OK Muslim so what?You said Arab, not Muslim, and it still isn’t dominance. Not all Muslims are Arabs.
OK Muslim so what?You said Arab, not Muslim, and it still isn’t dominance. Not all Muslims are Arabs.
That and the one nation they all hate has only like 3 voices in its favor... they are lucky that one of them has veto power.57 Muslim-majority countries and 2 billion Muslims.
The Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), a bloc of 57 member states, coordinates the positions of its members at the UN. This bloc can have significant influence on UN decision-making through its collective voting power and diplomatic efforts in various committees, rather than controlling any one committee outright. An example of this is the OIC's successful push to establish an International Day to Combat Islamophobia.
And the vast majority of arabs are MuslimsYou said Arab, not Muslim, and it still isn’t dominance. Not all Muslims are Arabs.
Because criticizing Charlie Kirk isn't the same as treason, sedition or plotting to overthrow government.No. Why would you say that?
It’s a big difference, as I stated, not all Muslims are Arabs. 85% of Muslims aren’t ArabOK Muslim so what?
When it comes to trump, here's you.Spin harder. Why not just admit you lied? I haven't ever seen Trump advocate for violence. I have seen him try to prevent violence though.
![]()
Sending them home for giving an opinion about a political activist?So sending them HOME is a prosecution. Interesting.![]()
57 against one is pretty bad odds. But lets get back to your odd genocide claim. Do you think sending food fuel and medical supplies is a bad way to commit genocide. Why would Israel allow Palestinians to serve in its military and Knesset. If they were trying to systematically kill them. Why would they encourage Palestinians to move from areas before attacks on Hamas.You said Arab, not Muslim, and it still isn’t dominance. Not all Muslims are Arabs.
No for cheering the murder of an American citizen. No different than telling a kid to go home if he behaves badly in your home.Sending them home for giving an opinion about a political activist?
Sending them home for giving an opinion about a political activist?
I guess you missed the case cited.I'm just talking about legality, not what folks might think. I think deportation is punitive, but it is not, according to the law, for instance. Revoking a VISA is not punitive by the law, and the Executive has the authority to do it in certain circumstances without judicial action
Then I guess the people who cheered when RBG died should be sent away, right?No for cheering the murder of an American citizen.
True but a lot of reports are made without that veto power being involved.That and the one nation they all hate has only like 3 voices in its favor... they are lucky that one of them has veto power.
Was RBG murdered. Most , not all the people on the right were respectful when she died. Do you have a link to a visa holder that wasn't?Then I guess the people who cheered when RBG died should be sent away, right?
No, it is why I said "in many cases". It is not prosecution to deport someone, or to revoke a VISA.I guess you missed the case cited.
Yes, he's right.Is Rubio right should we reject people that support political violence.
Always a qualification with magas.Was RBG murdered. Most , not all the people on the right were respectful when she died. Do you have a link to a visa holder that wasn't?
And if RBG was gunned down in the streets and IF a VISA holder cheered it I would say revoking their visa and sending them home would be the right thing to do.@FastLane
Right-Wing Extremists Compare RBG to Hitler, Celebrate Death of ‘Mass Murdering Hag’
![]()
Right-Wing Extremists Celebrate Death of 'Mass Murdering ...
Some internet preachers have described Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death as an opportunity to shift the balance on the Supreme Court, potentially putting the landm...www.newsweek.com
WellAlways a qualification with magas.![]()