Obama, A Damn Liar

So you fully support the President in circumventing the Senate in such a manner, essentially any weekend the President can appoint anyone he or she wants. Good to know.


Unless you explain to me how the length of time matters, I don't see how a recess appointment during a three day recess is any different from a recess appointment during a two week recess.

And spare me the "circumventing the Senate" bullshit. The Republicans have turned the Senate into a supermajoritarian body for pretty much all Senate business. Under the circumstances, where the Republicans have resorted to unprecedented tactics to block everything, the President taking unprecedented actions in response shouldn't be surprising.

Moreover, the NLRB and the CFPB cannot legally operate at present and the President is barred from faithfully executing the law. I don't see using constitutional means to achieve constitutional requirements as problematic. I think recess appointments as a general matter are a bad idea, but I don't think they should be prohibited (as the House has tried to achieve).
 
So you fully support the President in circumventing the Senate in such a manner, essentially any weekend the President can appoint anyone he or she wants. Good to know.

So when did weekends become three days long?

Oh hyperbole...how you have been missed!
 
I think you're a moron and that you think what you posted is part of the U.S. Constitution.

you are truly retarded. i would have thought adding this:

United Federation of States

would have been your first clue i was fucking with you. like i said before, you have no sense of humor. you actually thought i was serious. my goodness man.....step outside and if the air clean, take a deep breath and relax.

your buddy,

yurt
 
Unless you explain to me how the length of time matters, I don't see how a recess appointment during a three day recess is any different from a recess appointment during a two week recess.

And spare me the "circumventing the Senate" bullshit. The Republicans have turned the Senate into a supermajoritarian body for pretty much all Senate business. Under the circumstances, where the Republicans have resorted to unprecedented tactics to block everything, the President taking unprecedented actions in response shouldn't be surprising.

Moreover, the NLRB and the CFPB cannot legally operate at present and the President is barred from faithfully executing the law. I don't see using constitutional means to achieve constitutional requirements as problematic. I think recess appointments as a general matter are a bad idea, but I don't think they should be prohibited (as the House has tried to achieve).

LMAO... so Again.... did your precious master object to the DEMOCRATS using the same methods to block Bush's appointments to the NLRB? Nope... he went right along with it.

Again... read the piece I linked to. It may help you understand. Obama is absolutely circumventing the Senate. But you keep on worshiping your master. Keep your head firmly planted up his ass. You seem to like the stench.
 
So when did weekends become three days long?

Oh hyperbole...how you have been missed!

According to Dung, there is no difference between three minutes/three days/three weeks. So by Dung's definition, the President can appoint anyone he/she wants whenever he/she wants.
 
According to Dung, there is no difference between three minutes/three days/three weeks. So by Dung's definition, the President can appoint anyone he/she wants whenever he/she wants.


I said the Constitution does not specify the period of time required for the Senate to be in recess for the President to exercise his recess appointment powers. Unless you can show me otherwise, under the Constitution the length of the recess is irrelevant.
 
Then open my eyes.

Show me the work Congressional Republicans have accomplished over the past 10 days.

nope. according to YOU, since you are challenging me, it is up to YOU to prove i'm wrong.

don't you just hate it when your hackery comes back and kicks you in the ass?

and seriously...it is plain stupid to claim they have done nothing for the past 10 days.
 
LMAO... so Again.... did your precious master object to the DEMOCRATS using the same methods to block Bush's appointments to the NLRB? Nope... he went right along with it.

You'd have a point if Bush made recess appointments during pro forma sessions and Obama objected to it. But he didn't.


Again... read the piece I linked to. It may help you understand. Obama is absolutely circumventing the Senate. But you keep on worshiping your master. Keep your head firmly planted up his ass. You seem to like the stench.

Give me a fucking break. He isn't circumventing the Senate. He nominated people. The Republicans filibustered them (and everything else) and he exercised his recess appointment powers. Unless and until the filibuster is done away with, that's the only way to get shit done.
 
nope. according to YOU, since you are challenging me, it is up to YOU to prove i'm wrong.

don't you just hate it when your hackery comes back and kicks you in the ass?

and seriously...it is plain stupid to claim they have done nothing for the past 10 days.

What a surprise...the Yurtard does exactly the same thing he spends entire threads whining about...

Just keep this exchange in mind next time you demand that I corroborate something...
 
What a surprise...the Yurtard does exactly the same thing he spends entire threads whining about...

Just keep this exchange in mind next time you demand that I corroborate something...

nope, not whining. just holding YOU to your own demands.

obviously you do not practice what you preach.

whiny hypocrite.
 
Just living down to the standard set by YOU time and again.

just so we are clear:

1. you demand or ask that someone who challenges a source/opinion/whatever produce proof or bear the burden of proof. you have, in the past, stated that if someone challenges a claim, it is up to the challenger to prove the claim wrong.

2. i have never said the challenger bears the burden.

3. you have.

4. thus, you are not "living down" to any standards i "created"

5. another zappa lie proven.
 
You'd have a point if Bush made recess appointments during pro forma sessions and Obama objected to it. But he didn't.

My point dear lil hack is that Obama went along with the VERY SAME TECHNIQUE HE IS NOW BITCHING ABOUT.

Give me a fucking break. He isn't circumventing the Senate. He nominated people. The Republicans filibustered them (and everything else) and he exercised his recess appointment powers. Unless and until the filibuster is done away with, that's the only way to get shit done.

So he circumvented the Senate because he couldn't force them to accept who he wanted. Understood.

You should go to DC and explain what you know to the lawyers there who think this is not legal. They would be grateful to have such a knowledgeable person like you on hand.

Again, try reading the piece I linked to... you might actually learn something.
 
just so we are clear:

1. you demand or ask that someone who challenges a source/opinion/whatever produce proof or bear the burden of proof. you have, in the past, stated that if someone challenges a claim, it is up to the challenger to prove the claim wrong.

2. i have never said the challenger bears the burden.

3. you have.

4. thus, you are not "living down" to any standards i "created"

5. another zappa lie proven.

More patented horseshit from the Supreme Douchebag...
 
Back
Top