Have you figured out why you're not allowed out in public? You frighten and disgust - well - everyone!
Damo: A Coward, A Fool, A Wimp, A Pragmatist, A Fierce Defender of Free Speech, Or Something Else? A Sincere Question.
- Thread starter Tobytone
- Start date
First of all. Fewer words. You don't need to be verbose to sound smart. The fact is - Democrats are NOT inciting violence. We're calling for unity. It's you sorry fucks who are all screaming "lock and load" because a white Christian nationalist was murdered. It was tragic, but no Democrat wanted it - I promise you I didn't.
So fucking get a clue and quit being such a dick.
Tobytone
Verified User
Ok, so your legally protected, keep thinking that. I've seen many cases in which the plaintiff signed a policy and that signature or in your case, someone checking a box, didn't save the ass of the defendant one bit. (I'm not the only one that didn't read a word of it) That said, I don't give a shit about being legally liable and a man doesn't make decisions based solely on legal liabilities. (I can hardly wait for the 'sexist' complaints from the woke brain trust, fuck off in advance)
From what I've heard, that may be true until the doxy scumbags are Fowl and friends, then it gets ignored, but again, I couldn't care less.
What Hume said isn’t “discourse” at all and shutting it down isn't ignoring it, it's doing the opposite, what a responsible freedom loving citizen of America would do if they had any moral compass at all. Why? Because it sends a message that calling or wishing for more political assassinations won't be tolerated here. The time for people to step up instead of hiding behind some bullshit concept that it's discourse, is now more than ever before.
You acted like you were respecting Charlie somehow by not responding to a thread titled “Who Else is Sick Up-To-Here With the Nonstop Cowardly Leftist Savagery??” like that’s some moral high ground, Charlie's name nowhere to be found. Hilarious pretense of a moral compass, Budda would be proud, I'm sure. Of course, that suggests you think you have morals, at least I think it does. If so, you have a responsibility to draw the line, not for legal liability, but because you don’t want a site you started or bought to be a platform for more calls for political violence. Explain how that’s not true.
One possible answer is, “I don’t give a shit about moral responsibility.” Another might be, “I believe it’s important to allow calls for political assassinations to preserve the First Amendment.” Of course, you didn’t say that because you might feel obligated to explain, and I’d love to hear that one.
I asked you several questions that you dodged. Either you had no answers, or you were too lazy to bother. If you thought they weren’t valid, are you so lazy you couldn’t explain why? You didn’t address any of my third paragraph’s questions at all. Maybe you did, and “I can’t get sued” is the depth of your thought process, in which case I’m not sure if you’re more of a coward, a wimp, or both, definitely not a fierce defender of the First Amendment, just a lame-ass dude who owns a website for a paycheck, reading a few Buddha quotes to pretend he’s deep, not an active citizen who believes he owes his fortune big or small to the fundamental truths that paved the way for him to live in the freest country the world has ever known. Being a good citizen requires a lot, but it includes doing the “hard work” of hitting the fuck-you-and-goodbye button when someone uses your forum to essentially call for the end of civil society. Explain how that’s not true.
Hume crossed a line that responsible, sane people need to set, it’s that simple.
I know many consider a few paragraphs to be hard work, but maybe pick at least two questions to answer, other than I can't get sued.
Tobytone
Verified User
I just made my case again in my response to Damo, and I stand by it.
Tobytone
Verified User
Fuck off, you're delusional if you can't see the democrats are inciting violence. You lost all credibility. If you want to call Charlie Kirk a 'White Christian Nationalist' you should define it, if you can. I've only begun being a dick.
Tobytone
Verified User
What a brilliant comment from a dumbass. No, I haven't noticed. Have I told you to fuck off lately?? Fuck off.
Tobytone
Verified User
What a liar, you went on to post several more dumbass comments. You fucking morons can even do what you say for 10 minutes, lol. I am debating Damo dumbass, that's what the site is all about. You morons just make useless comments that prove your mindless drones. I haven't seen a debate that involves libtards, ever. The only debate I've ever had here is with likeminded people.
So, when you say, 'that will be all' try it for least a few fucking minutes. Opps, I just hit the 10 minute mark for morons. That means I typed so many words you'll struggle for 10 minutes trying to get through it. All of you morons are adverse to anything longer than a meme size dumbass comment or ten pages of click-bait bullshit, no middle ground for you idiots. FUCK OFF
You see - this is why I know you're so ignorant. He was a self-admitted, white supremacist.
Also, you are such a lying pussy. Every time I've asked one of you cowardly fucks to name ONE DEMOCRAT "cheering Kirk's death" you run away like little bitches. But you're not the only cowardly, lying fuck, you're in bad company with @TOP @Stone @Teflon Don @volsrock and the rest of the pussy posse.
Maybe you'll surpise me and be the first, but I doubt it.
I'm sorry, I couldn't hear you over the sound of your yeast-filled, queefing vagina.
Tobytone
Verified User
WTF are you talking about, try to make sense. Show me the video that Charlie Kirk says he's a white supremacist you fucking drone. You won't, because you can't, because he didn't. Don't give me some cut of him quoting someone else like the NYT had to apologize for already. Is that your source you fucking idiot. Why you don't you know you're being lied to? It's because you have no idea what Charlie Kirk actually said, that requires effort, you have to listen. You take the word from some click-bait producing scumbag and think your informed. Truth is, you just another like every other fucking retarded drone. Fuck Off.
Tobytone
Verified User
Good one, lol. Is that really the best you can do. Pathetic, you're not only a drone, but a talentless fucking idiot to boot.
I'll give it to you, but you first: name ONE DEMOCRAT cheeping Kirk's murder, you poor sorry propagandist. C'mon - you asked me for proof - give it up. Name ONE PROMINENT DEMOCRAT "cheering Kirk's death". This is like the 100th time I've asked one of you sorry trumptard fucks. Either you're too stupid to remember your lies, or you're choking on trump's diseased tiny dick.
Holy shit! How'd YOU get outside? WARDEN! HE'S RIGHT HERE! Ok, tiger, back your padded cell now, everything's going to be ok, we're having jello tonight!
Tobytone
Verified User
Are you kidding? "You'll give it to me"? How about: I'm sorry, I was dead wrong. I've been spewing bullshit daily, making shit up like the mindless drone I am. I regurgitate vile garbage fed to me like treats to a dog in training. I should step out of my echo chamber and spend two minutes learning how dumb I've been since I could wipe my own ass. Start there, you fucking retard.
Have I said prominent Democrats cheered Charlie's murder? Stop putting words in my mouth just because you're an intellectually lazy POS, radicalized under the guise of "higher education" without ever realizing it. Many prominent Democrats have screamed, and will keep screaming, "Nazi! Nazi! Nazi! Fascist! Fascist! Fascist!" Do you deny that? If you're done being a fucking moron, you'll admit I'm right. You've probably parroted the same (not sure, since you drones all blend together, but I'll bet you've never said, "Fellow libtards, cool it, that's not accurate or funny; it's dangerous rhetoric"). So, explain what those words actually mean, and provide real evidence that Charlie or Trump is either one, for starters.
Let me try to help you not make a fucking fool of yourself. Let's look at a definition of Marxist for a little lesson that most 3rd graders understand.
A **Marxist** is a person who advocates or follows the theories of Karl Marx, emphasizing class struggle, collective ownership of production, and the overthrow of capitalism to establish a classless, socialist society.
Fair enough? I assume it is, if not you go get whatever definition you want. So, if someone emphasizes class struggles, are they a Marxist? I'll help again, NO. You can't cherry pick an element of a definition and claim that satisfies the standard of defining someone. Does that make sense, or should I elaborate and spell it out so a 1st grader gets it? So, you or any other dumbass that managed to make it through this 20-minute read, don't bother with your usual examples that you've used many times thinking you sound intelligent while actually exposing your ignorance.
Opps, way too long for all you simpletons. I'll stop here.
Tobytone
Verified User
Dude, I'm starting to think you're in love. I'm not interested in the slightest, besides are you always late to a circle jerk? Your pivot man told me that nobody likes being the last one there, they get shafted ever time. OUCH! Better hurry.
There are many here that need that padded cell, I'm not one of them, you.....jury's out.
Leech lies without remorse - another pathological liar from team evil.
Tobytone
Verified User
Agreed, but out of all the brain-dead scumbags here, I somehow think there might be a speck of hope for Lurch. Don't ask me what, I can put my finger on it. Don't get me wrong, I highly doubt we'll ever be treated to a reversal by him or any other libtard here, but he might actually pick up a book outside of the echo chamber someday and realize what a fool he's been. Listen to me, lol. I haven't slept much lately.
Well, there is this scumbag that goes by @LurchAddams who was. This foul pig actually had the nerve to lie that Charlie Kirk of all people was a "white supremacist."
@LurchAddams
You've been answered every time. You just ignore and lie.