Ah, no, 14th Amendment covers everyone, citizen or not
ANY PERSON...
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
The Constitution also does not say we have any right to privacy, nor that a President has immunity, now does that mean privacy doesn’t exist nor the President isn’t immune?That's what the Constitution says dumbass.
Why all the brainless lie filled strawmen?
Have you ever made a comment that wasn't full of lies, stupidity, ignorance and lunacy? Not to mention grade school.
You ought to buy a mirror before you start throwing around the play yard insults
Knuckles Neanderthal
Interdimensional
So you stumped eh Nibblet?
Knuckles Neanderthal
Interdimensional
The Constitution is written for Americans. The founding fathers were not globalists.
And not quite how that is suppose to relate to the 14th Amendment, especially give the 14th Amendment came a hundred years later, and in 1776 no one was globalists, that is why they fought pointless wars endlessly, you do know this is the 21st Century, correct?
No, because in the very proximate sentence they refer to US Citizens relating to other rights. Get an education!
They use the words they used on purpose, ANY PERSON means ANY PERSON.
Silly, there are plenty of historical cases of the Constitution being violated. You listed a few.
ANY PERSON
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Can you not read? The framers of the 14th intentionally defined three separate groups and identified different rights for each group.
Can you not read? The framers of the 14th intentionally defined three separate groups and identified different rights for each group.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Can you not read? The framers of the 14th intentionally defined three separate groups and identified different rights for each group.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Can you not read? The framers of the 14th intentionally defined three separate groups and identified different rights for each group.
Idiot!
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Can you not read? The framers of the 14th intentionally defined three separate groups and identified different rights for each group.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
^^^
Another MAGAt white nationalist who doesn't understand history.
The Constitutional Rights of Noncitizens | The Libertarian Institute
Immigration restrictionists sometimes claim that noncitizens have no rights under the Constitution, and that the US government is therefore free to deal with them in whatever way it wants. At least as a general rule, this claim is simply false. Noncitizens undeniably have a wide range of rights...
libertarianinstitute.org
Are all non citizens protected under the Bill of Rights?
Regardless of your immigration status, you have guaranteed rights under the Constitution. Learn more here about your rights as an immigrant, and how to express
legalknowledgebase.com
Do undocumented immigrants have constitutional rights?
The Constitution protects all people living in the United States, regardless of immigration status. Most constitutional provisions apply based on personhood, not citizenship. In other words, if an individual is physically present in the US, they are entitled to the protections granted by the Constitution.SmarterthanYou
rebel
point out to the part of that Amendment where it specifically says US Citizens
SmarterthanYou
rebel
this is wrong. or do you believe that they could simply be executed on the street by the police as soon as they are found out?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
stop being a moron. you obviously don't understand why the Constitution was written
Knuckles Neanderthal
Interdimensional
14th amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments.25 It addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law at all levels of government.2 This amendment was a response to issues affecting freed slaves following the American Civil War, and its passage was bitterly contested.2The amendment grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States, including formerly enslaved people, and provides all citizens with equal protection under the laws.25 It also prohibits states from making laws that abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States, and from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.25
States of the defeated Confederacy were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment to regain representation in Congress.2 The amendment has been the basis for many landmark Supreme Court decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954; prohibiting racial segregation in public schools), Loving v. Virginia (1967; ending interracial marriage bans), and Roe v. Wade (1973; concerning reproductive rights).26
The amendment's provisions have been the foundation for significant legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.2
The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment excludes its application to children born of diplomatic representatives of a foreign state, children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation, or children of members of Indian tribes subject to tribal laws.7
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio and Senator Jacob Howard of Michigan intended that the amendment would extend the Bill of Rights to the states, but historians disagree on how widely this view was shared at the time.5
Despite its intentions, the Fourteenth Amendment did not initially extend the Bill of Rights to the states and failed to fully protect the rights of Black citizens during Reconstruction.5 However, the amendment's principles have been the basis for change in the 20th century.5
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
this does not prove your claim.........care to try again?