WinterBorn
Verified User
No thanks.
I'm confident the material is there for people who care enough to look into it.
we both know the truth already.
![]()
Yes we do. We both know I didn't say what you claim I did. And we both know you went back searching.
No thanks.
I'm confident the material is there for people who care enough to look into it.
we both know the truth already.
![]()
No thanks.
I'm confident the material is there for people who care enough to look into it.
we both know the truth already.
![]()
I see it differently, as you might imagine.Yes we do. We both know I didn't say what you claim I did. And we both know you went back searching.
I see it differently, as you might imagine.
You said abusing children is a private matter.I'm sure that helps.
I see facts. I see you claiming I said something that I did not say. I see you refusing to post a link or a quote.
And I see you refusing to admit you lied.
You said abusing children is a private matter.
I simply insist that you live with and accept the consequences of atheism and physical materialism: morals are subjective, there is no ultimate purpose or meaning in life, all that exists is matter and energy, evil ultimately wins, all our beliefs, thoughts, and emotions are simply just biochemical reactions fine-tuned by millions of years of evolution, and human free will does not exist.Seems that when people (even on JPP) have something more akin to fear of atheists than simple dislike.
I simply insist that you live with and accept the consequences of atheism and physical materialism:
That's an intellectual argument, it's not fear or hate.
This is false. The fact you refuse to discuss this means you prefer to lie.I simply insist that you live with and accept the consequences of atheism and physical materialism: morals are subjective, about atheism.
That's how atheism is defined by history's most famous atheist intellectuals, from Nietchze, to Sartre, to Camus, to Schopenhauer, to Richard Dawkins. It's not me defining it.Let me correct you: You want atheist to accept the consequences YOU specify for atheism.
Nietzsche never argues morals are subjective.That's how atheism is defined by history's most famous atheist intellectuals, from Nietchze,
He most definitely said that there is no objective morality.Nietzsche never argues morals are subjective.
You only play word games. As usual, a waste of time.He most definitely said that there is no objective morality.
We can play word games until the cows come home, but at the end of the day if there is no objective morality, then morals are subjective.
You think Christian ethics are the only possible ethics that are not "subjective." This is false and easily refutedHe most definitely said that there is no objective morality.
We can play word games until the cows come home, but at the end of the day if there is no objective morality, then morals are subjective.
I don't know why atheists on this board are so keen to run away from subjective morality, when every major atheist intellectual I have read about denies objective morality and denies absolute right and wrong.You think Christian ethics are the only possible ethics that are not "subjective." This is false and easily refuted
I'll just pull out a cornerstone of your screed here: morals are subjectiveI simply insist that you live with and accept the consequences of atheism and physical materialism: morals are subjective, there is no ultimate purpose or meaning in life, all that exists is matter and energy, evil ultimately wins, all our beliefs, thoughts, and emotions are simply just biochemical reactions fine-tuned by millions of years of evolution, and human free will does not exist.
That's an intellectual argument, it's not fear or hate.
There's a possibility atheism is even correct, I have never ruled that out.
If you find your discomfort level rising at the thought of accepting the price and consequences of atheism, maybe you need to reflect on what you actually believe about atheism.
I never said anything of the sort. A moral subjectivist can still hold the opinion that killing Jews in death camps is wrong, or that child abuse is wrong.I'll just pull out a cornerstone of your screed here: morals are subjective
Says who? How do you spray paint anyone who is a self professed atheist as being "immoral"?
Cy, you can't BS when there's a printed record. You stated, " I simply insist that you live with and accept the consequences of atheism and physical materialism: morals are subjective,..."I never said anything of the sort. A moral subjectivist can still hold the opinion that killing Jews in death camps is wrong, or that child abuse is wrong.
Cy, you can't BS when there's a printed record. You stated, " I simply insist that you live with and accept the consequences of atheism and physical materialism: morals are subjective,..."
You can't have it both ways, Cy. Nor can you ignore the logic of the rest of what I said in Post 76