Democrats alarmed over new data showing voters fleeing to GOP

giphy.gif
 
Seriously, the differences between those two images is far more likely due to age and makeup than it is due to surgery.
Oh stop.

The nose, lips, cheeks and possibly the chin are obviously altered.

A blind person can see it.
Almost nobody pays to get barely any change at all. However, if she did, it wouldn't matter to the dude that thinks she's "hot" and a "real woman"... It matters to you for some reason that I cannot figure out, and because it does you think it should change the mind of someone else who thinks she's "hot" and a "real woman".
I'm not trying to change the mind of anyone about anything other than that she is not a good example of a "real woman" because what you see is not the real her.

It's the product of a cosmetic surgeon.
I think that other person probably would be more concerned with whether or not she has or ever has had a penis if they used the words "real woman"...
Well then in that case, we're going to have to trace the genesis of this topic back to it's start.

FlatLame started it by posting about the difference in appearance of leftist women versus rightie women...

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...ing-voters-fleeing-to-gop.236998/post-6608895

All of them, leftist women included, are assumed to be biological females.

Mearle responded with his comment on the women pictured in FlatLame's post

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...ing-voters-fleeing-to-gop.236998/post-6608904

A few more moronic "our women are hot while theirs are ugly" comments not worth quoting were tossed in, but none of them implied biological differences.

It was at that point, Mearle posted a link to a pic of Karoline Leavitt and suggested that she is what a "real woman" looks like.

Nobody had as of that point, suggested that the pictures of the SUPPOSEDLY leftist women were of biological males or trans women.

I simply pointed out that Leavitt is not actually a "real" woman, but rather a fake, cosmetically altered version of a former real woman.
 
Nah your bitching and whining is tiresome.
Well luckily, we live in a free country, and you are not required to reply to my comments. If libtards had their way, I wouldn't be able to write those comments. It's one of the reasons your party will likely lose the mid-terms against historical norms. Just thought I'd bless you with a fun little prediction to brighten your Sunday. :)
 

Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony says a lot about our dystopia. That the US president needs a character certificate from a convicted criminal is quite befitting.​


I find it interesting all the folks that said that Ghislaine had incriminated Trump suddenly think that what she says doesn't matter... as interesting as the folks that think what she said here should matter thinking that it suddenly matters when before what she said had no bearing on reality.

She really does have a rooster in the cock fighting ring, because of that I trust anything at all that she says at this point as much as I trust any other convict with a rooster in the cock fighting ring.
 
Oh stop.

The nose, lips, cheeks and possibly the chin are obviously altered.

A blind person can see it.

I'm not trying to change the mind of anyone about anything other than that she is not a good example of a "real woman" because what you see is not the real her.

It's the product of a cosmetic surgeon.

Well then in that case, we're going to have to trace the genesis of this topic back to it's start.

FlatLame started it by posting about the difference in appearance of leftist women versus rightie women...

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...ing-voters-fleeing-to-gop.236998/post-6608895

All of them, leftist women included, are assumed to be biological females.

Mearle responded with his comment on the women pictured in FlatLame's post

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...ing-voters-fleeing-to-gop.236998/post-6608904

A few more moronic "our women are hot while theirs are ugly" comments not worth quoting were tossed in, but none of them implied biological differences.

It was at that point, Mearle posted a link to a pic of Karoline Leavitt and suggested that she is what a "real woman" looks like.

Nobody had as of that point, suggested that the pictures of the SUPPOSEDLY leftist women were of biological males or trans women.

I simply pointed out that Leavitt is not actually a "real" woman, but rather a fake, cosmetically altered version of a former real woman.
Look at this wall of text defending your own posts about how much this matters. That's how much it matters to you. You REALLY WANT to convince me that it should matter. Because it matters you are willing to spend energy on this. Even to the point where you are ready to define a "real woman" as someone without any surgery... This has to be the weakest argument I have ever heard from you, and that really says a lot...
 
Look at this wall of text defending your own posts about how much this matters. That's how much it matters to you. You REALLY WANT to convince me that it should matter.

No, I'm just passing the time on a Sunday afternoon.

The fact that you refuse to drop the subject strongly suggests that YOU are the one to whom it matters.
 
No, I'm just passing the time on a Sunday afternoon.

The fact that you refuse to drop the subject strongly suggests that YOU are the one to whom it matters.
lol. The rubber/glue argument of a four year old. Tell me again how much it doesn't matter to you, while you give me another wall of text telling me how much it matters.
 
lol. The rubber/glue argument of a four year old. Tell me again how much it doesn't matter to you, while you give me another wall of text telling me how much it matters.
It doesn't matter to me one iota.

Why does it matter to you so badly that you can't stop humping my leg about it?

DogHumpGifFoot.gif

It's getting a bit tiresome, Sparky.
 
It doesn't matter to me one iota.

Why does it matter to you so badly that you can't stop humping my leg about it?

View attachment 57107

It's getting a bit tiresome, Sparky.
Nice video of your dog, bro... Tell me more about it. Folks do not spend time posting photos of the "conspiracy" they want others to believe in... but they do insist on explaining the conspiracy theory to everyone that tells them they are foolish for caring.
 
Back
Top