Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
<snicker>
ICE agents committing assaults and other crimes
- Thread starter Poor Richard Saunders
- Start date
Tobytone
Verified User
Time will tell. Only a radicalized libtard drone would think that our military walking down our streets to quell a violent insurrection by anti-American rioters would cause a civil war. First of all, what do you think that would look like?
`I see it happening like this. We could hold the line on day one while they killed themselves trying to operate the guns. Tim Walz would be providing shotgun loading classes on Tik Tok, lol. Day two, we'd slaughter any moron that tried to put that Walz training to work. Day three, the libtards wave the white flag just like the French they love so much have perfected.
What will really happen? The little freaks your leaders have created will pretend that they're like the Palestinians and start planting IEDs and using snipers to kill ICE officers, claiming they are fighting for a two-State solution here in America. You heard it here first.
First, honestly, I didn't even realize that you had jumped in to help Wally out, so I thought I was responding to Wally, I think you missed some context there. I obviously know the NDA itself wasn't part of the charge dumbass. I was pointing that out to Wally who seemed to focus on that. The checks are not criminal either, by the way.
Since you're apparently going to cling to those signed checks like they're your security blanket? News flash, genius: Trump signing nine checks from his personal account for 'legal expenses' doesn't prove jack shit about him being guilty of falsifying 34 business records, let alone with intent to hide some phantom election crime. Those checks reimbursed Cohen, sure, but labeling them as legal fees to your own lawyer is standard practice, not a smoking gun of felony fraud. Without Cohen's sleazy, plea-deal testimony flipping like a pancake to save his own ass, those signatures mean zilch, they don't show Trump directed any falsification, knew about doctored ledgers, or intended to break New York election law. It's all inference and wishful thinking from TDS-riddled moron like you.
Again, the whole case was a house of cards built on Cohen's word, irrelevant clickbait articles, and convoluted jury instructions that'll get nuked on appeal. Dicky, it's adorable how you think scribbles on paper equal guilt when real evidence is nowhere in sight. You still haven't provided anything that proves he was guilty. Try harder, maybe you'll actually learn something as you try.
As far as your retarded statement about my condoning fraud because I'm calling out a trial that is an insult to our Constitution is yet another example of damage libtard dope does to a person. Your brain if so fried, you think this trial or 'crime' is in any way similar to knowingly allowing theft of billions of taxpayer dollars, lol. Really, how stupid does a person have to be to make a comparison like that? I guess the answer is, as stupid as Poor Dicky.
You meet the 2 requirements to become ICE: low IQ and full of hate. You can't wait to shoot constitutionally protected people in the face for backtalking you. amirite
Into the Night
Verified User
The Constitution does not protect rioting.
The Constitution does not protect running over people with your car.
The Constitution does not protect crime.
The Constitution does not protect domestic terrorism.
It is YOU full of hate. You are supporting domestic terrorists. You are supporting insurrectionists. It is YOU that hates law enforcement officers. It is YOU that hates Trump.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
All MAGAts are evil anti-Americans who seek the violent overthrow of our Republic with a plan to replace it with a fascist dictatorship.
Tobytone
Verified User
Google it. It shows how definitions are changing over time. Sometimes for justifiable reasons, but lately, it far more often a woke agenda that causes the change. I've seen a lot of definitions change over time. Googles 'Gemini' has a vastly different meaning than the more reliable Merrian's as I generally find to be the case.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
blow it out your fruits of the loom.
You're too stupid to understand what the constitution says.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
go suck more Chinese dicks, traitor.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
But he's correct.
The Constitution does not protect rioting.
The Constitution does not protect running over people with your car.
The Constitution does not protect crime.
The Constitution does not protect domestic terrorism.
I just checked.
... and YOU are spewing HATE without making any sort of constructive point. You are supporting domestic terrorists. You are supporting insurrectionists. You do hate law enforcement officers and Trump.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Your mischaracterization of my question does not answer my question.
What are assault weapons?
I see you are just going to ignore the majority of the evidence. That isn't the way it works in court. You have to address all the evidence. Then you don't get to claim things that were not given in evidence.
It is evidence of fraud when a check is written to pay for work that was never done. Once the fraud of paying for work not done is established, in order to include the check writer in the fraud you need evidence that they knew no work was being performed. Trump's public claims that he knew everything that went on in the company and oversaw all payments for work establish that he knew. Trump was free to get on the stand and testify that he didn't know if he wanted to dispute that public claim. The defense was also free to call Allen Weisselberg to testify that Trump didn't know and they didn't call him either.
It's so funny that you want to bring up the fraud of paying for work that was never done while defending the fraud of paying for work that was never done.
It looks like you were trying to weave something there but all you have is a brown stain to show for it.
Apparently the logic escapes you (IBDaMann)
Monad Portal
Was it me?
you are.
Into the Night
Verified User
That you do. Fortunately, you are locked up your mental institution.
Into the Night
Verified User
The definition of 'shill' hasn't changed.
A shill is a job in a casino. It is a legitimate job. You get paid for it (as much as when you are dealing, anyway). A shill works in a poker room mostly, but sometimes works in the pit area.
Nine people just don't walk up at once to play poker in a casino. They come in one or two at a time.
A poker table is only attractive to a player if it has lots of players. It's no fun playing alone or with just one other player...the game breaks down very quickly.
A shill plays poker. He uses his own money to play. He, like the other shills in the game are there to start the table, making it attractive for customers to join the game. As seats fill in, shills leave the game, always leaving a couple of seats open. Shills must identify who they are if asked. Most shills are also dealers.
Since you are playing with your own money, shills often are 'rocks', folding early, and betting only when they have a near guarantee win. Such players are losing money, but slowly, due to the blind structure of the game.
So, a shill is a legitimate job. They are a fake player to get a poker table started. The more poker tables started, the more dealers the casino will need for them. It's a win for the players, it's a win for the casino, and it's a win for the dealers. Players now have a choice of games they can play. The casino is making more money in the poker room from the rakes. More dealers are needed to deal all those active tables.
Why he considers a 'shill' to be some kind of insult is simply because he doesn't know much English.
An agenda does not redefine any word. Wackos like you describe speak a different language, which I call Liberal. It looks like English, but the words have no meaning or shift meanings at will. It might as well be gobbledegook.
Neither Google nor any dictionary defines any word (other than Google).
Like any software, Gemini is just a name. It takes it's name from a constellation (The Twins). 'Gemini' is a Latin word and is plural for 'geminus', meaning 'twin'. Thus, the constellation known as The Twins is also called 'Gemini'.
The Gemini portion of the moonshot project is aptly named, since it's purpose was to practice handling two spacecraft at once and docking one with the other. It was designed to practice a maneuver critical to eventually landing on the Moon.
I guess Google just decided to name it that to make it sound futuristic or something. Well, that's marketing for you!
Into the Night
Verified User
Inversion fallacy.
Evidence of what. Writing a check isn't a crime. Paying a person isn't a crime. Neither are fraud.
Nope. That's not fraud either. It's just a payment. Giving to a charity is not for work that has been done. Paying your taxes is not for work that has been done. Paying a contractor to start building a house is not for work that has been done.
Meh. Happens all the time.
Meh. Happens all the time. Making a payment is not fraud.
He does. He owns them.
Payment for work performed is also not fraud.
Private business records are not a public claim.
Testify of what? That she was paid? That an NDA was established?
Paying for work that was never done is not fraud. It happens all the time. I've already given a few examples.
Paying for work that was never done is not fraud. Paying someone is not fraud.
Into the Night
Verified User
Inversion fallacy.
Apparently you think paying people constitutes fraud.
Apparently you think paying for work not performed is fraud.
Apparently you think writing a check is fraud.
Weird.