what is a troll

^this what you do everytime you get busted....you run around spazzing that the person is spinning

there is no spin....its either the entire economy or its not, you claimed dixie said so, he did not from what you claim so far he has, all you have is rush and since you set the rules last week that i had to use only republicans in office.....why is it you don't have to abide by your own rules....

see...it is that simple, now stop spazzing and cowboy up

Check the other thread. You have been burned on this, and badly.

Best leave it alone now, Yurtsie....
 
Check the other thread. You have been burned on this, and badly.

Best leave it alone now, Yurtsie....

wow...intellectual dishonesty at its finest

i've already given you rush...

however, last week, you demanded i provide one republican who i have not defended, i gave you palin, but that wasn't good enough, you said it had to be a republican in power....i gave you mccain....then you magically shut up

now, however, you don't have to abide by your own rules and provide a republican in power....your double standard and intellectual dishonesty is amusing
 
he isn't a troll

would you agree that taking someone's username, avatar, signature and posts and representing that you are that person on another board is a troll?

yes or no

One time exception - just because I want you to answer the hero question. I said webbway is a troll. You replied that he isn't.

Now - when someone says that a person announced something, is he making that person out to be a hero?
 
i did say it, i did not remember that. i was wrong. and you're right, that was a long time ago, his posts have gotten worse.

like i said, you only produce posts when you know you have something. unlike you though, i can admit i was wrong.

funny how you refuse to produce posts all the other times. thanks for proving my point about you.
 
i did say it, i did not remember that. i was wrong. and you're right, that was a long time ago, his posts have gotten worse.

like i said, you only produce posts when you know you have something. unlike you though, i can admit i was wrong.

funny how you refuse to produce posts all the other times. thanks for proving my point about you.

Distilled version: "I was wrong but I have to make Onceler seem wronger."
 
i did say it, i did not remember that. i was wrong. and you're right, that was a long time ago, his posts have gotten worse.

like i said, you only produce posts when you know you have something. unlike you though, i can admit i was wrong.

funny how you refuse to produce posts all the other times. thanks for proving my point about you.

Whatever. I said I was making an exception, and you didn't disappoint.
Now, however, onto the question you keep avoiding...
 
Distilled version: "I was wrong but I have to make Onceler seem wronger."

so saying i'm wrong and pointing the fact onceler only links up when he knows he has something, means he is "wronger"?

you're a joke, even when i admit i'm wrong, which onceler claims i never do, it is still not good enough for you.

what a fucking hack.
 
so saying i'm wrong and pointing the fact onceler only links up when he knows he has something, means he is "wronger"?

you're a joke, even when i admit i'm wrong, which onceler claims i never do, it is still not good enough for you.

what a fucking hack.

Christie was 100% correct. I knew that was the response I'd get for finding something, which is why I don't go digging all over the boards every time you contradict yourself. I don't need to show you how crazy you are. It's your problem.
 
Christie was 100% correct. I knew that was the response I'd get for finding something, which is why I don't go digging all over the boards every time you contradict yourself. I don't need to show you how crazy you are. It's your problem.

you're a hack just like her. i admitted i was wrong, and i also pointed out a true statement that you only back up claims when you know you have something. that is not claiming you are more wrong than me. i never said which was wrong was greater.

but i know you are desperate to deflect from all your other false claims.
 
so saying i'm wrong and pointing the fact onceler only links up when he knows he has something, means he is "wronger"?

you're a joke, even when i admit i'm wrong, which onceler claims i never do, it is still not good enough for you.

what a fucking hack.

One thing we have to hand to you. You're an absolute genius at leaving tons of wiggle room in your comments, so you can go either way depending on the response you get. You don't have it in you to just say "I was wrong", and leave it at that.

Were you right? No. Was Onceler right? Yes. Nobody needs to read your contorted explanations of why he really was wrong, even though he was right.

Second to your genius at obfuscation is your talent at antagonizing people just so you can have the last word.
 
One thing we have to hand to you. You're an absolute genius at leaving tons of wiggle room in your comments, so you can go either way depending on the response you get. You don't have it in you to just say "I was wrong", and leave it at that.

Were you right? No. Was Onceler right? Yes. Nobody needs to read your contorted explanations of why he really was wrong, even though he was right.

Second to your genius at obfuscation is your talent at antagonizing people just so you can have the last word.

does onceler always link up in order to back up his claims? or does he rarely do so?
 
Back
Top