Unconscious? You Know You Wanted It

Status
Not open for further replies.
Onceler said:
Oh - missed this. I thought so.

You did get it wrong, and yes, the posts DO show that you got it wrong. And you've re-posted them so many times....ouch.
Click to expand...

Having a little insomnia issue again Onceler?

I suppose Yurt is better than Beck.

Actually, it's a tough call.
 
Darla said:
Having a little insomnia issue again Onceler?

I suppose Yurt is better than Beck.

Actually, it's a tough call.
Click to expand...

I'm aggravated; my beloved Yanks are about to go down 3-1 to the Rangers.

I'm moving onto "Sons of Anarchy" in a few minutes, though....
 
Darla said:
What an illiterate ignoramus.

That's pulled straight out of your ass.


You fucking idiot.

You dare to come on this thread and post things you invented in your zeal to jerk off on a message board and apologize for a rapist.

...before you began masturbating like the deranged monkey you are.

Try and get your facts straight idiot. This is not about what you think, what it sounds like to you, or most absurdly, what it "smells like" to you.

Read before commenting you incredible moron.
Click to expand...

wow....i'm up against some real intellectuals....the post is half insults...i took out the debate as darla claims she has me on ignore, though she reps me everyday which requires her to "view" my posts and to do so....i factually cannot be on ignore....if darla wants to debate with me instead of just insulting and neg repping....i'm all game....but i don't think she has the courage to do so
 
The real darla lurks beneath the veneer...

I'm DONE...no no really I am done...did you hear me? I am DONE damn it you fucking idiot!!!

DONE...does anyone hear me NOW
 
Darla said:
Having a little insomnia issue again Onceler?

I suppose Yurt is better than Beck.

Actually, it's a tough call.
Click to expand...

how cute...i'm supposedly on ignore, bjut you can't stop talking about me

how about you debate me instead of solely cowardly repping me and talking me about me? i know it takes courage...but even onceler has that courgage.....
 
Onceler said:
I'm aggravated; my beloved Yanks are about to go down 3-1 to the Rangers.

I'm moving onto "Sons of Anarchy" in a few minutes, though....
Click to expand...

LOL

I'll tell you a really dumb secret about me - when I can't sleep I watch HSN and Shopnbc and sometimes I order stuff just like a crazy trailer park person.

:)

Goodnight!
 
Darla said:
Which you would have known if you had bothered to read anything on this thread before you began masturbating like the deranged monkey you are.

Try and get your facts straight idiot. This is not about what you think, what it sounds like to you, or most absurdly, what it "smells like" to you.
Click to expand...


Apple, you BAD, BAD monkey!!!


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciLllSAcF-8"]YouTube - masturbating monkey[/ame]
 
Ice Dancer said:
The real darla lurks beneath the veneer...

I'm DONE...no no really I am done...did you hear me? I am DONE damn it you fucking idiot!!!

DONE...does anyone hear me NOW
Click to expand...

WHAT FVCKING PART OF D-O-N-E ARE YOU HAVING FVCKING DIFFICULTY WITH????

PUT A FVCKING FORK IN IT WILL YA????
 
Darla said:
In fact, The Colorado Independent explained, in an article I linked to, that: "In establishing whether there were grounds to arrest the suspect, Greeley police had the victim phone the suspect from the police station. That call was recorded and entered into evidence. The recording was made without his knowledge, so it can't be used in court."

The tape was not admissable.
Click to expand...

My goodness, you're a thick-headed woman.

It doesn't matter if the confession is admissible in court. My point was if the detective knew 100% a rape took place, heard the guy admit to it, whether admissable in court or not, he would go after the guy KNOWING the guy was guilty.

This is not about what you think, what it sounds like to you, or most absurdly, what it "smells like" to you.
Click to expand...

What it looks like, sounds like and "smells like" is exactly what it's about as far as the detective is concerned. Prosecutions are a judgment call. There is no lack of disgruntled, angry, bitter, baggage-carrying people wanting to make a problem for others. I'm sure you can relate. :)

As for
But that's what the detective wrote in the report. Which you would have known if you had bothered to read anything on this thread before you began masturbating like the deranged monkey you are.
Click to expand...

We've addressed masturbation previously. I would venture to guess your preoccupation with masturbation is due to your excessive use of BOB resulting in masturbation permeating your posts.

Unless it's your intention to let the world know your bed has a permanent funky odor I humbly suggest you utilize a droplet of discretion.

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Darla said:
What an illiterate ignoramus. You have just announced, with this post, that you either did not read the article or any of the posts on this thread except the one which triggered your role-playing sexual stupor, or, you read them and you have the reading comprehension of a dim-witted first grader.

You have made up all of your "facts".

"It's a cake walk IF the confession is real but he knows it just doesn't sound right".

That's pulled straight out of your ass.

In fact, The Colorado Independent explained, in an article I linked to, that: "In establishing whether there were grounds to arrest the suspect, Greeley police had the victim phone the suspect from the police station. That call was recorded and entered into evidence. The recording was made without his knowledge, so it can't be used in court."

The tape was not admissable. That's what's known as a technicality. Surely someone as educated by what occurs on television procedurals as you are, would know that evidence that is deemed not admissable on a legal technicality is not something "that just doesn't sound right".

You fucking idiot.

You dare to come on this thread and post things you invented in your zeal to jerk off on a message board and apologize for a rapist.

Further, your invented belief that the police didn't believe her, is contradicted by this:

"The report, however, suggests that the police did recommend charges. “I advised (the suspect) that I would be requesting a felony summons for sexual assault,” Detective Michael Zeller wrote in the report. "

Once Buck's refusal to prosecute became a political issue, the police of chief denied that this was true, though on what grounds since the newspaper has the actual written report, I would be hard pressed to state. It's obvious that this has become a political hot potato.

But that's what the detective wrote in the report. Which you would have known if you had bothered to read anything on this thread before you began masturbating like the deranged monkey you are.

Try and get your facts straight idiot. This is not about what you think, what it sounds like to you, or most absurdly, what it "smells like" to you.

Read before commenting you incredible moron.
Click to expand...
 
Yurt said:
once again, an attorney can and should take a case if the client wants to pursue it and it is not frivilous and once again, the attorney is not always right...you have never talked about this to any attorney, by contrast i have talked about this issue with numerous attorneys and the vast majority would take the case to court for the client if, after advisement of the slim chances, the client still wanted to take it to court, i know you hate the law and truth, but they are in fact entitled to have their day in court and no amount of whining and ranting from you is going to change that....call me stupid, incompetent all day long but you can not change reality
Click to expand...

No moron. An attorney who thinks the client cannot win based on the evidence should refuse to take the case. They should send the client to an unscrupulous attorney who would charge the client regardless of the merits of their case.

My guess is... someone like YOU.

Answer this Yurt... in this case... WHO pays her attorney's fees if she loses?

i know of many cases where the attorney thought the chances of winning were low and informed the client, but the client wanted to go to court and the client was right....but you would have us all believe that the attorney is always right...talk about stupid....
Click to expand...

Again, you are taking things to the extreme yurt.... No, attorneys are not ALWAYS right... but if the client understands the merits of the case and the evidence and the odds of winning better than the attorney, then the attorney is worthless and should not be practicing.
 
Yurt said:
what if the attorney thought there was little or no chance of winning?

what about in a civil case....if you thought there was little or no chance of success, but the case is not frivilous, and your client wanted to pay you take the case to court...wouuld you? if not, do you think it is unethical, stupid, incompetent etc.... for an attorney to do so?
Click to expand...

you do realize there is a HUGE difference between a CIVIL case and a CRIMINAL case.... don't you?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top