Reality: Homosexual Marriage

USFREEDOM911 said:
Only the data compiled by those that have an agenda to denigrate homosexuals.

Unless you're saying that Priests are homosexuals; but then, that would be wrong also, because they're just pedophiles.
Click to expand...

SM chooses to ignore the studies and research that show that pedophiles are not attracted to adults of their same gender. He even chooses to ignore that pedophiles often have no preference as far as gender of their victims.

Not particularly surprising.

But this has nothing to do with this topic. As far as the gay marriage topic, the study on pedophiles is irrelevant.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Only the data compiled by those that have an agenda to denigrate homosexuals.

Unless you're saying that Priests are homosexuals; but then, that would be wrong also, because they're just pedophiles.
Click to expand...
Only the data compiled by those with the courage to tell the truth.
 
AnyOldIron said:
You forgot the 1812 burning down the White House....

Firstly, as I can see you are a bit hard of thinking. BP was half owned by Americans, half the board are Americans, the parts that went wrong were from Halliburton.

Secondly, considering the US history of pollution and industrial accidents (Bhopal for eg.) you have nothing to say.

Thirdly, are you Dixie in drag?
Click to expand...
Yeah, those awesome Canadians went and burned down a house, before they were sent back to the cold, cold north...

And when did this become about BP? Did I miss something? Are you telling me you too have some sort of weird nationalism associated with a Corporation? That's something you should really seek psychological counseling for. No matter how many times you try to blame the US for something some multi-national corp does somewhere, like in Bhopal, we will continue pointing out that no Corporation in any way promotes American interests, they promote their own. It is an extreme foolishness to associate a nation to a corporation, and even more so to associate some national pride in a corporation.
 
Southern Man said:
Damo, are you against incestuous marriage?
Click to expand...
I am against any marriage that a church would not provide. I am against the government attempting to define such a thing and think the churches should do it. I am pro-church and anti religious government.
 
Damocles said:
I am against any marriage that a church would not provide. I am against the government attempting to define such a thing and think the churches should do it. I am pro-church and anti-religious government.
Click to expand...
The government has laws that prohibit not only incestuous marriage, but any incestuous relations. Isn't the basis for these laws religious?
 
Southern Man said:
The government has laws that prohibit not only incestuous marriage, but any incestuous relations. Isn't the basis for these laws religious?
Click to expand...
The basis of the law is to protect their progeny to which there is considerable physical danger. However, there is no need to define it into law that they cannot "marry", let the churches define that. Basically, the basis of the law is in science, not in your dogma, that it fits within your dogma doesn't really carry all that much weight. Tell me how speeding laws fit within your dogma... This law matches that of speeding laws, you do not get to put others in danger for your own purpose.
 
Southern Man said:
The government has laws that prohibit not only incestuous marriage, but any incestuous relations. Isn't the basis for these laws religious?
Click to expand...

The basis for these laws is to avoid inbreeding and the inherent problems associated with it.
 
Damocles said:
The basis of the law is to protect their progeny to which there is considerable physical danger. However, there is no need to define it into law that they cannot "marry", let the churches define that. Basically, the basis of the law is in science, not in your dogma, that it fits within your dogma doesn't really carry all that much weight. Tell me how speeding laws fit within your dogma... This law matches that of speeding laws, you do not get to put others in danger for your own purpose.
Click to expand...
Aside from offspring deformities what's the societal danger in incest? Lets say that the brother has a vasectomy so he won't get his sister pregnant. If queer marriage advocates want to be consistent then that should be legal.
 
Southern Man said:
Aside from offspring deformities what's the societal danger in incest? Lets say that the brother has a vasectomy so he won't get his sister pregnant. If queer marriage advocates want to be consistent then that should be legal.
Click to expand...
Aside for the reason for the law, what is the reason for the law? Really? That's the best that you can offer? (BTW - I know that at least one couple is married with exactly that "agreement" enforced. I think I saw it on Dr. Phil... Sick as it is, they had to agree to no progeny.)

You are being deliberately obtuse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top