Ballroom Derangement Syndrome Now Besets the Pathetic Left

[TOP]

Looks great...and no White House guests in the wet grass/mud, using Port-o-Potties....

Very very true... No More serving poached lobster a hundred feet away from a portable toilet...

 

[RB 60]

There are a lot of questions that can't be answered yet. What will be the cost of furnishings and upkeep of the ballroom? How often will the ballroom actually be used? How do we really know that building costs will all be paid through donors?

I don't like it because I think it's an ugly addition that will take away from the WH. It'd going to dwarf the main building. The WH used to be 55,000 sq. feet; now the East Wing is gone and the ballroom is going to be 90,000 sq. feet. It's not proportionate.

I wouldn't think there's any answers since it isn't built yet. Only time will tell.

How can you say it's ugly or not proportionate when nothing has been built yet?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Says the crazy conspiracy theorist.

And what conspiracy theory do you allege I am following?

That the ballroom is cover for a secret bunker where Trump plots against you?

ROFL

 

[Uncensored2008]

Looks great...and no White House guests in the wet grass/mud, using Port-o-Potties....

Yeah, BUH TWUUUUUMMMPPPP.

You've got to figure the average leftist is about like a severely retarded two year old.

 

[christiefan915]

I wouldn't think there's any answers since it isn't built yet. Only time will tell.

How can you say it's ugly or not proportionate when nothing has been built yet?

I'm going by the drawings that are online. But if the addition is almost twice the size of the original structure, I call it disproportionate.

 

[Grokmaster]

I wouldn't think there's any answers since it isn't built yet. Only time will tell.

How can you say it's ugly or not proportionate when nothing has been built yet?

Yeah; now, THIS IS UGLY: