Ballroom Derangement Syndrome Now Besets the Pathetic Left

christiefan915 said:
There are a lot of questions that can't be answered yet. What will be the cost of furnishings and upkeep of the ballroom? How often will the ballroom actually be used? How do we really know that building costs will all be paid through donors?

I don't like it because I think it's an ugly addition that will take away from the WH. It'd going to dwarf the main building. The WH used to be 55,000 sq. feet; now the East Wing is gone and the ballroom is going to be 90,000 sq. feet. It's not proportionate.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't think there's any answers since it isn't built yet. Only time will tell.

How can you say it's ugly or not proportionate when nothing has been built yet?
 
RB 60 said:
I wouldn't think there's any answers since it isn't built yet. Only time will tell.

How can you say it's ugly or not proportionate when nothing has been built yet?
Click to expand...
Yeah; now, THIS IS UGLY:

Obama_library_spring_2025.png
 
Grokmaster said:
A privately funded GIFT to the American People, which will allow us to treat Presidential guests with common dignity, instead of outside, in the weather forced to use Port-a Pots, etc....

This, of course, has driven the perpetual-burr-up-the-ass left into a foamy-mouthed frenzy...."Ballroom Derangement Syndrome".
Click to expand...

A whopping twenty-five (25%) percent of the American public likes what Trump is doing to the White House. These are the citizens who like everything Trump does because it is Trump doing it. Poor bastards.

 
martin said:
A whopping twenty-five (25%) percent of the American public likes what Trump is doing to the White House. These are the citizens who like everything Trump does because it is Trump doing it. Poor bastards.

Click to expand...
Says a fake news poll of the uninformed idiots; the 28% who still listen to the fake news.

The same Yahoo bullshit poll cited by you and the other dupes on every thread....like anyone is buying that bullshit. :rolleyes:
 
RB 60 said:
I wouldn't think there's any answers since it isn't built yet. Only time will tell.

How can you say it's ugly or not proportionate when nothing has been built yet?
Click to expand...
We have seen the pictures of the monstrosity.
The ballroom plans call for a 90,000 sq ft. structure, while the White House is 55,000 sq ft. The ballroom is nearly twice the size of the White House.

DonOld’s style of fake gold crap adorning his structures, guarantees it will be tacky.
 
Phantasmal said:
We have seen the pictures of the monstrosity.
The ballroom plans call for a 90,000 sq ft. structure, while the White House is 55,000 sq ft. The ballroom is nearly twice the size of the White House.

DonOld’s style of fake gold crap adorning his structures, guarantees it will be tacky.
Click to expand...

Pictures? How can you take a picture of something that's not there?

So, now that there's no pictures, you are saying it will be tacky?

I think you need a nap.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top