Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University


Eric Daugherty

@EricLDaugh



BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard just delivered a powerful message at the Charlie Kirk vigil."She said, 'what do we do now? I know the answer should be love. The answer should be peace. But Charlie tried that, and it didn't work.' And my response to her was, 'no, it DID work. POWERFULLY. And that's why they killed him.""We look at the movement that Charlie inspired around the world, love, truth, freedom, turning to God in good times and hard times, not asking God what he will do for us. But as Charlie said, quote, 'I am far more interested in what God wants from me than what I want from God.'"
 
No, there isn't.

There's no military weapon called "assault rifle". It doesn't exist.

There's no military weapon called "assault rifle". It doesn't exist.

No civilian CAN ever own one; IT DOESN'T EXIST.

It was coined "assault weapon" (a fully automatic rifle) by the Germans, I believe. So yes they do exist.
But you are partially correct, no one can own one unless they go through many government hoops and expense.
 
Liberals are for Capitalism. They advocate individual freedom and equality for all.

Fighting for freedom and the rights of Black people is the liberal way. Conservatism seeks to conserve the status quo.

Agreed.

Liberals are for capitalism? You obviously don't know the difference between Conservative Capitalism and Democrat Socialism.
 
It was coined "assault weapon" (a fully automatic rifle) by the Germans, I believe. So yes they do exist.
Fully automatic rifles exist.
"Assault weapons" don't exist, as weapons don't assault.
But you are partially correct, no one can own one unless they go through many government hoops and expense.
You're correct that fully automatic rifles can be owned by civilians.
"Assault weapons" can't be owned by anyone because no such thing exists. Weapons don't assault; they are inanimate objects.
 
Fully automatic rifles exist.
"Assault weapons" don't exist, as weapons don't assault.

You're correct that fully automatic rifles can be owned by civilians.
"Assault weapons" can't be owned by anyone because no such thing exists. Weapons don't assault; they are inanimate objects.
Look it up, a German fully automatic rifle was dubbed an "assault rifle" by Hitler, I think.
Don't be a dick, everyone (with a hint of common sense) knows weapons don't assault on their own :rolleyes:
 
Fully automatic rifles exist.
"Assault weapons" don't exist, as weapons don't assault.

You're correct that fully automatic rifles can be owned by civilians.
"Assault weapons" can't be owned by anyone because no such thing exists. Weapons don't assault; they are inanimate objects.
An assault weapon is anything deigned for urban warfare.
 
Generally, a fully automatic rifle.
I could assault a lot of ducks with one of these.

mw3-riveter.jpg
 
I could assault a lot of ducks with one of these.

mw3-riveter.jpg
Is that a 12 or 20 gauge?

But yeah, you could piss in the acorns of a whole flock of ducks with that thing (I see it's select fire, too!). I'd be curious of the barrel length and the effective range. Ducks are hard to bring down, even with a "standard barrel length" full choke shotgun.
Duck and geese hunting was one of my father's favorite hobbies. I hunted lots of ducks in my younger days. I know how hard they are to bring down.
 
Is that a 12 or 20 gauge?

But yeah, you could piss in the acorns of a whole flock of ducks with that thing (I see it's select fire, too!). I'd be curious of the barrel length and the effective range. Ducks are hard to bring down, even with a "standard barrel length" full choke shotgun.
Duck and geese hunting was one of my father's favorite hobbies. I hunted lots of ducks in my younger days. I know how hard they are to bring down.
Looks like a 20 gauge. Great for home defense. Here's something like it.

1757949098818.png
 
Look it up, a German fully automatic rifle was dubbed an "assault rifle" by Hitler, I think.
That terminology made for good war propaganda at the time (and for good "gun grabbing" propaganda nowadays). It's just a buzzword; nothing more. The actual (meaningful) term [that describes what actually exists] is 'fully automatic rifle'.
Don't be a dick, everyone (with a hint of common sense) knows weapons don't assault on their own :rolleyes:
I would think that it would be common knowledge, which is why the usage of the term "assault rifle" is meaningless beyond propaganda purposes (and is thus nothing more than a leftist buzzword).
 
Back
Top