If the issue were whether to extend the payroll tax cut for a year versus two months, maybe Gingrich would have a point. But that's not the issue. The issue is what concessions Republicans can extract in exchange for doing something they claim to want to do anyway.
If the Democrats want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year and the Republicans want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year, the payroll tax cut would be extended for a year. But the Republicans don't want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year. They only want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year if, in exchange the Democrats made a whole host of policy concessions that the Democrats don't want to agree to. Having been called on their bullshit, they now resort to claiming that the issue is the length of the payroll tax cut int he hopes that no one will notice. Naturally, PMP, Damo and the rest oblige accordingly.
If the Democrats want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year and the Republicans want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year, the payroll tax cut would be extended for a year. But the Republicans don't want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year. They only want to extend the payroll tax cut for a year if, in exchange the Democrats made a whole host of policy concessions that the Democrats don't want to agree to. Having been called on their bullshit, they now resort to claiming that the issue is the length of the payroll tax cut int he hopes that no one will notice. Naturally, PMP, Damo and the rest oblige accordingly.