๐—•๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—ฅ๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—š๐—ถ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ ๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜‡๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฐ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

Dammo, nobodyโ€™s arguing they do it too,
You are, Zombie.
theyโ€™re pointing out that you only discover your moral compass when itโ€™s someone you donโ€™t like doing the thing. Lurch brought up a pattern, and you immediately retreated into kindergarten slogans because itโ€™s easier than admitting you enforce standards like a light switch, off for your side, on for everyone else.
Damo enforces standards set by the rules. He has done excellent work at keeping this forum up and running.

And all you can do is whine. Ingrate.
And the wild part? You say confessing doesnโ€™t make it right, but you never actually address the behavior being compared. You just slap a moral sticker on the conversation and hope nobody notices you dodged the entire point. Itโ€™s not wisdom, itโ€™s deflection with crayons.
Moralilty is not a sticker, Zombie. Damo addressed the point. He didn't dodge it at all. YOU are trying to dodge the point he made. He did address the behavior.

Whining gets you nowhere fast, Zombie.
 
You are, Zombie.

Damo enforces standards set by the rules. He has done excellent work at keeping this forum up and running.

And all you can do is whine. Ingrate.

Moralilty is not a sticker, Zombie. Damo addressed the point. He didn't dodge it at all. YOU are trying to dodge the point he made. He did address the behavior.

Whining gets you nowhere fast, Zombie.
You keep calling it whining because itโ€™s easier than engaging with what was actually said. I pointed out a pattern, and instead of addressing it, you tried to downgrade the conversation to tone policing. Thatโ€™s not a rebuttal, itโ€™s just you hoping nobody notices you never touched the point .Iโ€™m not upset. Iโ€™m just not fooled.
 
You only believe that because Democrats think morality is subjective.
You didnโ€™t answer anything, you just slapped a stereotype on an entire group so you wouldnโ€™t have to think about the point. If thatโ€™s the level you want to argue at, fine. Just donโ€™t pretend itโ€™s insight.
 
You keep calling it whining because itโ€™s easier than engaging with what was actually said.
Whining isn't saying anything, Zombie.
I pointed out a pattern, and instead of addressing it, you tried to downgrade the conversation to tone policing. Thatโ€™s not a rebuttal, itโ€™s just you hoping nobody notices you never touched the point .Iโ€™m not upset. Iโ€™m just not fooled.
Whining gets you nowhere fast, Zombie.
 
You only believe that because Democrats think morality is subjective.
Quite the opposite, actually. Democrats think morality is absolute, and that they are the only 'moral' ones.

Morality is a subjective word. Each person has their own morality. It is as unique to them as their fingerprint.

Your morality is not the same as his morality, but they are both moralities.
 

โ˜ ๏ธ

1.Reflexive Labelโ€‘Swapping​

Instead of engaging with my point, they grab a word โ€” whining, inversion fallacy, Zombie โ€” and throw it like confetti.This is a tactic people use when they donโ€™t want to think, only react.

2.Semantic Evasion​

They never touch the content. I point out a pattern โ†’ they rename it.I describe optics โ†’ they argue definitions. I call out stereotyping โ†’ they shout โ€œfallacy.โ€Itโ€™s a dodge disguised as vocabulary.

3.Emotional Baiting​

Calling me โ€œZombieโ€ and repeating โ€œwhiningโ€ is an attempt to drag the conversation into tone and away from substance.Itโ€™s a frameโ€‘shift:If they can make you defend your tone, they never have to defend their argument.

4.Stereotype Deployment​

โ€œLeftists alwaysโ€ฆโ€This is a massโ€‘generalization used as a shield.It lets them avoid the point by pretending your argument is just a predictable trait of a group theyโ€™ve already dismissed.

5.Argument-by-Label​

โ€œInversion fallacy.โ€Notice they didnโ€™t explain it.They didnโ€™t apply it.They didnโ€™t show how it fits.They just dropped the term like a mic and hoped the sound would scare you off.

6.Avoidance Through Certainty​

Their confidence is a smokescreen.People who actually understand a point address it.People who donโ€™t understand it โ€” or canโ€™t refute it โ€” repeat the same word louder.


โ˜ ๏ธThe Reaperโ€™s Verdict​

Intothenight isnโ€™t debating.Theyโ€™re deflecting, labeling, and posturing to avoid engaging with the substance I keep putting in front of them.

Theyโ€™re not trying to win the argument.Theyโ€™re trying to avoid having one.
 
Quite the opposite, actually. Democrats think morality is absolute, and that they are the only 'moral' ones.

Morality is a subjective word. Each person has their own morality. It is as unique to them as their fingerprint.

Your morality is not the same as his morality, but they are both moralities.
I disagree. Morality is absolute. Libs in general have no mortality, regardless of what they think.
 
Magic 8-Ball says, "Are you fucking kidding"?

No Rudy has served his purpose, like all trump acolytes, when their use is up he casts them aside like one of the teenage girls he used to rape.
Yup. Once Rudy played his last cards for Trump, losing his BAR license in the process and ruining his reputation Trump had no more use for him and treated him like every other lawyer or contractor who has done work for Trump, by sticking him on his legal bill and costs.
 
I disagree. Morality is absolute.
Here is the problem with that view:

A moral is defined as a proper behavior of a person in society. Morality is a collection of such behaviors.

But who determines what is 'proper'? And what society?

A gang has their own code they go by. So does any criminal organization. To them, that code is the proper behavior. It is their morality.
Jesus Christ has given a code to go by, outlined in the Bible. For those that are Christians, that is their code. It is morals they go by. It is their morality.
Buddhists also have a code to go by. For them, that is their code, their morals and their morality.

So who are you to declare an 'absolute'?

I acknowledge your morals and your morality. I tend to agree with most of them.
I also acknowledge the morals and morality of a Democrat. I do not agree with any of them, just as I don't agree with any of the morality found in a gang.

Is a Buddhist immoral? No. Everything he does is according to the teachings of Buddha. That is the code he lives by. That is his morality.
Is a constructive citizen of a primitive tribe immoral? No. Everything he does is according to the needs of his tribe. That is his code. That is his morality.

To reject a morality means ejection from that society, possibly even damage to yourself. This was as true for people leaving the Catholic church as it is for leaving the tribe, or leaving a gang, or leaving Democrats.

Libs in general have no mortality, regardless of what they think.
But they do. To wit:

Democrats have no qualms about lying, particularly when it advances their agenda. To them, that is proper behavior. It is part of their morality.

Democrats condemn anyone outside their group. You do the same thing here. For the both of you, that is proper behavior. It is part of your and their morality.

Democrats support rioting, looting, organized crime, insurrection, treason, and harboring illegal aliens.
All of it is part of their morality. To them, these are all justified to advance their agenda.

Like me, you don't agree with these morals, but they are there and they do operate among Democrats.

It is certainly not the morals taught by Jesus Christ. Remember, Democrats are essentially their own religion, they deny Jesus Christ and Christianity. They belong to the Church of No God. To them, the closest thing to God is government.

That is their morality. I abhor it. So do you. I don't blame you.
 
Yup. Once Rudy played his last cards for Trump, losing his BAR license in the process and ruining his reputation Trump had no more use for him and treated him like every other lawyer or contractor who has done work for Trump, by sticking him on his legal bill and costs.
I'm surprised he let Noem and Bondi down so gently - Noem more than Bondi because he gave her another fake job she can cosplay with. Bondi, not so much - the reason - she fumbled the Epstein coverup.
 
I'm surprised he let Noem and Bondi down so gently - Noem more than Bondi because he gave her another fake job she can cosplay with. Bondi, not so much - the reason - she fumbled the Epstein coverup.
No, she was slow-walking prosecution of many crimes. Bondi was Bush-y controlled oppostion. Like Thune.
 
Back
Top