Will The Obama Be a One-Term President?

Will The Obama Be a On-Termer?


  • Total voters
    12
Oh yeah...and Ronald Reagan was a dumb cowboy, grade B movie actor, idiot who was going to get us all killed. LOL. Haven't you guys got anything new?

Well, time will tell of course, but it's a weak field. Romney is the likely nominee, and he's an empty suit that the base basically dislikes. Reagan always had the base.
 
Oh yeah...and Ronald Reagan was a dumb cowboy, grade B movie actor, idiot who was going to get us all killed. LOL. Haven't you guys got anything new?

Do you? No fool like an old fool.

By the way, nobody gives half a fuck what you say moron. You are completely irelevant.
 
While I'd agree that Obama looks very vulnerable, the GOP field - just to reiterate - is one of the worst in memory....
Exactly. The only one who stands a chance against Obama is Romney and I would consider voting for him if it wasn't for my vow and if he is not stradled with a far right wing platform.

As a former Rockefeller and Main Street Republican I just can't fucking believe what has happened to the party. How did it become the party of ignorant, frightened and angry red necks?
 
It doesn't matter. He won it and it blows apart your assertion that he's a dissapointment.

ROFLMAO... yeah, you aren't a partisan hack.... Him 'winning' and award for doing NOTHING doesn't blow apart the assertion that he is a disappointment. Not in the least. It instead highlights the fact that there are a lot of idiots out there who wanted Obama to be their messiah and it turns out he was just a community organizer who pretended to be a Senator while in reality he was just campaigning to be campaigner in chief.

I'm sure he is to all right wing ideologues and extremist. I'm sure a competent centrist would be but that's why he's going to win re-election. The majority of Americans are fed up with political extremist. They want people who can get shit done. What has the far right done lately? NOTHING!

He is a disappointment to most independents too. Which is why he is polling so poorly among independents. You are right, Americans are fed up with extremists... which is why a moderate Rep will beat Obama.

The far right is not in power right now. Obama is in the White House and Reid controls the do nothing Senate.
 
More psychological projection from a Bush psycophant. No, unlike you I don't vote based on fanaticism. I vote based on demonstrated ability. The fact is, your messiah blew chunks and was one of the worst Presidents in history and this President has had to waste a large part of his valuable time fixing your messiahs fuck ups. End of argument.
:rofl: What demonstrated ability? He was arguably the least experienced person running in 2008. He hasn't been able to create jobs, end wars and heal the planet like he sold you. Yet you still drink his bath water. Just admit that you're nothing more than a liberal, partisan hack.
 
Do you? No fool like an old fool.

By the way, nobody gives half a fuck what you say moron. You are completely irelevant.

DUNE
ChunkySKnott.jpg
 
Obama will win, by how much depends on the economy. Right now the republicans are ruining the nation in an attempt to regain power. The republicans have failed consistently for 100 years, and yet their message appeals to ideologues of the right and many independent voters. To add to Churchill's comment, ""The best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average [right wing republican] voter." The fact anyone could even consider Bachmann, Perry, Cain, or Santorum as presidential material proves the quote. http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?35351-Republican-Ideology-through-History

"Well, I have been studying the Republican Party for over 12 years at close hand in the Capital of the United States. And by this time, I have discovered where the Republicans stand on most of the major issues." http://www.trumanlibrary.org/publicpapers/index.php?pid=1986

And see my sig.

"Unity in a democracy cannot be produced by mealymouthed political speeches.

Unity on great issues comes only when the voice of the people has been heard so clearly, so strongly, so unmistakably, that no one--not even the second guessers--can doubt what the people mean.

Thomas Jefferson did not seek unity by concealing the real issues between himself and Alexander Hamilton. He made the issues clear, so that the people could reach a decision. And their decision determined that democracy rather than autocracy should prevail in this great country of ours.

Andrew Jackson did not seek unity with the moneymakers in Philadelphia. He made the issues so clear that the people decided to place the control of the money in the Government of the United States, and not in a few private banks.

Abraham Lincoln did not seek unity with Stephen A. Douglas. He made it clear that this Nation could not continue to exist half slave and half free.

Franklin D. Roosevelt, in 1933, did not seek unity with the economic royalists. He proposed the New Deal.

And today, I do not seek unity by concealing the issues between me and the special privilege groups that control the Republican Party.

I never will seek that sort of unity.


Real unity is behind basic principles and concrete programs. Real unity cannot be achieved without a definition of the issues, and a decision by the American people."

Wow! Great stuff. Harry really did give 'em hell. Funny how the right's objectives never change and they have to be beaten back when the economic disparity they create catches up to them. This time it's world wide.

Obama will be reelected even though Citizens United will allow the right to spend billions on propaganda. People are starting to understand the right's plans to starve our govt. and tank the economy in hopes of blaming it on Obama and winning a close election. Pfffftt cat's out of the bag. The reason the poll numbers are what they are is because people want him to be more like Harry.
 
ROFLMAO... yeah, you aren't a partisan hack.... Him 'winning' and award for doing NOTHING doesn't blow apart the assertion that he is a disappointment. Not in the least. It instead highlights the fact that there are a lot of idiots out there who wanted Obama to be their messiah and it turns out he was just a community organizer who pretended to be a Senator while in reality he was just campaigning to be campaigner in chief.



He is a disappointment to most independents too. Which is why he is polling so poorly among independents. You are right, Americans are fed up with extremists... which is why a moderate Rep will beat Obama.

The far right is not in power right now. Obama is in the White House and Reid controls the do nothing Senate.
There's only one moderate Republican running and for the sake of the Republican party I hope he wins cause the future for the Republican party is bleak if it continues to be dominated by backwards looking right wing reactionaries. Romney is the only hope the Repelicans have and I do hope sanity and reason prevails and that he is nominated. If he is....we have a horse race. A left of center moderate vs a right of center moderate both exceptionally talented men and that would be good for the nation. If the Repelicans nominate a right wing ideologue (and the rest of the Repelican field are such) then Obama wins handily.

Even if Romney wins the nomination I see him at a significant disadvantage. I don't think the right wing and evengelical base will show up for a "non-christian" where as Obama has the strategic advantage of incumbency. Romney doesn't have the personal dynamism of a Clinton or the charisma of a Bush to over come this disadvantage easily. The economic situation is a two edged sword for Obama, on the one hand, the poor economic numbers do not bode well for him on the other hand, the people haven't forgotten that it was Repelican lassiez-faire policy which got us into this hole so Repelicans have a substantial credibility gap on the economy. The only Repelican who has even the remotest chance of bridging that credibility gap is Romney as Cain's German housefrau plan "nein, nein, nein!" is a joke and Romney's record speaks for itself. The rest of the field? Forget about it!
 
There's only one moderate Republican running and for the sake of the Republican party I hope he winds cause the future for the Republican party is bleak if it continues to be dominated by backwards looking right wing reactionaries. Romney is the only hope the Repelicans have and I do hope sanity and reason prevails and that he is nominated. If he is....we have a horse race. A left of center moderate vs a right of center moderate both exceptionally talented men and that would be good for the nation. If the Repelicans nominate a right wing ideologue (and the rest of the Repelican field are such) then Obama wins handily.

Even if Romney wins the nomination I see him at a significant disadvantage. I don't think the right wing and evengelical base will show up for a "non-christian" where as Obama has the strategic advantage of incumbency. Romney doesn't have the personal dynamism or charisma of a Clinton to over come this disadvantage easily. The economic situation is a two edged sword for Obama, on the one hand, the poor economic numbers do not bode well for him on the other hand, the people haven't forgotten that it was Repelican lassiez-faire policy which got us into this hole so Repelicans have a substantial credibility gap on the economy. The only Repelican who has even the remotest chance of bridging that credibility gap is Romney as Cain's German housefrau plan "nein, nein, nein!" is a joke. The rest of the field? Forget about it!

Obama is right-of-center and I predict you would not be able to tell the difference between a President Romney and a President Obama.

However, Romney will be beholden to the nutball right, so there goes the courts. The only reason I will be voting for Obama.
 
:rofl: What demonstrated ability? He was arguably the least experienced person running in 2008. He hasn't been able to create jobs, end wars and heal the planet like he sold you. Yet you still drink his bath water. Just admit that you're nothing more than a liberal, partisan hack.
Again more psychological projection. tsk, tsk, tsk.
 
Obama is right-of-center and I predict you would not be able to tell the difference between a President Romney and a President Obama.

However, Romney will be beholden to the nutball right, so there goes the courts. The only reason I will be voting for Obama.

How terrible to get the courts back into the hands of constitutionalists rather than new age socialists. Just awful. Obama is right of center?????? Oh my God.
 
It's always a chuckle with the connie cons. They argue all day & night that Obama is "just like Bush," but when you suggest that he's not a communist, they express incredulity.

So, I guess Bush was a commie...
 
You guys are so far to the right you can't see the center. Don't you ever get tired of being toadies for the same fascist ideology that got the U.S. into this mess? You must be part of the wealthy 1% and don't give a damn about America. A democratic country is not a corporation and can't be run the same way.
 
You guys are so far to the right you can't see the center. Don't you ever get tired of being toadies for the same fascist ideology that got the U.S. into this mess? You must be part of the wealthy 1% and don't give a damn about America. A democratic country is not a corporation and can't be run the same way.
You guys are so far to the left you can't see the center. Don't you ever get tired of being toadies for the same fascist ideology that got the U.S. into this mess? You must be part of the 50% who don't pay taxes and don't give a damn about America. A free capitalist society is not a day care center and can't be run the same way.
 
LOL! a free capitalist society! LOL! Your monopolistic form of trade has destroyed capitalism and every 80 yrs or so the people of this country have to save capitalism from you. If you sit by the pool and live off of a dividend check from invested money you are a capitalist, if you work for a living in a capitalistic system you are not a capitalist you are a worker. Get a grip. You've been lied to. Every time Hannity or the Limbaugh junkie says 'we' or 'the people' they don't mean you, they mean the 1% who have brainwashed you.
 
Back
Top