Activist Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers

[Truth Detector]

Another activist judge who doesn't know the Constitution falsely claiming that the Constitution divines birthright citizenship to any baby born regardless of legal status in the US.

Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers​

A federal judge in New Hampshire blocked President Donald Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship and granted nationwide class certification status to all infants impacted by the order on Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante said he will issue a written ruling by the end of the day further explaining his decision. The injunction also narrows down the scope of the class to infants, removing parents from the case.

Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers

U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante issued a preliminary injunction against Trump's birthright citizenship ban, ruling that deprivation of citizenship would create irreparable harm.

www.foxnews.com

 

[Truth Detector]

In his order, LaPlante ruled that deprivation of citizenship, as held by the 14th Amendment, and changes in long-standing policy would create "irreparable harm."

This is a dumb lie not based on the law and purely emotional pabulum.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Another activist judge who doesn't know the Constitution falsely claiming that the Constitution divines birthright citizenship to any baby born regardless of legal status in the US.

Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers​

A federal judge in New Hampshire blocked President Donald Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship and granted nationwide class certification status to all infants impacted by the order on Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante said he will issue a written ruling by the end of the day further explaining his decision. The injunction also narrows down the scope of the class to infants, removing parents from the case.

Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers

U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante issued a preliminary injunction against Trump's birthright citizenship ban, ruling that deprivation of citizenship would create irreparable harm.

www.foxnews.com

Poor TD doesn't understand the Supreme Court ruling.
How can a judge be activist if he acts in the way the Supreme Court told him to act? Was the conservative majority on the Supreme Court activist?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

In his order, LaPlante ruled that deprivation of citizenship, as held by the 14th Amendment, and changes in long-standing policy would create "irreparable harm."

This is a dumb lie not based on the law and purely emotional pabulum.

Perhaps you should try reading the Constitution some time rather than keeping your head up your ass, Poopiehead.

 

[Truth Detector]

Poor TD doesn't understand the Supreme Court ruling.'

Sad mental case doesn't have the slightest clue what he is whining about.

How can a judge be activist if he acts in the way the Supreme Court told him to act? Was the conservative majority on the Supreme Court activist?

The Supreme Court told him that illegals who drop a baby here, while breaking our laws, that their babies become citizens automatically? LINK to that stupid nonsense brainless wonder dunce.

 

[Truth Detector]

Perhaps you should try reading the Constitution some time rather than keeping your head up your ass, Poopiehead.

Perhaps you should try COMPREHENDING what the Constitution says dumbfuck.

Where does it say birthright citizenship? I can't find that part dumbfuck.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Sad mental case doesn't have the slightest clue what he is whining about.



The Supreme Court told him that illegals who drop a baby here, while breaking our laws, that their babies become citizens automatically? LINK to that stupid nonsense brainless wonder dunce.

You really are that stupid aren't you.
The Supreme Court said a national injunction was just fine if a class is certified as required by law. The judge certified the class as required by law and issued a national injunction.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Perhaps you should try COMPREHENDING what the Constitution says dumbfuck.

Where does it say birthright citizenship? I can't find that part dumbfuck.

It seems you don't understand the word "all."

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

 

[Tobytone]

Another activist judge who doesn't know the Constitution falsely claiming that the Constitution divines birthright citizenship to any baby born regardless of legal status in the US.

Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers​

A federal judge in New Hampshire blocked President Donald Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship and granted nationwide class certification status to all infants impacted by the order on Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante said he will issue a written ruling by the end of the day further explaining his decision. The injunction also narrows down the scope of the class to infants, removing parents from the case.

Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers

U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante issued a preliminary injunction against Trump's birthright citizenship ban, ruling that deprivation of citizenship would create irreparable harm.

www.foxnews.com

Let the games begin! Just imagine how upset the libtards will be if they lose this one too, lol. Invest in antipsychotics, I think there will be tremendous growth in that mental health sector for years to come.

 

[Truth Detector]

You really are that stupid aren't you.

I see that you are still mentally unhinged and lacking a brain.

The Supreme Court said a national injunction was just fine if a class is certified as required by law.

Yes, and that still doesn't make this decision less stupid, you brainless mentally unhinged dumbass.

The judge certified the class as required by law and issued a national injunction.

I don't care what the judge did, his decision is not based on law or the Constitution and like all the other activist laughably stupid decisions from Obama and Biden nominees, will get overturned on appeal.

But hey, stupid dumbfucks like you don't know they are stupid dumbfucks and can't logically follow the threads premise. Now run along you mentally challenged halfwit.

 

[Truth Detector]

It seems you don't understand the word "all."

It appears that you don't understand much of anything.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
Look that one up and get back to me when you comprehend the OBVIOUS dumbfuck.

The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause contains two requirements for obtaining U.S. citizenship by birth: (1) the birth must have occurred within the United States; and (2) the person born must be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Birthright citizenship in the United States is not universal, as the Citizenship Clause makes it clear that birth on U.S. soil, alone, is not sufficient.

 

[Truth Detector]

Let the games begin! Just imagine how upset the libtards will be if they lose this one too, lol. Invest in antipsychotics, I think there will be tremendous growth in that mental health sector for years to come.

The reason they keep on losing is because their arguments are nothing but dumb lies and wishful thinking.

But it begs the real question here; why is it that they want to support ILLEGAL aliens and make their babies citizens?

We know why the Democratic Party wants it. They are counted in the census and increases their representation in the House under the semi-truthful belief they will be reliable Democrat voters in the future.

 

[Tobytone]

The reason they keep on losing is because their arguments are nothing but dumb lies and wishful thinking.

But it begs the real question here; why is it that they want to support ILLEGAL aliens and make their babies citizens?

We know why the Democratic Party wants it. They are counted in the census and increases their representation in the House under the semi-truthful belief they will be reliable Democrat voters in the future.

You’re spot on, the dems in power know this, but their mindless followers are just bleating along, infected with a terminal case of TDS, that’s rotting their brains. They’re too dim to understand the real endgame, mindlessly marching to their overlords’ tune like sheep begging for a shear. It’s the same old story, just like when their ancestors fought tooth and nail against the Constitution to keep slavery thriving.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It appears that you don't understand much of anything.



and subject to the jurisdiction thereof
Look that one up and get back to me when you comprehend the OBVIOUS dumbfuck.

The 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause contains two requirements for obtaining U.S. citizenship by birth: (1) the birth must have occurred within the United States; and (2) the person born must be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Birthright citizenship in the United States is not universal, as the Citizenship Clause makes it clear that birth on U.S. soil, alone, is not sufficient.

Subject to the jurisdiction has a specific meaning and that meaning must make sense every time that phrase is used.
The phrase is also used in the 13th amendment. If we accept your definition then the 13th amendment makes no sense.
The phrase subject to the jurisdiction thereof is also used in the 18th amendment. The 18th amendment becomes even more absurd if we accept your definition.

Can you tell us how a territory can be subject to the jurisdiction thereof using your idiotic definition. Subject to the jurisdiction means that US laws apply. If US laws do not apply to someone then they can not be arrested or tried in the US.

 

[Truth Detector]

You’re spot on, the dems in power know this, but their mindless followers are just bleating along, infected with a terminal case of TDS, that’s rotting their brains. They’re too dim to understand the real endgame, mindlessly marching to their overlords’ tune like sheep begging for a shear. It’s the same old story, just like when their ancestors fought tooth and nail against the Constitution to keep slavery thriving.

Yes they are. It's actually sad, but at the same time, wonderful to watch. With the party supporting everything Americans are against, their chances become even lower to win elections for the next decade or so.

 

[Truth Detector]

Subject to the jurisdiction has a specific meaning and that meaning must make sense every time that phrase is used.

It does. It means that if you are a citizen of another country, you are not subject to our jurisdiction. Therefore, your only recourse is leaving or being deported.

The phrase is also used in the 13th amendment. If we accept your definition then the 13th amendment makes no sense.
The phrase subject to the jurisdiction thereof is also used in the 18th amendment. The 18th amendment becomes even more absurd if we accept your definition.

Translation: blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah

Can you tell us how a territory can be subject to the jurisdiction thereof using your idiotic definition. Subject to the jurisdiction means that US laws apply. If US laws do not apply to someone then they can not be arrested or tried in the US.

Can you explain why you are such an uneducated, brainless halfwit who cannot comprehend plain English?

My guess is more blabbering and flailing is coming.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It does. It means that if you are a citizen of another country, you are not subject to our jurisdiction. Therefore, your only recourse is leaving or being deported.

I see. Foreigners are not subject to US jurisdiction in your view. That means foreigners are not subject to US laws based on the meaning of jurisdiction. It also means that a citizen of one state of the US is not subject to the laws of another state when they visit it.

Translation: blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah

Translation: You have the reading comprehension of a 6 year old.

Can you explain why you are such an uneducated, brainless halfwit who cannot comprehend plain English?

Explain how Article IV says a state has jurisdiction for a crime but your definition means a foreign persons in that state are not subject to that state's jurisdiction for any crime they might commit.
Explain how the court's in Art III have jurisdiction for all lawsuits involving foreigners and the US government but the US doesn't have any jurisdiction when it comes to foreigners.
I look forward to your intelligent answer since you seem to think you comprehend plain English.

My guess is more blabbering and flailing is coming.

We all know you will keep blabbering and flailing. You don't need to guess since it's what you do 99.9% of the time.

 

[Truth Detector]

I see. Foreigners are not subject to US jurisdiction in your view. That means foreigners are not subject to US laws based on the meaning of jurisdiction. It also means that a citizen of one state of the US is not subject to the laws of another state when they visit it.

You don't "see" much of anything halfwit. It means they are subjects of other nations, you brainless dumbass.

Translation: You have the reading comprehension of a 6 year old.

Projection

The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.

Explain how Article IV says a state has jurisdiction for a crime but your definition means a foreign persons in that state are not subject to that state's jurisdiction for any crime they might commit.

Article Four does not apply to aliens who are citizens of other nations you brainless dumbass.

Explain how the court's in Art III have jurisdiction for all lawsuits involving foreigners and the US government but the US doesn't have any jurisdiction when it comes to foreigners.

Article Three does not apply to aliens who are citizens of other nations you brainless dumbass.

I look forward to your intelligent answer since you seem to think you comprehend plain English.

I wish you had intelligence. Then you wouldn't vote for morons like Biden and Kamala.

We all know you will keep blabbering and flailing. You don't need to guess since it's what you do 99.9% of the time.

Projection

The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.

 

[FastLane]

I see. Foreigners are not subject to US jurisdiction in your view. That means foreigners are not subject to US laws based on the meaning of jurisdiction. It also means that a citizen of one state of the US is not subject to the laws of another state when they visit it.

Translation: You have the reading comprehension of a 6 year old.

Explain how Article IV says a state has jurisdiction for a crime but your definition means a foreign persons in that state are not subject to that state's jurisdiction for any crime they might commit.
Explain how the court's in Art III have jurisdiction for all lawsuits involving foreigners and the US government but the US doesn't have any jurisdiction when it comes to foreigners.
I look forward to your intelligent answer since you seem to think you comprehend plain English.

We all know you will keep blabbering and flailing. You don't need to guess since it's what you do 99.9% of the time.

Why was the Snyder Act needed?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

You don't "see" much of anything halfwit. It means they are subjects of other nations, you brainless dumbass.



Projection

The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.



Article Four does not apply to aliens who are citizens of other nations you brainless dumbass.



Article Three does not apply to aliens who are citizens of other nations you brainless dumbass.



I wish you had intelligence. Then you wouldn't vote for morons like Biden and Kamala.



Projection

The process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another.

You certainly didn't disappoint when it comes to blabbering and flailing.

Art IV applies to citizens of US states. A person that commits a crime in Texas that is found in California is to be returned to Texas to face prosecution for those crimes according to Art IV.
The fourteenth amendment says a person born in California is a citizen of California.
You argue that a citizen of one state or country is not subject to the laws if they retain their allegiance to where they are citizens.
That would mean a citizen of California can go to Texas, murder multiple people and not be subject to the jurisdiction of Texas since they are not a citizen of Texas under the US Constitution.

Art IV says the Texas is the jurisdiction where the crime occurred. The 14th amendment says a person who lives in California is not a Texas citizen. Your position is that a non citizen is not subject to the jurisdiction. I realize you might have to have the reading comprehension of a 12 year old to see how your logic fails so I'm sure you won't disappoint us again with your response.



Article III certainly applies to foreigners since it specifically mentions them.

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.