'No Kings' protests return Saturday across the Triangle; expect traffic delays

More than 3,100 events were planned in all 50 states, with more than 9 million people expected to participate,


ST. PAUL, Minn. — Crowds of people protested Saturday against the war in Iran and President Donald Trump’s actions, in “No Kings” rallies across the U.S. and in Europe. Minnesota took center stage, in what organizers expected to be mass demonstrations involving millions of people.

Thousands of people stood shoulder-to-shoulder on the Minnesota Capitol lawn and surrounding streets in St. Paul. Some held upside down U.S. flags, historically a sign of distress.

 
Congratulations on documenting your microscopic dick energy for the world to see, must be tough when the only thing you'll ever crush beneath you is a protestor's foot while the rest of us laugh at the sad, shriveled husk of a human being you've become. Hope your mom's proud, she probably regrets not swallowing.
 
Seriously, at least skim over your sentence before hitting reply, you moron. Explain coincided intentional manslaughter. It's scary how stupid you are. What you are trying to say is, if he saw the person and ran over and killed the him or her, he's guilty of 2nd degree murder, not some new legal term 'intentional manslaughter. If you're going to be a moron, try being a slightly smarter moron next time.
That is not what Legion meant. His post was intended to be shocking on purpose.
 
No worries. My day is good.

I'm not posting frantically to try to downplay a day where it looks like close to 10 million have showed up to express themselves & how they feel about this incompetent admin.
Ten million is the number you're hearing. What did I tell everyone? What's important? You feel good about the number. Let me make your day. It was just reported that without doubt more than 30 million people showed up. Wow, 30 million!! I can't imagine how good your day is now with this solid evidence of the massive crowd having a huge impact for good. Congrats, lol.

Now, go tell you wife and celebrate. Wait........I'm having a physic vision right now........hold on...........that's really strange. I see an energizer bunny holding a pair of scissors moving along in this huge room munching carpet like a Pac-Man game. WTF? Any ideas?
 
That is not what Legion meant. His post was intended to be shocking on purpose.
Let me let you in on a little secret. I have no idea who Legion is or why the name is constantly brought up. I've never seen it on any board. I haven't bothered to ask, because I'm certain that the answer will not be worth the trouble. You'll need to find a different reference for me.
 
Let me let you in on a little secret. I have no idea who Legion is or why the name is constantly brought up. I've never seen it on any board. I haven't bothered to ask, because I'm certain that the answer will not be worth the trouble. You'll need to find a different reference for me.
@Diogenes is @Legion. He has been trolling and spamming JPP, pretending to be on either side, since probably JPP was founded.

He probably is the reason why @Damocles plans to impose the limit of threads created per day.

You probably would have been angry at him if you had been here while he was pro Kamala.
 
If he does it on purpose then yes , it could be intentional manslaughter.
Sure, it 'could' be, if the prosecutor is as dumb as you are. The correct charge would be either 1st or 2nd degree murder if someone intentionally ran someone over resulting in death. If you want to pretend you're not a moron, that's fine with me. I really don't care about playing hypothetical lawyer with a mouth breathing simpleton. Work on you English before you dive into legal arguments.
 
Sure, it 'could' be, if the prosecutor is as dumb as you are. The correct charge would be either 1st or 2nd degree murder if someone intentionally ran someone over resulting in death. If you want to pretend you're not a moron, that's fine with me. I really don't care about playing hypothetical lawyer with a mouth breathing simpleton. Work on you English before you dive into legal arguments.
That WAS my point.
The correct charge would be either 1st or 2nd degree murder if someone intentionally ran someone over resulting in death. If you intentionally ran someone over resulting in death it could be murder.
 
@Diogenes is @Legion. He has been trolling and spamming JPP, pretending to be on either side, since probably JPP was founded.

He probably is the reason why @Damocles plans to impose the limit of threads created per day.

You probably would have been angry at him if you had been here while he was pro Kamala.
I'm aware of Diogenes being a troll. I'm sure he'll remember the rather ruthless hammering I gave him when I first started. I did not know he was the Legion everyone always talks about. And for the record, I agree with a thread limit. I'd put it at no more than two per day. That would devastate the three I currently have on ignore. They could easily complete with Diogenes for the thread count per day race. Far too many morons here post every click-bait headline they see. It's absurd, where do I vote for the thread limit rule?
 
That WAS my point.
The correct charge would be either 1st or 2nd degree murder if someone intentionally ran someone over resulting in death. If you intentionally ran someone over resulting in death it could be murder.
Hilarious! Do you see why I advised you to work on English before legal arguments? Sentence No. 2 says what sentence No.1 says. (what I wrote, by the way) Do you see why I advised you to work on English before legal arguments? (See what I did there?)

Not to mention, why did you say if you were a DA you'd charge him 'intentional manslaughter.' if you meant murder 1 or 2? Do you see problem No.2 here?
 
Back
Top