There's definitely been some skin-pulling on her. She used to look cute and normal.
![]()
That was her????????? OMG! Why do they do it to themselves?????? Do they really think they look better?
There's definitely been some skin-pulling on her. She used to look cute and normal.
![]()
That was her????????? OMG! Why do they do it to themselves?????? Do they really think they look better?
has well-articulated and thought out answers to the issues and solutions to the problems
Unless a reporter asks him a "trick question" in which case he warns if anyone reports it he'll deny saying what he admitted he said.
I don't know if that's considered a "thought out" answer or a "far out" answer or an "out-of-this-world" answer.
That was her????????? OMG! Why do they do it to themselves?????? Do they really think they look better?
So what is the purpose of "gotcha" questions other than to embarass the candidate rather than find out positions to inform the American people?
It wasn't a "gotcha" question. Newt rambled on about social programming concerning a Repub suggestion regarding medical care. When the shit hit the fan he backtracked and blamed the interviewer for asking a gotcha question. It had nothing to do with a gotcha question. The interviewer just wanted to know his position on medical care.
I think it was the next day he ran into a Republican supporter who said, "You're an embarrassment to the party. Why don't you get out before you make a bigger fool of yourself."
Here's the video.
And don't forget I was responding to Dixie’s comment, msg 229, “(Newt) has well-articulated and thought out answers to the issues and solutions to the problem.”
It's apparent Newt has neither.
Republicans are always such cry babies, it is the excuse they use every time they look bad in an interview! The mean old press!
Well, yeah, I think you'll probably see a lot of that, since the liberals have let it be known they intend to lie, distort, slander, or whatever it takes. I happen to think this might be where someone like Newt has an advantage over, say a Cain or even Romney, Newt can spin it right back around and thwack the pinhead reporter with his own question, whereas the others might not know how to respond appropriately.
Unless the interviewer is Hannity or O'Reilly and then they are big hateful poopy pants. The phoney outrage from you and apple is quite amusing.
What are you talking about? He didn't respond appropriately. After accusing the reporter of asking a gotcha question he phoned Paul to apologise for his stupid answer. Obviously, the guy can't think on his feet or sitting on his butt.
He explained his answer, and I think most people who would consider voting for him, can accept it. You weren't ever considering voting for Newt, so it really doesn't matter what you think he did, or how you think he handled it, now does it? Obviously, the guy knows well enough how to explain what he said, because he's leading by 21% in the polls right now. I know that's tough to deal with, Sally, but it looks like that's what you're going to have to do.
Sorry!
I disagree. Newt's response here was well thought out, articulate and factually correct. It was when he was confronted by a wing nut on the extreme and started getting pressure from the wingnut club that he started back tracking. I pretty much agreed with his comment here. It just shows you how sad the Repelican party has become and how the tail is wagging the dog now.It wasn't a "gotcha" question. Newt rambled on about social programming concerning a Repub suggestion regarding medical care. When the shit hit the fan he backtracked and blamed the interviewer for asking a gotcha question. It had nothing to do with a gotcha question. The interviewer just wanted to know his position on medical care.
I think it was the next day he ran into a Republican supporter who said, "You're an embarrassment to the party. Why don't you get out before you make a bigger fool of yourself."
Here's the video.
And don't forget I was responding to Dixie’s comment, msg 229, “(Newt) has well-articulated and thought out answers to the issues and solutions to the problem.”
It's apparent Newt has neither.
I'm sure the American people will have found Newt quite amusing long before voting day.
Well, yeah, I think you'll probably see a lot of that, since the liberals have let it be known they intend to lie, distort, slander, or whatever it takes. I happen to think this might be where someone like Newt has an advantage over, say a Cain or even Romney, Newt can spin it right back around and thwack the pinhead reporter with his own question, whereas the others might not know how to respond appropriately.
I remember Carter and Reagan very well and how the left demonized and ridiculed Reagan. He was a dumb grade B movie actor and a hick cowboy who was going to get us all killed. I've heard it all before. Obama is worse than Carter and the people are hurting. Demonizing your opponent is all you have. Your pals have failed.
I disagree. Newt's response here was well thought out, articulate and factually correct. It was when he was confronted by a wing nut on the extreme and started getting pressure from the wingnut club that he started back tracking. I pretty much agreed with his comment here. It just shows you how sad the Repelican party has become and how the tail is wagging the dog now.
I personally don't give that much of a rats ass about Newts personal failings and hypocrisy. I'm going to vote for a chief executive. Not mother Theresa or the Pope. I'm going to vote based on the candidates ideas and ability to get shit done and govern affectively and competently. I felt that way about Clinton and I fell that way about Newt. I could give a shit less about cum stained dresses or expense accounts at Tiffany's.
I remember Carter and Reagan very well and how the left demonized and ridiculed Reagan. He was a dumb grade B movie actor and a hick cowboy who was going to get us all killed. I've heard it all before. Obama is worse than Carter and the people are hurting. Demonizing your opponent is all you have. Your pals have failed.
I disagree. Newt's response here was well thought out, articulate and factually correct. It was when he was confronted by a wing nut on the extreme and started getting pressure from the wingnut club that he started back tracking. I pretty much agreed with his comment here. It just shows you how sad the Repelican party has become and how the tail is wagging the dog now.
I personally don't give that much of a rats ass about Newts personal failings and hypocrisy. I'm going to vote for a chief executive. Not mother Theresa or the Pope. I'm going to vote based on the candidates ideas and ability to get shit done and govern affectively and competently. I felt that way about Clinton and I fell that way about Newt. I could give a shit less about cum stained dresses or expense accounts at Tiffany's.