UnconstitutionalExpedited Removal
If u bypass a Port of Entry u lose rights and can be deported without a hearing... FACT....
MAGAts/neo-Nazis/White Nationalists believe only Euro-American males have Constitutional rights. You know, just like the Founders wrote. Never mind the intervening centuries since.Unconstitutional
Still a person.
Lying again.MAGAts/neo-Nazis/White Nationalists believe only Euro-American males have Constitutional rights. You know, just like the Founders wrote. Never mind the intervening centuries since.![]()
Then the problem is you. You have a reading comprehension deficit.this does not prove your claim.........care to try again?
An illegal alien being deported is not deprived of life, liberty, or property."nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;"
Supreme law of our land.
Results count.Lying again.
Nope. The 14th amendment only applies to the government.No, they're not, genius.
They're talking about US residents.
Rights do not come from a piece of paper.That part is regarding citizens of the Nation you brainless dunce.
Illegal aliens are neither citizens, nor do they have any constitutional rights. Their only right is to be deported back to where they came from and prevented from ever applying for legal entry.
SCOTUS is not the Constitution, Sybil.That's not what SCOTUS says. Why do you hate the Constitution? Have you ever sworn to support and defend it or are you a chickenshit draft-dodger like Pedo Don?
The 14th amendment applies to federal and State government, anchovies.Ah, no, 14th Amendment covers everyone, citizen or not
You think that he thinks a document is a group of people or vice versa?SCOTUS is not the Constitution, Sybil.
Random phrases. No apparent coherency. Nothing in the Constitution expires by age, anchovies.And not quite how that is suppose to relate to the 14th Amendment, especially give the 14th Amendment came a hundred years later, and in 1776 no one was globalists, that is why they fought pointless wars endlessly, you do know this is the 21st Century, correct?
He said as much.You think that he thinks a document is a group of people?
Inversion fallacy. You can't blame your word games on anybody else, Void.I mean, Shirley you wouldn't be the type of jackass to play retarded word games, would you?
The Constitution does discuss the right of privacy (it doesn't grant it) in the 1st, 4th, and 5th amendments.The Constitution also does not say we have any right to privacy,
See Article II.nor that a President has immunity,
Rights do not come from a piece of paper, anchovies.now does that mean privacy doesn’t exist nor the President isn’t immune?
What 'play yard insults', anchovies??????You ought to buy a mirror before you start throwing around the play yard insults
Really? In your own words, what is scotus and what are some of the things that scotus does?He said as much.
England had colonies throughout the world. The sun truly never set on the British Empire.And not quite how that is suppose to relate to the 14th Amendment, especially give the 14th Amendment came a hundred years later, and in 1776 no one was globalists, that is why they fought pointless wars endlessly, you do know this is the 21st Century, correct?
Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox, Pretender.No, because in the very proximate sentence they refer to US Citizens relating to other rights. Get an education!
I guess you cannot read, Pretender. They just be subjects of jurisdiction of the United States, not subjects of some other nation.All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Can you not read? The framers of the 14th intentionally defined three separate groups and identified different rights for each group.
SCOTUS is not the Constitution, Sybil.^^^
Another MAGAt white nationalist who doesn't understand history.
Noncitizens undeniably have a wide range of rights under the Constitution. Indeed, within the borders of the United States, they have most of the same rights as citizens do, and longstanding Supreme Court precedent bans most state laws discriminating against noncitizens. There is little if any serious controversy among experts over this matter.![]()
The Constitutional Rights of Noncitizens | The Libertarian Institute
Immigration restrictionists sometimes claim that noncitizens have no rights under the Constitution, and that the US government is therefore free to deal with them in whatever way it wants. At least as a general rule, this claim is simply false. Noncitizens undeniably have a wide range of rights...libertarianinstitute.org
Are all non citizens protected under the Bill of Rights?
Regardless of your immigration status, you have guaranteed rights under the Constitution. Learn more here about your rights as an immigrant, and how to expresslegalknowledgebase.com
Do undocumented immigrants have constitutional rights?
The Constitution protects all people living in the United States, regardless of immigration status. Most constitutional provisions apply based on personhood, not citizenship. In other words, if an individual is physically present in the US, they are entitled to the protections granted by the Constitution.