I forget how young you areI don’t know who that is.
I forget how young you areI don’t know who that is.
What specific order are you talking about you fucking idiot?Akin to Abu Ghraib and the Malay massacre.
Does anyone here disagree American troops should be required to follow illegal orders?
Disobeying an unlawful order is required by law!
The orders to torture, prisoners, and murder innocence. Are you not aware of those incidencesWhat specific order are you talking about you fucking idiot?
No I want you to document here specifically what orders were given to who. I don't trust your fucking hate filled lying mouthThe orders to torture, prisoners, and murder innocence. Are you not aware of those incidences
Sorry, I do not have the time, there are many accounts on the internet, its not so important to me that you be educated, illustrating your ignorance to you and others is enough for me.No I want you to document here specifically what orders were given to who. I don't trust your fucking hate filled lying mouth
That is the brutal cold blood murder of an entire town of men women and children.They charged Lt. Calley
So you're just shitting through that sewer you call a mouth again. Youre a fucking pinhead.Sorry, I do not have the time, there are many accounts on the internet, its not so important to me that you be educated, illustrating your ignorance to you and others is enough for me.
Keep crying, Trumpper.So you're just shitting through that sewer you call a mouth again. Youre a fucking pinhead.
You brought up a good point. Would it be wrong and unlawful to advise the troops of their duty to refuse the unlawful orders, especially during the 60's?the toxic shit stains are so far gone it is pathetic
so was it unlawful for the President to demand schools desegregated in the 60's?
you assholes are at it again. Just because you bigots can't tolerate that you lost power and don't like the federal laws, you lie and make up shit
putting out questionable ideology about what is and isn't unlawful should be. especially when it only endangers the troop individual who makes a bad choice because of what some partisan fuckstick sayd.Cry more, Trumpper.
Reminding the troops of their obligations is nowhere close to sedition.
have they? Because I can tell you that I NEVER received any training on what is or might be an unlawful orderThey have already been trained by far better people than these provocatiors.
Are they also telling these troops what is, and isn't, an illegal order??????Telling troops that they are required to refuse illegal orders is stirring up friction between officers and enlisted.
Incredibly stupid position.
Your false outrage is silly.
Cry more, Trumper!
the only rule books are the Constitution and the laws of the land...............that's not the problem, thoughI see the unfaithful pEarl has weighed in but haven't read his excuses yet. This should be interesting.
Let's say troops are deployed to an American city, because they are. What would constitute an unlawful order? Firing on protesters? Assaulting protesters? Arresting protesters? Looking the other way if police brutality is happening? Stopping police brutality? Is there a rule book for something for them to consult?
I do not know, I have been told its part of the training, if not it really SHOULD be.Are they also telling these troops what is, and isn't, an illegal order??????
Who did that?putting out questionable ideology about what is and isn't unlawful should be. especially when it only endangers the troop individual who makes a bad choice because of what some partisan fuckstick sayd.
An officer giving a blatantly illegal order is extremely rare. There's zero need to point out the implications of receiving one. Those six Democrats wasted their time, insulted members of the military, and clearly intended that their message be understood as one of Trump giving illegal orders to the military given all the other Democrat statements made about Trump.None of those people will be prosecuted because it’s an incredibly grey area. However, there are plenty of areas that are not gray. I hope troops are given an education on legal v. Illegal orders.
it is not part of the training. It should be, but protecting the front line troops from legal issues has never been a high priority for our governmentI do not know, I have been told its part of the training, if not it really SHOULD be.
those 6, at the least, by issuing a very vague statement with zero followup of what is, and isn't, illegalWho did that?