Based Chad
Was it me?
you;ve been lied to, dumb goyim.What the literal fuck??????
No one needs your "insight", Adolf.
you;ve been lied to, dumb goyim.What the literal fuck??????
No one needs your "insight", Adolf.
you;ve been lied to, dumb goyim.
I'm keep science pure.Why do you Nazis need to fuck up every place you show up in? Can you just keep the nazi shit to yourself? Even for a little bit? Fuckin' Nazis everywhere these days.
I'm keep science pure.
Time in Ohio runs slightly differently than time does in high Earth orbit.3:30 in Ohio will always be 3:30 in Ohio
you're on some useless shit.
that's telemetry calculations.Time in Ohio runs slightly differently than time does in high Earth orbit.
That's why GPS satellites have to be programmed with relativistic corrections. Otherwise your GPS location would incrementally incur errors and would be way off within a few hours or days.
There was never a promise made to you that physics would be easy. A good basic knowledge of the framework of physics are only available to people who had some physics background in college, or those who are well read in popular science books and science journalism.
Great pivot to going off the deep end.So, unable to refute my statement that the behavior of matter and energy is lawful and predictable, you instead elected to masturbate and play some word game about Issac Newton.
Newton's law of gravity was certainly Newton's law of gravity. If you are electing to masturbate and to play some word game about what isn't the law of gravity, please find one that wastes less time and bandwidth.Newton's insight was not the law of gravity.
You don't speak for what Aristotle knew. In fact, you don't speak for any dead people.Aristotle knew gravity was lawful and cause-based.
Yes, which is what everone has been telling you. I guess you are only now getting around to accepting it.Newton's insight was that there is a universal law of gravity that explains both motion on Earth and in the heavens, based on an inverse square relationship.
Newton's law of gravity is still strictly correct. I have given you the correct answer. You aren't smart enough to figure it out ... even when it has been told to you.Newton's law of universal gravitation is no longer strictly correct,
Nope, it has been accompanied by General Relativity.and has been replaced by the field equations of general relativity.
Newton's law gives correct answers. You have to use the right tool for the right job.However, Newton's 17th century inverse square law still gives excellent approximations,
It can be used by engineers to build things, because like all other science, it has not yet been found to be in error in any way. Perhaps you have noticed that Newton's law of gravity has not been discarded from the body of science, which it would if it were only giving (erroneous) estimates instead of correct answers.and can be used in undergraduate physics classes,
For sending people to Mars you would want Einstein's model. I explained why previously; hopefully you were paying attention.or for sending probes to Mars.
Newton's law of gravity assumes a single reference frame. Once you have multiple reference frames, you want Einstein's model. If you have only one reference frame, you certainly do not want to be using Einstein's model if you can help it.Newton's inverse square law really starts to give incorrect answers in the presence of extremely dense mass and/or for objects moving at relativistic speeds.
that's telemetry calculations.
the orbit circumference is different on a geo orbital satellite versus the surface of the earth.
nothing to do with relativity lies.
GPS satellites require much more than mere programmed corrections.Time in Ohio runs slightly differently than time does in high Earth orbit. That's why GPS satellites have to be programmed with relativistic corrections.
GPS satellites need regular "synchronization" from ground stations. Even then, there is no way to guarantee a perfect synchronization between different reference frames.Otherwise your GPS location would incrementally incur errors and would be way off within a few hours or days.
but not general relativity calculations.C'mon, dude, this is understood by everyone. GPS involves relativistic calculations.
Don't be an idiot. EVERYONE except you seems to know this. Everyone has seen the experiment where they put an atomic clock on a jet and flew it to prove that time dilation exists.
Don't make stupid arguments. C'mon. You can do better and if you can't the STFU, please.
but not general relativity calculations.
fact.
you;re dumb
general relativity has no bearing on telemetry calculations.Dude, c'mon, you just look like a moron when you take these "anti-science" positions. I get it. It's a game you are playing, you are playing "edge lord" today but you picked the wrong thing to be an edgelord about.
Might as well argue that 2+2 doesn't equal 4. You would look exactly as intelligent.
Slow your roll, pick your battles and try to have a decent conversation. All of JPP is nothing but a cess pit and these science conversations are literally the ONLY place someone can speak for more than 2 posts without it being stupid. You always fuck up every thread you enter for the same reasons.
Sit this one out please?
general relativity has no bearing on telemetry calculations.
So, a lot of words, but simply no refutation of three summary points I made:Great pivot to going off the deep end.
Newton's law of gravity was certainly Newton's law of gravity. If you are electing to masturbate and to play some word game about what isn't the law of gravity, please find one that wastes less time and bandwidth.
You don't speak for what Aristotle knew. In fact, you don't speak for any dead people.
Yes, which is what everone has been telling you. I guess you are only now getting around to accepting it.
Newton's law of gravity is still strictly correct. I have given you the correct answer. You aren't smart enough to figure it out ... even when it has been told to you.
Nope, it has been accompanied by General Relativity.
Newton's law gives correct answers. You have to use the right tool for the right job.
It can be used by engineers to build things, because like all other science, it has not yet been found to be in error in any way. Perhaps you have noticed that Newton's law of gravity has not been discarded from the body of science, which it would if it were only giving (erroneous) estimates instead of correct answers.
For sending people to Mars you would want Einstein's model. I explained why previously; hopefully you were paying attention.
Newton's law of gravity assumes a single reference frame. Once you have multiple reference frames, you want Einstein's model. If you have only one reference frame, you certainly do not want to be using Einstein's model if you can help it.
Good thing you're not an engineer tasked with designing and maintaining satellites.general relativity has no bearing on telemetry calculations.
So it has a logical form. Not the same as rational.No.
The behavior of physical matter and energy behaves lawfully and predictably and is therefore intelligible to human consciousness.
Indeed. They are nazis. Nihilists.Why do you Nazis need to fuck up every place you show up in? Can you just keep the nazi shit to yourself? Even for a little bit? Fuckin' Nazis everywhere these days.
Why are you abruptly changing topics? Why don't you thank me for correcting your rookie errors before we change topics to something else?So, a lot of words, but simply no refutation of three summary points I made:
The first two are correct. Your third assertion is bogus. Gravity is a force, not motion. Motion, i.e. kinetic energy, is caused by classical force accelerating a mass. Relativity has something to say about the amount a body is accelerated based on its velocity, but the resulting motion is caused by classical application of a force. Structural engineering, bridge design, and load-bearing analysis all use Newtonian statics exclusively, because Relativity cannot add any corrections when velocity is zero.The behavior of matter and energy are lawful and predictable
The fact that gravity is understood to be lawful and predictable has been known at least since Aristotle.
Gravity is motion caused by curvature/geometry of spacetime, not by any classical force.
Science isn't racist, NoName.they might have had their own individual theories.
often things are well know before the white man takes credit for it.
it is if you do human experimentation on the lesser races.Science isn't racist, NoName.