Into the Night
Verified User
Random words...no apparent coherency. Go learn English.When you When you assume
Random words...no apparent coherency. Go learn English.When you When you assume
Why not,where does it condemn homosexuality?That won't work, Maggot. You cannot justify homosexual behavior by using the Bible.
English???? I speak AmericanRandom words...no apparent coherency. Go learn English.
'Murica! FUCK YEAH!English???? I speak American! Motherfucker!
Some are direct, others are indirect, but all are logically applicable:Why not,where does it condemn homosexuality?
Chapter and Verse
Why not,where does it condemn homosexuality?
Chapter and Verse
Some are direct, others are indirect, but all are logically applicable:
Genesis 1:27-28
Genesis 2:24
Leviticus 18:22
Leviticus 20:13
Mark 10:6-9
Romans 1:26-28
1st Corinthians 6:9-10
1st Corinthians 7:2
Jude 1:7
The Bible considers such behavior to be immoral (a deviation from God's design for procreation)
That's Jewish Law! That Rabbis translate as applying to male penetrationHow else does one read Lev 20:13?
That's Jewish Law! That Rabbis translate as applying to male penetration
I've never seen a homophobic that didn't have self loathing because of their suppressed homosexual desires.Pagans used to burn them at the stake, hence the term 'faggot', or they tied them up and dropped them in bogs.
AI Overview
Based on historical accounts, some groups in ancient pagan societies did execute homosexuals
.
The Roman historian Tacitus reported that Germanic tribes would execute those who "disgracefully abuse their bodies" and sink them in swamps. Archaeological evidence of bodies found in peat bogs in Denmark and northern Germany, some strangled before being drowned, may corroborate these accounts.
The New Testament is "Jewish Law"? Please explain...That's Jewish Law!
This is an incoherent sentence fragment. Try rephrasing it in English.That Rabbis translate as applying to male penetration
How is a birth anomaly immoral?Some are direct, others are indirect, but all are logically applicable:
Genesis 1:27-28
Genesis 2:24
Leviticus 18:22
Leviticus 20:13
Mark 10:6-9
Romans 1:26-28
1st Corinthians 6:9-10
1st Corinthians 7:2
Jude 1:7
The Bible considers such behavior to be immoral (a deviation from God's design for procreation)
You clearly missed the word BEHAVIOR... Temptation itself is not a sin, but acting upon that temptation IS a sin.How is a birth anomaly immoral?
You can't see anything; you remain blind.I can see that I haven't missed anything by not reading the Bible.
That's Jewish Law!
That Rabbis translate as applying to male penetration
NoThe New Testament is "Jewish Law"? Please explain...
Additionally, The Bible (OT + NT) is a cohesive and intertwined whole. You cannot remove parts of it from its context, add to it, or subtract from it.
This is an incoherent sentence fragment. Try rephrasing it in English.
Leviticus, is,was,always will be Jewish Law!Agreed. It is very straightforward in its condemnation of one choosing to act upon one's homosexual desires.
@Margot This condemnation in Leviticus has NOT been abolished. God's nature NEVER changes.
Define that word!Are you a Dispensationalist?
My point exactly, applies only to Male on Male penetration! That's the Abomination in Leviticus!So why did Jesus say: "For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in any wise pass from the law till all be fulfilled." ?
Why does THAT matter? Isn't that a form of homosexuality? Isn't that integral to at least 25-50% of gay people having sex?
Define that wordAre you a Dispensationalist?
Define that word