Activist Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers

Yet I've posted and quoted it, whilst you build straw man fallacies.
If you quoted it then you didn't read it. The ruling says that rule 23 allows a court to do what a universal injunction can't, grant complete relief to an entire class.

(e) When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too. The Government’s applications for partial stays of the preliminary injunctions are granted, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue. P.26.

Rule 23requires numerosity (such that joinder is impracticable), commonquestions of law or fact, typicality, and representative partieswho adequately protect the interests of the class. Fed. Rule Civ.Proc. 23(a). The requirements for a bill of peace were virtuallyidentical. See 7A Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure §1751, at10 and n. 4.
By forging a shortcut to relief that benefits parties and non parties alike, universal injunctions impermissibly circumvent Rule 23’s procedural protections. Pp. 12–15.
 
Another activist judge who doesn't know the Constitution falsely claiming that the Constitution divines birthright citizenship to any baby born regardless of legal status in the US.

Federal judge blocks Trump's birthright citizenship ban for all infants, testing lower court powers

A federal judge in New Hampshire blocked President Donald Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship and granted nationwide class certification status to all infants impacted by the order on Thursday.

U.S. District Judge Joseph LaPlante said he will issue a written ruling by the end of the day further explaining his decision. The injunction also narrows down the scope of the class to infants, removing parents from the case.


Definitions of an "activist judge": It's when a trumptard doesn't get their way!
 
If you quoted it then you didn't read it. The ruling says that rule 23 allows a court to do what a universal injunction can't, grant complete relief to an entire class.

(e) When a court concludes that the Executive Branch has acted unlawfully, the answer is not for the court to exceed its power, too. The Government’s applications for partial stays of the preliminary injunctions are granted, but only to the extent that the injunctions are broader than necessary to provide complete relief to each plaintiff with standing to sue. P.26.

Rule 23requires numerosity (such that joinder is impracticable), commonquestions of law or fact, typicality, and representative partieswho adequately protect the interests of the class. Fed. Rule Civ.Proc. 23(a). The requirements for a bill of peace were virtuallyidentical. See 7A Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure §1751, at10 and n. 4.
By forging a shortcut to relief that benefits parties and non parties alike, universal injunctions impermissibly circumvent Rule 23’s procedural protections. Pp. 12–15.
There is no class including everyone in the United States in a courtroom. NO court has any authority to change the Constitution, create a law, or override Congress or a legislature (other than to repeal a law in order to conform with a constitution).
 
Back
Top