Yakuda
Verified User
Like joe "the idiot" Biden?!
“Top Trump Officials Debated War Plans With Journalist”
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
AKA the turnip.
Oh, please, all you have is what about Hillary. Jeebus…
Were war plans shared in a group chat with randoms in it?
I can find no article that states the FBI stated Hillary’s emails were hacked. Do you have a source for your information?
FBI: No evidence Clinton server hacked despite Trump tweet
The FBI says it has no evidence Hillary Clinton's private email server was compromised even though President Donald Trump tweeted a news report that alleged the Chinese had hacked it.
apnews.com
“The FBI has not found any evidence the servers were compromised,” an FBI official said in a statement sent to reporters inquiring about Mr. Trump’s recent claim.”
Last edited:
I thought he was anti war? He sure likes to bomb Yeman! Is this by Saudi orders?
No, she may have exposed, zero proof anything was actually exposed, however here, we have proof that secret war plans were exposed just prior to an actual attack, the two are beyond comparison
Once again, there is no proof the Emails exposed anything, in fact, the two under question were focused on the results of previous drone strikes, and not sent prior to any strike as we have here now. In addition, the FBI determined that there existed no evidence that anything with the emails ever threatened the US’s national security
As noted, the whataboutism isn’t even in the same ballpark
Hillary was investigated for over a year in public. This calls for a bigger and deeper investigation. Trump put unqualified people in charge and this is what you get.
Well we both know that ain’t going to happen, in fact, the only “investigating” will be on who they find to scapegoat
Would seem to be for King Saud.
Arnaud Bertrand
@RnaudBertrand
Subscribe
Another likely possibility that I see almost no-one discussing, given the fact that The Atlantic and Jeffrey Goldberg specifically are indeed a core part of the pro-war propaganda apparatus, is that this is actually a pro-war propaganda psyop.When something is a bit too incredible to be real, the first logical thing you ought to ask yourself is whether it's real...And when you look at the conversation, it's a bit too "on message" and too caricatural to pass the sniff test: the conversation is basically "we bomb the Houthis to help restore freedom of navigation out of the goodness of our hearts; we bail Europeans again, these free-loaders owe us big time", topped with three emojis (a fist, an American flag, and fire) to pat themselves on the back when they've bombed Muslims in the Middle-East yet again.I mean, seriously? So either they really are this cartoonishly simplistic, with just as little sophistication in their private deliberations as they do in public (with the added bonus of the incompetence at play in handling military information), in which case it's legitimately scary, or this is staged propaganda designed to shape the narrative around Yemen strikes.One thing is certain though, the fact that almost no Western media that I could identify asks this obvious question, and instead automatically and uncritically assumes this is real shows that for one the Western media ecosystem is in fact as cartoonishly simplistic and incompetent as we think they are.(This is obviously not meant to be a critique of
@NathanJRobinson
and
@curaffairs
who are actually one of the rare good ones, I do this as an RT of him because he was one of the only ones to raise the fact that The Atlantic is a core part of the pro-war propaganda apparatus).
Gunther Eagleman™
@GuntherEagleman
Subscribe
Tulsi Gabbard confirmed that ZERO classified information was sharedd in the Signal group.I laugh at anyone who wholeheartedly believes ANYTHING from the Atlantic.
----------------------------------------------------
It was a great mag once......now it is a propaganda rag.
@GuntherEagleman
Subscribe
Tulsi Gabbard confirmed that ZERO classified information was sharedd in the Signal group.I laugh at anyone who wholeheartedly believes ANYTHING from the Atlantic.
----------------------------------------------------
It was a great mag once......now it is a propaganda rag.
Perfect, blame the messenger, I think your Red Hat Clubbers call that an ad hominem fallacy
And if you listened to any of their testimony today in the Senate hearing you’d know that Pascal, Radcliffe, and Gabbard confirmed that the plans to drone the Houthi, where and when, hours before it occurred, was openly discussed on the chat, ah, most would consider that classified information regardless of what Gabbard now claims
As I said yesterday I have been very disappointed with Gabbart......if she is lying here it is one more reason to be disappointed.
Max Blumenthal on Judge Nap says that the only thing that makes sense is that Goldberg was added by mistake. I doubt it. He is a hard core Zionist War Pig, I think that the Trump team assumed that he is on their side. But the Atlantic is rabidly anti-MAGA, Goldberg is a rather senior Swamp Creature, that he would rat them out should surprise no one.
She is only one of the incompetent, Hegseth is blame, he is the Secretary of Defense, that’s what happens when you entrust the defense of the country to a TV talking head
Did Felonious even know about it? It seems he doesn’t know what he’s signing or what his cabinet is doing! This is worse than Reagan!!!!
, No one without a security clearance should be on this kind of chat. End of story.