ICE agents committing assaults and other crimes

Nordberg said:
Shame on ICE is correct. This is their mess. It actually goes to Miller who is building a ruthless Gestapo type army. Trump is waddling along in his footsteps.
Click to expand...
They're not the ones causing the chaos... This is all
Mnnesota's fault...
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
https://bsky.app/profile/malena.bsky.social%2Fpost%2F3mchax4lzys25
View: https://bsky.app/profile/malena.bsky.social/post/3mchax4lzys25
Click to expand...
Why did the airbags deploy? Those white things hanging down are side curtain airbags.

69765070_large.jpg
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Poor Toby the toddler can't tell reality from AI. Get out of the cult and you will find that what I post here has been vetted.

By the way, the video of the woman saying she has to go to a doctor's appointment is quite long and is available to see. What do you think she was doing 2 minutes earlier? Is it what your delusional cult members told you to think?
Click to expand...
Vetted? LOL. I watched the longer video, dumbass. I watched as she refused to follow simple instructions. The officers repeatedly told her to move her car.

Personally, I don't know anyone so dumb that they can't follow those simple orders and know that not doing so never ends well. The radicalized drone driver was there to impede federal officers.

The minivan warriors have been trained to claim they're on the way to an appointment or church or whatever bullshit they make up and scream for the cameras, as if doing so will allow them to get away with it. Oops, sucks to be a radicalized moron, doesn't it?

She has already been outed as a radical agitator, not some ditzy house mom that was confused. This is one of hundreds of videos put out there, cut and edited to purposely eliminate any exculpatory evidence that tells the whole story.

I haven't seen a single example of federal officers doing anything they are not justified doing, and every pathetic example you idiots think is too rough or unjustified, like pepper spray or throwdowns, could have been easily avoided. How? If your side of the aisle and your drones would stop acting like spoiled toddlers, grow up, and let ICE do their job, it's just that simple.

Watching the Governor and the Mayor along with the rest of Minnesota's libtard politicians fanning the flames of the insurrectionists should make it crystal clear what they're up to. I promise you it isn't keeping their people safe; they are desperate to get the feds out of Minnesota because they are all in on the blatant fraud game they set up with the Somalis.

Guess what? Everywhere there are large numbers of Somalis, there is widespread fraud. Do I care what color their skin is? Not at all. What do I care about? Stopping fraud and deporting people here illegally.

What do you idiots want? The feds out of Minnesota so the fraud continues and illegal criminals have a safe place to terrorize law-abiding citizens.
 
Tobytone said:
Vetted? LOL. I watched the longer video, dumbass. I watched as she refused to follow simple instructions. The officers repeatedly told her to move her car.
Click to expand...
Interesting since you just made the case she was following orders when they attacked her and pulled her out of the car.
Tobytone said:
Personally, I don't know anyone so dumb that they can't follow those simple orders and know that not doing so never ends well. The radicalized drone driver was there to impede federal officers.

The minivan warriors have been trained to claim they're on the way to an appointment or church or whatever bullshit they make up and scream for the cameras, as if doing so will allow them to get away with it. Oops, sucks to be a radicalized moron, doesn't it?

She has already been outed as a radical agitator, not some ditzy house mom that was confused. This is one of hundreds of videos put out there, cut and edited to purposely eliminate any exculpatory evidence that tells the whole story.
Click to expand...
LOL. Cult members seem to have a lot of delusions and then share those delusions. It seems you are in the cult since you share their delusions.
Tobytone said:
I haven't seen a single example of federal officers doing anything they are not justified doing, and every pathetic example you idiots think is too rough or unjustified, like pepper spray or throwdowns, could have been easily avoided. How? If your side of the aisle and your drones would stop acting like spoiled toddlers, grow up, and let ICE do their job, it's just that simple.
Click to expand...
That's interesting since courts have specifically said the opposite of you. Who should we believe? A cult member like you or an independent judiciary that has actually looked at evidence?
Tobytone said:
Watching the Governor and the Mayor along with the rest of Minnesota's libtard politicians fanning the flames of the insurrectionists should make it crystal clear what they're up to. I promise you it isn't keeping their people safe; they are desperate to get the feds out of Minnesota because they are all in on the blatant fraud game they set up with the Somalis.

Guess what? Everywhere there are large numbers of Somalis, there is widespread fraud. Do I care what color their skin is? Not at all. What do I care about? Stopping fraud and deporting people here illegally.

What do you idiots want? The feds out of Minnesota so the fraud continues and illegal criminals have a safe place to terrorize law-abiding citizens.
Click to expand...
Everywhere there are Republicans there is wide spread fraud.
Rick Scott oversaw the largest medicare fraud. Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of fraud. Why do you defend fraud?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Interesting since you just made the case she was following orders when they attacked her and pulled her out of the car.

LOL. Cult members seem to have a lot of delusions and then share those delusions. It seems you are in the cult since you share their delusions.

That's interesting since courts have specifically said the opposite of you. Who should we believe? A cult member like you or an independent judiciary that has actually looked at evidence?

Everywhere there are Republicans there is wide spread fraud.
Rick Scott oversaw the largest medicare fraud. Trump was found guilty of 34 counts of fraud. Why do you defend fraud?
Click to expand...
First, no clue how you think I suggested that dumb radicalized drone chick followed orders, care to share your hallucination with the class, genius?

Second, pot calling the kettle black, obviously.

Third, you definitely shouldn't trust the courts until they climb past the peons and the delusional TDS radicalized scum who've proven their atrocious judgment a million times since Trump took office. An unprecedented avalanche of decisions have been reversed or overturned, faster than your party can rig an election. So if you're implying that some credibility-shredded dumbass judge's purely political rulings make something true, you're even denser than your average CNN viewer or JPP leftist.

And fourth, Rick Scott? Hilarious you dredge up that one up out of desperation. Key differences in how he handled the fraud exposure: he resigned like a grown-up should, instead of pulling the classic libtard stunt of clinging to power until they're hauled out in handcuffs, wailing about 'injustice.' Out of thirty whistleblowers, only one libtard loudmouth claimed he had 'no doubt Rick Scott was the head of a vast criminal enterprise,' LOL, with zero evidence, just clickbait headlines from your echo chamber. No charges, no proof, just hot air. Minnesota? That's a whole different swamp of Somali fraud rings your side actually enabled, every slimy detail exposing your hypocrisy. Whistle blowers? They've all said and they've given evidence that several of the democrat leaders were very much aware of the fraud and did nothing, a little different than Rick Scott's medicare fraud case. Step up your game, Wally, this is weak, even for a radicalized moron.

As for Trump being 'corruption incarnate,' LOL, he's the squeakiest clean operator Washington's ever seen, a walking miracle in that cesspool. No one's been poked, prodded, and persecuted more than Trump, with more subpoenas than your heroes have scandals, record-shattering scrutiny including his sons. More investigations than any politician alive, impeached twice on zero crimes, millions of pages rifled through, illegal wiretaps, spied-on emails and phones for him, his family, his crew, endless court clown shows, and what do they got? Not one legit conviction except those bogus, made-up 34 felonies you drones drool over, and even that's getting nuked on appeal.

Trump's one NDA? Hardly 34 felonies, I pored over every scrap of 'evidence' and guess what, it was all worthless garbage, LOL. The entire sham hinged on the word of one sleazy lawyer snagging a plea deal to save his own ass from prison, that's your star witness? Jury instructions were a convoluted joke, handing jurors a pick-your-poison menu of reasons to convict. Enjoy your 'felon' chants for now, of course Trump flipped it into millions from mugshot merch and skyrocketed support because your lawfare reeks of un-American desperation. That case is toast, the NY court itself broke the law by letting jurors mix and match three ways to say he broke it, shredding the Constitution's ironclad right to a unanimous verdict in criminal cases, a no-brainer from Ramos v. Louisiana. By serving up that menu, they guaranteed no real unanimity, tough concept for a brainwashed drone, but hey, good news? You don't need to grasp it, it'll get overturned like every other witch hunt against him and his family. If you want a corruption smackdown between the parties, bring it, libtard, we'll bury you in Biden family grift alone.

You can pretend this answer is from some cult, but the truth is, it comes from a normal American with a brain and the resources to decipher the truth live everyone else. You have the same tools, but choose to remain blind on purpose. Why? I suspect it's mostly because you're a coward like so many libtards. To open your eyes and see what is so obvious would be very scary in your little world of like-minded radicals, you might lose your place in the libtard hierarchy and that take courage. Since you're light on courage, I suspect you'll die an idiot and a fool, sadly.
 
Tobytone said:
First, no clue how you think I suggested that dumb radicalized drone chick followed orders, care to share your hallucination with the class, genius?

Second, pot calling the kettle black, obviously.

Third, you definitely shouldn't trust the courts until they climb past the peons and the delusional TDS radicalized scum who've proven their atrocious judgment a million times since Trump took office. An unprecedented avalanche of decisions have been reversed or overturned, faster than your party can rig an election. So if you're implying that some credibility-shredded dumbass judge's purely political rulings make something true, you're even denser than your average CNN viewer or JPP leftist.

And fourth, Rick Scott? Hilarious you dredge up that one up out of desperation. Key differences in how he handled the fraud exposure: he resigned like a grown-up should, instead of pulling the classic libtard stunt of clinging to power until they're hauled out in handcuffs, wailing about 'injustice.' Out of thirty whistleblowers, only one libtard loudmouth claimed he had 'no doubt Rick Scott was the head of a vast criminal enterprise,' LOL, with zero evidence, just clickbait headlines from your echo chamber. No charges, no proof, just hot air. Minnesota? That's a whole different swamp of Somali fraud rings your side actually enabled, every slimy detail exposing your hypocrisy. Whistle blowers? They've all said and they've given evidence that several of the democrat leaders were very much aware of the fraud and did nothing, a little different than Rick Scott's medicare fraud case. Step up your game, Wally, this is weak, even for a radicalized moron.

As for Trump being 'corruption incarnate,' LOL, he's the squeakiest clean operator Washington's ever seen, a walking miracle in that cesspool. No one's been poked, prodded, and persecuted more than Trump, with more subpoenas than your heroes have scandals, record-shattering scrutiny including his sons. More investigations than any politician alive, impeached twice on zero crimes, millions of pages rifled through, illegal wiretaps, spied-on emails and phones for him, his family, his crew, endless court clown shows, and what do they got? Not one legit conviction except those bogus, made-up 34 felonies you drones drool over, and even that's getting nuked on appeal.

Trump's one NDA? Hardly 34 felonies, I pored over every scrap of 'evidence' and guess what, it was all worthless garbage, LOL. The entire sham hinged on the word of one sleazy lawyer snagging a plea deal to save his own ass from prison, that's your star witness? Jury instructions were a convoluted joke, handing jurors a pick-your-poison menu of reasons to convict. Enjoy your 'felon' chants for now, of course Trump flipped it into millions from mugshot merch and skyrocketed support because your lawfare reeks of un-American desperation. That case is toast, the NY court itself broke the law by letting jurors mix and match three ways to say he broke it, shredding the Constitution's ironclad right to a unanimous verdict in criminal cases, a no-brainer from Ramos v. Louisiana. By serving up that menu, they guaranteed no real unanimity, tough concept for a brainwashed drone, but hey, good news? You don't need to grasp it, it'll get overturned like every other witch hunt against him and his family. If you want a corruption smackdown between the parties, bring it, libtard, we'll bury you in Biden family grift alone.

You can pretend this answer is from some cult, but the truth is, it comes from a normal American with a brain and the resources to decipher the truth live everyone else. You have the same tools, but choose to remain blind on purpose. Why? I suspect it's mostly because you're a coward like so many libtards. To open your eyes and see what is so obvious would be very scary in your little world of like-minded radicals, you might lose your place in the libtard hierarchy and that take courage. Since you're light on courage, I suspect you'll die an idiot and a fool, sadly.
Click to expand...
Quite the delusional rant from cult member, Toby the toddler. Normal Americans with brains don't denigrate the US courts because they don't like the outcomes. Calling Trump "squeakiest clean operator" only proves you are in a cult. If you had actually looked at the evidence in Trump's trial you would know it didn't hang on the word of one witness. But since you are in the cult, you seem to think your delusions are reality.
 
Last edited:
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Quite the delusional rant from cult member, Toby the toddler. Normal Americans with brains don't denigrate the US courts because they don't like the outcomes. Calling Trump "squeakiest clean operator" only proves you are in a cult. If you had actually looked at the evidence in Trump's trial you would know it didn't hand on the word of one witness. But since you are in the cult, you seem to think your delusions are reality.
Click to expand...
It's hilarious that you say that I'm the one in a cult, LOL. You're the drone here who just slings baseless accusations without a shred of backup. Why? Because you got nothing, zip, zero.

You see, I actually read every page of the so-called 'evidence' in that sham trial, you clearly didn't, which is why I can state flat-out that the only thing even pretending to tie Trump directly to anything was hearsay and the sworn lies from that sleazy rat Cohen, who was singing for his plea deal like the slimy little creep he is. Of course, that's not the only 'evidence'. I could tell you all about on the rest but you wouldn't believe me anyways. My personal favorite? The mountain of blatantly biased, clickbait news articles the prosecution trotted in as if they were actual proof, (For the record, LOL). Journalism as exhibits. Peak libtard world.

Wally here clearly skipped homework night and swallowed the MSNBC narrative hook, line, and sinker, just like millions of other brainwashed sheep. He's batshit crazy, and so are the rest of you drones who've been radicalized into drooling idiots. Back in the day your side could at least fake a coherent argument, but years of TDS have dumbed you down to the point where 'debate' means hurling tired insults while pretending you're on the moral high ground.

His whole response? One endless whine-fest of name-calling, zero counter-facts, zero refutation of why the case will be getting overturned, zero list of reasons I'm wrong, and big shock, zero examples of those mythical 'other damning pieces of evidence' that supposedly prove Trump personally committed a crime. All he'd have to do is drop one real zinger from the transcript to shut me up, but nope, crickets. Weak sauce from a weak mind.

Wally and his fellow drones are textbook members of the libtard cult I've been calling out for years. He projects like a broken projector, accusing me of cult behavior while proving exactly how a cultist argues: feelings over facts, insults over substance, and blind faith in the narrative no matter how many times it gets debunked. Classic.
 
Tobytone said:
It's hilarious that you say that I'm the one in a cult, LOL. You're the drone here who just slings baseless accusations without a shred of backup. Why? Because you got nothing, zip, zero.

You see, I actually read every page of the so-called 'evidence' in that sham trial, you clearly didn't, which is why I can state flat-out that the only thing even pretending to tie Trump directly to anything was hearsay and the sworn lies from that sleazy rat Cohen, who was singing for his plea deal like the slimy little creep he is. Of course, that's not the only 'evidence'. I could tell you all about on the rest but you wouldn't believe me anyways. My personal favorite? The mountain of blatantly biased, clickbait news articles the prosecution trotted in as if they were actual proof, (For the record, LOL). Journalism as exhibits. Peak libtard world.
Click to expand...
LOL. You are quite funny as you make claims that clearly can't be true. Are you seriously claiming that Trump's signature on a check is hearsay. How is Trump's signature hearsay? Tell us what the cult thinks.
Tobytone said:
Wally here clearly skipped homework night and swallowed the MSNBC narrative hook, line, and sinker, just like millions of other brainwashed sheep. He's batshit crazy, and so are the rest of you drones who've been radicalized into drooling idiots. Back in the day your side could at least fake a coherent argument, but years of TDS have dumbed you down to the point where 'debate' means hurling tired insults while pretending you're on the moral high ground.

His whole response? One endless whine-fest of name-calling, zero counter-facts, zero refutation of why the case will be getting overturned, zero list of reasons I'm wrong, and big shock, zero examples of those mythical 'other damning pieces of evidence' that supposedly prove Trump personally committed a crime. All he'd have to do is drop one real zinger from the transcript to shut me up, but nope, crickets. Weak sauce from a weak mind.

Wally and his fellow drones are textbook members of the libtard cult I've been calling out for years. He projects like a broken projector, accusing me of cult behavior while proving exactly how a cultist argues: feelings over facts, insults over substance, and blind faith in the narrative no matter how many times it gets debunked. Classic.
Click to expand...
You talk of endless whining as you endlessly whine and make idiotic claims. You clearly don't have a clue what hearsay actually is.

Here is one of the checks that Trump signed and the notes that Weisselberg made showing how they calculated the payments.
www.scribd.com

Legal Payment Records | PDF | Donald Trump | American Government

This document is an invoice for legal services provided to Donald J. Trump by Michael D. Cohen for $35,000. It includes billing details like the date, invoice number, description and amounts. A check was issued to Michael D. Cohen Esq for the full amount on May 23, 2017.
www.scribd.com www.scribd.com
 
TOP said:
They're not the ones causing the chaos... This is all
Mnnesota's fault...
Click to expand...
They sure as hell are. This is ICEs fault. Actually, whoever created them. They are trained to ignore laws and police norms and let loose on the people. The end product is a citizenry that is afraid of Trump's personal army.
You can see what you want. When they walk up to a car, and their first act is to smash the windows, you should wonder why. They also cut their seat belts to make it easier to drag them out of the car and stomp on them.
 
Nordberg said:
They sure as hell are. This is ICEs fault.
Click to expand...
It is not ICE's fault that she intentionally tried to intefere with federal officers and then tried to run over one of them!
Nordberg said:
Actually, whoever created them. They are trained to ignore laws and police norms and let loose on the people.
Click to expand...
The are ENFORCING the law, Sybil.
Nordberg said:
The end product is a citizenry that is afraid of Trump's personal army.
Click to expand...
Not his personal army, Sybil.
Nordberg said:
You can see what you want. When they walk up to a car, and their first act is to smash the windows, you should wonder why.
Click to expand...
The didn't smash any window until the shots, when she tried to run over a federal officer.
Nordberg said:
They also cut their seat belts to make it easier to drag them out of the car and stomp on them.
Click to expand...
If the seat belt is in the way of an arrest, it is cut. The car is impounded anyway.
 
Guno צְבִי said:
ICE and Border Patrol have adopted the tactics of the KKK’s masked violence for the same reasons. We’ve seen their playbook before: Anonymity. Fear. Terror. Division. Unlawful arrests. No due process.
Click to expand...
The KKK was created and is still supported by the DEMOCRATS. They are lawless violent faction of the DEMOCRAT party. So is Antifa and so is BLM.

The arrests are lawful. Enforcing the law is not like violent DEMOCRATS that riot, loot, support organized crime, support insurrection, harbor illegal aliens, and harbor criminals.

You can't blame your violent factions on anybody else, Gunky.
 
Nordberg said:
She was calm and spoke nicely to the cop. She was not panicked. The cop was hunting for someone to kill. There was no crime for her to be arrested for.
Click to expand...
Attempting to run over a federal officer is a CRIME and you will likely get shot!
The officers were arresting her for BREAKING THE LAW.
It is a CRIME to interfere with federal officers.
It is a CRIME to enter the country illegally. They are immediately subject to deportation.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top