Oh stop.
The nose, lips, cheeks and possibly the chin are obviously altered.
A blind person can see it.
I'm not trying to change the mind of anyone about anything other than that she is not a good example of a "real woman" because what you see is not the real her.
It's the product of a cosmetic surgeon.
Well then in that case, we're going to have to trace the genesis of this topic back to it's start.
FlatLame started it by posting about the difference in appearance of leftist women versus rightie women...
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...ing-voters-fleeing-to-gop.236998/post-6608895
All of them, leftist women included, are assumed to be biological females.
Mearle responded with his comment on the women pictured in FlatLame's post
https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...ing-voters-fleeing-to-gop.236998/post-6608904
A few more moronic
"our women are hot while theirs are ugly" comments not worth quoting were tossed in, but none of them implied biological differences.
It was at that point, Mearle posted a link to a pic of Karoline Leavitt and suggested that she is what a "real woman" looks like.
Nobody had as of that point, suggested that the pictures of the SUPPOSEDLY leftist women were of biological males or trans women.
I simply pointed out that Leavitt is not actually a "real" woman, but rather a fake, cosmetically altered version of a former real woman.