OF GOOD OR EVIL. SO THE VERY PREMISE OF THE OP IS INACCURATE AT BEST.
Got that, Cy? Because if you agree with that then we're pretty much done here. But if you continue to try and split a hair or claim I staged something that doesn't exist in the chronology of the posts, then you're just being insipidly stubborn with a heavy dose of foolish pride. Carry on.
He lies about being a Christian. Sad.Sadly, on certain issues it would seem so.
That would be you.Allergic to integrity and honesty, are you? The type of person who can't admit a mistake?
You have no idea what "objective" means.What I see on this thread are atheists trying to claim they believe in objective morality, without having to call it objective morality.
Plato and Socrates believed in objective morality and values, and they weren't Christian, Jewish, or Muslim.He lies about being a Christian. Sad.
Easy. That which is beyond human opinion - what Plato called doxa- and is inherent to reality or nature itselfYou have no idea what "objective" means.
So, science is the only way to be objective?Easy. That which is beyond human opinion - what Plato called doxa- and is inherent to reality or nature itself
I see. So, I do not accept Plato since he offers no proof--just belief.Plato and Socrates believed in objective morality and values,
How is objectivity inherent to nature?Easy. That which is beyond human opinion - what Plato called doxa- and is inherent to reality or nature itself
No, Christianity is essential to thread since it is the only system of morality which claims to come from God.Christianity is irrelevant to the thread. It only appears in the thread because you have an emotional hostility to it.
We 've already doneSo you can't even admit I said nothing about religion, even though you tried to claim I did. Are you a drug addict?
Allergic to integrity and honesty, are you? The type of person who can't admit a mistake?
I've been asking this for two years and have never gotten a credible answer: how do electrons and quarks have innate objective morality and knowledge of absolute right and wrong?
They don't.
If all that exists is matter and energy, and humans are just collections of quarks and electrons, then all our values and morals are just based on opinion and popular consensus. That by definition is subjective morality. There is no possible to tap dance your way into spinning that as objective morality based on an innate and universal value of absolute right and wrong.
What I see on this thread are atheists trying to claim they believe in objective morality, without having to call it objective morality.
Cypress repeats the same thing over and over for years.We already that dance, Cy. You're tripping over your own insipidly stubborn & lame attemptsat word play. I'll leave you to it.
The only people bringing up Christianity in this thread is you.We 've already done
that dance, Cy. You're tripping over your own insipidly stubborn & lame attempts
at word play. I'll leave you to it.
Too funny!you'very dumb.
Apology accepted.I'm sorry.