Socialism And Righting A Wrong.

Highlight

Verified User
If given the opportunity, you should all vote Democratic Socialist in the 2026 mid term elections. Or at the very least, Democrat. As for the wrong that needs to be righted, that starts out with the tax breaks Reagan gave to the wealthy. Right now, the bottom 50% of Americans have around 4 trillion in wealth. The top 50% of Americans have around 156 trillion in wealth. Though I couldn't say so for sure, I doubt in the days of Rome when they had slaves or during the middle ages in Europe when they had serfs that there was any different of a wealth disparity than what we have. But what we do have is bad enough. And I have the solutions. Socialism. (Or at least Democratic Socialism) Though that is far from meaning that capitalism would go away. It would just be more fair. Such as when under FDR, Truman and Eisenhower the tax rate for the wealthy was at 90%.

From there, the U.S. is around 37 trillion in debt. From the top 50%, the U.S. should seize 56 trillion in wealth. The more they have, the more we take. With that, pay off our 37 trillion debt. That would leave 19 trillion left over. What could we do with that? Well to start out, we should put a price freeze in place like Nixon did. Then pay people back for what they have been ripped off for ever since Reagan's tax breaks for the wealthy. Because obviously, "trickle down" didn't work. I say after the price freeze, we should give every working adult or retiree $50,000 dollars. That would cost around 7 trillion dollars.

That would leave 12 trillion left over. What could we do with that? To start out, fix all the infrastructure in the U.S. That would cost around a trillion. Next, for just about everything Americans buy, such as cars, refrigerators, washing machines, TV's, cell phones, etc, the U.S. should build government owned factories to build those things. That would take around another trillion dollars. When the private companies who make those things for profit go out of business, the U.S. can just take those companies over and have them government run companies.

So, what to do with the other 10 trillion or so? How about housing every American and giving all of them a car of their choice. (Electric of course) That might cost around another trillion. But likely, much less. So, what to do with the other 9 trillion? Well according to Yale University, it would cost the U.S. around 4.5 trillion to convert completely to renewable energy.


🌐

Yale e360
e360.yale.edu › digest › shifting-u-s-to-100-percent-renewables-would-cost-4-5-trillion-analysis-finds




Shifting U.S. to 100 Percent Renewables Would Cost $4.5 Trillion, Analysis Finds - Yale E360


So, that would leave the us with about another 4.5 trillion. I'm sure somebody could think of other things to use that money for. On top of all that, raise the federal minimum wage to at least $40.00 per hour. So, naysayers, (Which seems to be all there is around here) have at it.
 
If given the opportunity, you should all vote Democratic Socialist in the 2026 mid term elections.
At every opportunity, stamp out all socialism.

Or at the very least, Democrat.
Let the Democrat party relegate itself to the septic tank of history.

As for the wrong that needs to be righted, that starts out with the tax breaks Reagan gave to the wealthy.
You didn't define "wealthy." Reagan gave tax breaks to everyone who pays taxes, as did Trump. What do you have against tax breaks?

Right now, the bottom 50% of Americans have around 4 trillion in wealth.
Are you going to pretend that wealth differences are somehow bad? You are, aren't you?

All Marxists are economics-challenged and are undereducated in all other disciplines. The greater the economy, the greater the wealth and income differences; only where everyone is broke and miserable, wealth equality reigns.

But what we do have is bad enough.
What we have is great! Why do you want everyone to be broke and miserable? Oh wait, you just want all the wealth redistributed, from those who earned it to those who did not. You want the government to confiscate the wealth of those who have added value to society and who have brought happiness to people's lives, and to redistribute that wealth to you for free, right?

I see where you're going with this. Go on ...

And I have the solutions. Socialism. (Or at least Democratic Socialism) Though that is far from meaning that capitalism would go away. It would just be more fair. Such as when under FDR, Truman and Eisenhower the tax rate for the wealthy was at 90%.
I'll tell you what, I'll totally endorse your plan if I get to be the guy who centrally plans everything and who determines how all the wealth is redistributed. Do we have a deal?

From there, the U.S. is around 37 trillion in debt. From the top 50%, the U.S. should seize 56 trillion in wealth.
So you want to kill the goose that lays the golden eggs? Why? Why do you want everyone to be broke and miserable?

The more they have, the more we take.
Aaaaaahhh! The Marxist "they" and "we"! @gfm7175, I hope you are tracking this.

"They" = "Everyone other than me"
"We" = "I"

Is that about right? The more wealth held by people other than you, should be seized by you, right? And you want me, as the central planner and wealth redistributor, to make this happen, right?

With that, pay off our 37 trillion debt.
Nope. You and I are going to take it all, and spend our days drinking guava daquiris in the Bahamas! Woo-hoo! Cook Islands Trust here we come!

That would leave 19 trillion left over.
Why put ashes back into the barbeque pit? Let's take that as well.

What could we do with that?
I think we already know what we can do with all that.

Well to start out, we should put a price freeze in place like Nixon did.
That's great, we'll have the government artificially fuck with supply-demand price realization, accelerating the demise of the economy and rushing the entire country to abject poverty and dire misery. And the best part of it all is that we don't need to spend any of our war booty and spoils to make that happen. Not one thin dime.

Then pay people back for what they have been ripped off for ever since Reagan's tax breaks for the wealthy.
Yeah, we can skip that part. Nobody was really ripped off, but you and I are owed all the money we'll be taking so that really is the best use of those funds.

Because obviously, "trickle down" didn't work.
Of course not. It had to be something else that made the US the most powerful economy in the world. Obviously it wasn't the supply-demand curve. I really wonder what it could have been.

I say after the price freeze, we should give every working adult or retiree $50,000 dollars.
No. That will seriously cut into our daquiri diet.

So, your novel idea is to steal wealth from those who earned it, so that you can give away lots of free stuff. Hmmmmm. That's refreshingly new. I wonder why Democrats haven't picked up on the idea.
 
Possibly. I'll need a graphic.
90
 
If given the opportunity, you should all vote Democratic Socialist in the 2026 mid term elections. Or at the very least, Democrat. As for the wrong that needs to be righted, that starts out with the tax breaks Reagan gave to the wealthy. Right now, the bottom 50% of Americans have around 4 trillion in wealth. The top 50% of Americans have around 156 trillion in wealth. Though I couldn't say so for sure, I doubt in the days of Rome when they had slaves or during the middle ages in Europe when they had serfs that there was any different of a wealth disparity than what we have. But what we do have is bad enough. And I have the solutions. Socialism. (Or at least Democratic Socialism) Though that is far from meaning that capitalism would go away. It would just be more fair. Such as when under FDR, Truman and Eisenhower the tax rate for the wealthy was at 90%.

From there, the U.S. is around 37 trillion in debt. From the top 50%, the U.S. should seize 56 trillion in wealth. The more they have, the more we take. With that, pay off our 37 trillion debt. That would leave 19 trillion left over. What could we do with that? Well to start out, we should put a price freeze in place like Nixon did. Then pay people back for what they have been ripped off for ever since Reagan's tax breaks for the wealthy. Because obviously, "trickle down" didn't work. I say after the price freeze, we should give every working adult or retiree $50,000 dollars. That would cost around 7 trillion dollars.

That would leave 12 trillion left over. What could we do with that? To start out, fix all the infrastructure in the U.S. That would cost around a trillion. Next, for just about everything Americans buy, such as cars, refrigerators, washing machines, TV's, cell phones, etc, the U.S. should build government owned factories to build those things. That would take around another trillion dollars. When the private companies who make those things for profit go out of business, the U.S. can just take those companies over and have them government run companies.

So, what to do with the other 10 trillion or so? How about housing every American and giving all of them a car of their choice. (Electric of course) That might cost around another trillion. But likely, much less. So, what to do with the other 9 trillion? Well according to Yale University, it would cost the U.S. around 4.5 trillion to convert completely to renewable energy.


🌐
Yale e360
e360.yale.edu › digest › shifting-u-s-to-100-percent-renewables-would-cost-4-5-trillion-analysis-finds

Shifting U.S. to 100 Percent Renewables Would Cost $4.5 Trillion, Analysis Finds - Yale E360

So, that would leave the us with about another 4.5 trillion. I'm sure somebody could think of other things to use that money for. On top of all that, raise the federal minimum wage to at least $40.00 per hour. So, naysayers, (Which seems to be all there is around here) have at it.
Could you give us a rough breakdown of how that "56 trillion in wealth" is distributed? That is, list what it is, like cash, stocks, real estate, personal property, etc.
 
After several adult beverages and careful consideration, in that order, I have great concern with your offer. For starters, your ribbon is not much for style. No offense, but it is mediocre at best. For me and my greedy life, mediocrity is not an option. I strive for perfection and thettle for excellence.

As stated earlier, my trade is building solar powered toasters. I am damn good at it. However, the toasters don't really work so well. I just build them really good. I could step up my game and get these things to kick out maby four pieces of toast per hour, but that will take a lot of investment money that I will need to borrow. Let's be honest, Biden ain't around anymore to forgive that loan! Tell me IBdaMann, why should I risk financial heartbreak and ruin for a mediocre ribbon? Also, I've heard your stump speech. It sounds good, but what assurance can you give me that you will actually follow through and give me what I am entitled to?

On a side note, I have a breakthrough idea to solve the EV charging station issue. My idea is a mobile charging station. This would be an add on rooftop mounted wind turbine which would produce free electricity as you power your vehicle down the road. This virtually eliminates the short range issues of EVs! I would sell them at a fair prices according to your income. So IBdaMann, how many ribbons can I get for putting that into perpetual motion?
 
Last edited:
... I have great concern with your offer.
Wait, if you act now, you will receive a second Sham-Wow absolutely free!

For starters, your ribbon is not much for style.
... but they feeeeeeel soooooo gooooooood! Where else are you going to get a "Most Stylish" ribbon? That's right, nowhere!

I strive for perfection and thettle for excellence.
You might thtrive for perfecthun, and thettle for only exthellenth, but the world will never know that you are the most Thtylith!

As stated earlier, my trade is building solar powered toasters. I am damn good at it. However, the toasters don't really work so well.
I bet they work like champs outdoors in the Mojave desert. Have you tried using them there?

Tell me IBdaMann, why should I risk financial heartbreak and ruin for a mediocre ribbon?
Because it would be the most stylish thing to do, bar none.

Also, I've heard your stump speech.
360_F_246304249_1ZnktBL5o1yqMBKrFAgLOfqxSVyM6NIy.jpg

Since then, I have incorporated large fallen branches.

Lucky-Escape-by-Smabs-Sputzer-on-Flickr.com_.jpg


It sounds good, but what assurance can you give me that you will actually follow through and give me what I am entitled to?
It's just that I don't agree with the quantity of firewood you claim you are owed. I asked Frank and he says that you are exaggerating again, like you do when you talk smack about "Most Stylish" ribbons.

On a side note, I have a breakthrough idea to solve the EV charging station issue. My idea is a mobile charging station.
I know. You told Ralph about the PowerGuzzler prototype, and Ralph told Frank, and Frank told Sven, and Sven sent me a pic of the proof of concept via text message.


0ec5882b10f0395936dc396ebb7b555b.jpg


This would be an add on rooftop mounted wind turbine which would produce free electricity as you power your vehicle down the road.
I think you owe a HUGE debt of gratitude to the Global Warming congregations, the Climate Change worshipers, the warmizombies and climate lemmings of the world, for explaining to the world that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics can be circumvented. Who knew?

2826aab54154c483fe1db09b599e5c94.jpg


This virtually eliminates the short range issues of EVs!
... and it softens hands while you do the dishes.

I would sell them at a fair prices according to your income. So IBdaMann, how many ribbons can I get for putting that into perpetual motion?
Only one.
 
@Twilight, are you still with us here?

Even with all the bullshit, IBdaMann has crystal clearly spelled out why socialism is a death wish.

You continually speak of a "fair" system where everyone has equal income regardless of what they produce.

If I were able to create a free energy system the entire planet would be at my door demanding to buy it, yet in your world my compensation would be the same as the cashier at your local convenience store. Why would I do it? Why would anyone do it?

Like it or not, people are motivated by money. Capitalism unlocks innovation. Without it, the device you use to post your drivel would not exist. Any questions?
 
Wait, if you act now, you will receive a second Sham-Wow absolutely free!


... but they feeeeeeel soooooo gooooooood! Where else are you going to get a "Most Stylish" ribbon? That's right, nowhere!


You might thtrive for perfecthun, and thettle for only exthellenth, but the world will never know that you are the most Thtylith!


I bet they work like champs outdoors in the Mojave desert. Have you tried using them there?


Because it would be the most stylish thing to do, bar none.


360_F_246304249_1ZnktBL5o1yqMBKrFAgLOfqxSVyM6NIy.jpg

Since then, I have incorporated large fallen branches.

Lucky-Escape-by-Smabs-Sputzer-on-Flickr.com_.jpg



It's just that I don't agree with the quantity of firewood you claim you are owed. I asked Frank and he says that you are exaggerating again, like you do when you talk smack about "Most Stylish" ribbons.


I know. You told Ralph about the PowerGuzzler prototype, and Ralph told Frank, and Frank told Sven, and Sven sent me a pic of the proof of concept via text message.


0ec5882b10f0395936dc396ebb7b555b.jpg



I think you owe a HUGE debt of gratitude to the Global Warming congregations, the Climate Change worshipers, the warmizombies and climate lemmings of the world, for explaining to the world that the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics can be circumvented. Who knew?

2826aab54154c483fe1db09b599e5c94.jpg



... and it softens hands while you do the dishes.


Only one.
Perfect!
 
Back
Top