Exit strategy?

Trump is famous for cuttin' and runnin' when things get dicey. :thup:

The $64 Question is "How many lives and how much taxpayer money will this cost us?"
More importantly embarrassment to the Empire, which is very clear that its intention is to abuse the rest of the people on this planet.
 
He did actually outline what his goals are:

We're going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground. It will be totally again obliterated. We're going to annihilate their navy. We're going to ensure that the region's terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the world and attack our forces, and no longer use their IEDs, or roadside bombs as they are sometimes called, to so gravely wound and kill thousands and thousands of people, including many Americans. And we will ensure that Iran does not obtain a nuclear weapon. It's a very simple message. They will never have a nuclear weapon.
We’re going to obliterate what we already obiliterated?

Israel neutralized Iran’s proxies, and cannot recall the last time I read of an IED killing an American, point being Iran wasn’t currently a threat, and we were told Iran didn’t have a nuclear potential last year, is this going to be a annual event?

None of what you listed are real benchmarks, measurements of which we can see what success means, are we going to be bombing until Iran hasn’t a navy
 
We’re going to obliterate what we already obiliterated?

Israel neutralized Iran’s proxies, and cannot recall the last time I read of an IED killing an American, point being Iran wasn’t currently a threat, and we were told Iran didn’t have a nuclear potential last year, is this going to be a annual event?

None of what you listed are real benchmarks, measurements of which we can see what success means, are we going to be bombing until Iran hasn’t a navy
I'm not disagreeing - but I am aware of the hypocrisy

You said he did not state goals - which is completely untrue. he also can make bold claims that his followers swallow hook, line, and sinker....

such as.....
----------
The strikes are needed to ensure that Libya's fragile new Government of National Accord is "able to finish the job" and drive the militants out.


------------
now look at that - a war powers use for military intervention, and he doesn't even lie to us about how our lives are at risk. is that better?
 
I'm not disagreeing - but I am aware of the hypocrisy

You said he did not state goals - which is completely untrue. he also can make bold claims that his followers swallow hook, line, and sinker....

such as.....
----------
The strikes are needed to ensure that Libya's fragile new Government of National Accord is "able to finish the job" and drive the militants out.


------------
now look at that - a war powers use for military intervention, and he doesn't even lie to us about how our lives are at risk. is that better?
Derp derp
 
I'm not disagreeing - but I am aware of the hypocrisy

You said he did not state goals - which is completely untrue. he also can make bold claims that his followers swallow hook, line, and sinker....

such as.....
----------
The strikes are needed to ensure that Libya's fragile new Government of National Accord is "able to finish the job" and drive the militants out.


------------
now look at that - a war powers use for military intervention, and he doesn't even lie to us about how our lives are at risk. is that better?
He hasn’t, lot of generalities, but no real goal that Americans could use to judge success or need to end hostilities
 
He hasn’t, lot of generalities, but no real goal that Americans could use to judge success or need to end hostilities
The Obama quote was also generalities. it also didn't even pretend to be about our safety.

so your opinion now is of little importance to me. you are a partisan shit stain and not someone with clear articulate views
 
Back
Top