SCOTUS protects marriage equality

[Into the Night]

The fad is now dying out. They've learned about divorce and 'community property' n stuff', so the rich ones are not marrying their live in prostitutes so much now.

But the destructive nature of this homosexual behavior remains.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The dred scott decision in 1857 ruled blacks could not be considered US citizens and thereby could not sur for their freedom. In essence black had no way to redress their grievance of slavery.

Before the 13th amendment they sure as shit were selected for discrimination

Dredd Scott did not rule that blacks couldn't be citizens. It ruled that slaves were property and could not be citizens.
Free blacks whose ancestors were not imported as slaves were not denied their citizenship by Dredd Scott.

 

[Into the Night]

And who decides whether it is a marriage or a civil union?

The English language. You should learn it someday.

 

[Into the Night]

Do you think every non religious person favors same sex "marriage"? Thats intellectually lazy.

Worse, It's bigotry and an omniscience fallacy. He is attempting to speak for everyone.

 

[Yakuda]

Dredd Scott did not rule that blacks couldn't be citizens. It ruled that slaves were property and could not be citizens.
Free blacks whose ancestors were not imported as slaves were not denied their citizenship by Dredd Scott.

I didn't say they couldn't be citizens. Try again skippy

 

[Into the Night]

Dredd Scott did not rule that blacks couldn't be citizens. It ruled that slaves were property and could not be citizens.
Free blacks whose ancestors were not imported as slaves were not denied their citizenship by Dredd Scott.

It's 2025, Poorboy.

 

[Into the Night]

A lot of MAGAts are rumored to be on the DL when it comes to homosexuality. Hence all the homophobia as cover coming from them.

Try English, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

You are locked in a paradox.

State the paradox.

 

[Into the Night]

Marriage is not reproduction. Or else barren women's marriages would not be vaild.

Irrelevance fallacy.

Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. There is no other English definition for it.

 

[ZenMode]

Do you think every non religious person favors same sex "marriage"? Thats intellectually lazy.

Nope. There is no "every" when it comes to opinion.

Do you really believe the marriage, and the current marriage issues, aren't tied to religion?

 

[Into the Night]

Christianity or the Bible IS NOT the government.

YARP. No one said it was, LeftNut.

 

[Yakuda]

Worse, It's bigotry and an omniscience fallacy. He is attempting to speak for everyone.

They do that a lot

 

[Into the Night]

Yes you did. Marriage is not about reproduction.

Yep. In principle barren couples cannot marry according to you.

He never said any such thing, LeftNut. Go learn English.

 

[Into the Night]

They were denied marriage if they didn't marry someone that the God of Abraham agreed with.

Never happened, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

No. You have no logic, only your made up definition that no one accepts.

Ability to reproduce is not a requirement in marriage.

Omniscience fallacy. Strawman fallacy. Denial of logic.

 

[Yakuda]

Nope. There is no "every" when it comes to opinion.

Do you really believe the marriage, and the current marriage issues, aren't tied to religion?

Where did I say that? I said this isn't about religion and that the govt has a compelling reason to encourage marriage between one man and one woman. Beyond that marriage has always been between opposite sex people even in cases where bigomy is allowed. Please do try to keep up

 

[Into the Night]

And this is why you are so stupid because you make stupid arguments.

The law never prevented people from marrying someone of their own race but it did prevent marrying outside your race in many states. According to your logic that would mean such a law is just fine and should still be allowed.

The Constitution is the supreme law and overrules all other laws which is why Loving is just as relevant is Obergefell. Both rulings use equal protection as the basis of their ruling.

Strawman fallacies. Go learn English. Marriage is a union of a man and a woman. It has no other meaning.

 

[Into the Night]

Nope. There is no "every" when it comes to opinion.

Do you really believe the marriage, and the current marriage issues, aren't tied to religion?

Strawman fallacy. Go learn English, Void.

 

[Into the Night]

They do that a lot

That they do! Another favorite bad habit is the inversion fallacy (projection), blaming their own problems on someone else.
They also speak a different language. It is not English. Words in that language have no meaning or shifting meaning. I call it Liberal.

 

[Into the Night]

One more time, tardboy.

1 U.S. Code § 7 - Marriage

“(a)For the purposes of any Federal law, rule, or regulation in which marital status is a factor, an individual shall be considered married if that individual’s marriage is between 2 individuals and is valid in the State where the marriage was entered into or, in the case of a marriage entered into outside any State, if the marriage is between 2 individuals and is valid in the place where entered into and the marriage could have been entered into in a State.”

Can you find a literate 10 year old to read that to you?

One more time, tardboy.

Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. It has no other meaning in English.