Life's little contradiction

That statement is false because it confuses correlation, opinion, and moral judgment with objective proof.

Why It is false.

  1. No Evidence of Immorality
    • Being college‑educated, financially secure, or registered as a Democrat does not inherently make someone immoral.
    • Morality is judged by actions (e.g., honesty, compassion, harm to others), not by education level, income, or political affiliation.
    • The claim takes a broad group (“college educated Democrats who support social services”) and labels them all “immoral assholes bound for Hell.”
    • That’s a sweeping generalization without evidence, and it ignores the diversity of values and behaviors within that group.

Key Point

The statement is false because it pretends opinion is proof, relies on sweeping generalizations, and equates political affiliation with moral destiny. In reality, morality is not determined by education, wealth, or party registration.
Relying on AI is like relying on a sophomore in high school to do your college homework...
 
Relaying on research is the key to learning. And don't pretend you don't use AI.

You were made to look like a fool. Don't act that way, and you won't look like a fool.

Roobaby learned that the hard way. When convo is polite, I am the nicest guy.
 
Last edited:
Nature gives rights? How?
MORON ALERT!!! :palm:

It's called natural rights jackass. God you leftist halfwits are seriously stupid.

Natural rights are inherent to all human beings, independent of government or societal laws. They are not granted by any authority but are an intrinsic part of human nature. They are often described as universal moral principles that cannot be reversed by government laws.
 
That statement is false because it confuses correlation, opinion, and moral judgment with objective proof.

Why It is false.

  1. No Evidence of Immorality
    • Being college‑educated, financially secure, or registered as a Democrat does not inherently make someone immoral.
    • Morality is judged by actions (e.g., honesty, compassion, harm to others), not by education level, income, or political affiliation.
    • The claim takes a broad group (“college educated Democrats who support social services”) and labels them all “immoral assholes bound for Hell.”
    • That’s a sweeping generalization without evidence, and it ignores the diversity of values and behaviors within that group.

Key Point

The statement is false because it pretends opinion is proof, relies on sweeping generalizations, and equates political affiliation with moral destiny. In reality, morality is not determined by education, wealth, or party registration.
Where did you copy and paste this bullshit from shit-for-brains? :laugh:
 
Say it: President Piggy.
Cry harder whiney piggy.

200.webp
 
Relaying on research is the key to learning. And don't pretend you don't use AI.

You were made to look like a fool. Don't act that way, and you won't look like a fool.

Roobaby learned that the hard way. When convo is polite, I am the nicest guy.
dumb
adjective
\ ˈdəm \

1a: lacking intelligence : STUPID

b: showing a lack of intelligence

c: requiring no intelligence

d: not having the capability to process data
 
So given that tall or most of the current christo-fascists that currently occupy all 3 branches of government have "achieved" the higher levels of education in our society ... yet they represent, promote and implement the vilest components of the human condition ... speaks volumes to their push to hollow out or severely reduce the public education system in this country.
 
So given that tall or most of the current christo-fascists that currently occupy all 3 branches of government have "achieved" the higher levels of education in our society ... yet they represent, promote and implement the vilest components of the human condition ... speaks volumes to their push to hollow out or severely reduce the public education system in this country.
Elite schools like Harvard and Yale essentially are conservative.
 
And, the proof is that more college educated people who are well off demand the government give the poor social services, and are registered as Democrats, actually are immoral, rotten assholes bound for Hell.
:palm: For YOUR education:

... In some countries a distinction is drawn between “social services,” denoting programs, such as health care and education, that serve the general population, and “welfare services,” denoting aid directed to vulnerable groups, such as the poor, the disabled, or the delinquent. According to another classification, remedial services address the basic needs of individuals in acute or chronic distress; preventive services seek to reduce the pressures and obstacles that cause such distress; and supportive services attempt, through educational, health, employment, and other programs, to maintain and improve the functioning of individuals in society. Social welfare services originated as emergency measures that were to be applied when all else failed. However, they are now generally regarded as a necessary function in any society and a means not only of rescuing the endangered but also of fostering a society’s ongoing, corporate well-being.
www.britannica.com/topic/social-service


Just to let you know, people like Warren Buffet, Steve Jobs, Steve Jobs, Tim Cook, Ruth Bader Ginsberg all went through the public education system.

The point of the OP is to remind folks that given that all or most of the current christo-fascists that currently occupy all 3 branches of government have "achieved" the higher levels of education in our society ... yet they represent, promote and implement the vilest components of the human condition ... speaks volumes to their push to hollow out or severely reduce the public education system in this country.
 
Back
Top