State's Rights

Dude says it was "self-defense"... I guess he was afraid he'd be infected with gay if he allowed him to deliver the Skittles to his brother so he could "taste the rainbow"...

I still can't understand what the frick is keeping these people from arresting this guy.
 
All of your posts, including this one, prove my OP.

I think it's hysterical you don't get that, and I love that SF won't touch your posts. He gets it I bet.

I haven't read all the posts on the thread. Just the moronic OP where you try to link this asshole to Libertarians all because you have no fucking clue what Libertarians are.
 
And it's all on tape, no less. That's one of the most chilling tapes I've heard in a long time - there is no real defense for his words or actions, and what it all lead to...

Not even kidding. Is it because the Chief of police has the last name of Zimmerman? Is this a family thing?
 
Dude says it was "self-defense"... I guess he was afraid he'd be infected with gay if he allowed him to deliver the Skittles to his brother so he could "taste the rainbow"...

I still can't understand what the frick is keeping these people from arresting this guy.

Agreed, he should have been arrested a long time ago. He called 911, was told by the operator to NOT follow the kid, yet he did and the kid was killed as a result. To proclaim this self defense or even pretend it is in absurd.
 
Not even kidding. Is it because the Chief of police has the last name of Zimmerman? Is this a family thing?

Chiefs name is Lee. Zimmerman also had a battery charge against a police office dropped for some reason. The guy has a history of violence and yet no arrest.
 
It is not surprising that you are unable to grasp the simple point. WHO RUNS SANFORD? Democrats or Republicans?

If the city is a Democratic precinct, it has over 50% of the population that is Black or Hispanic, another 22% that is white women.... WHO is electing these racists in the police department that called this 'self defense???

How could Lee get elected?

Oh, I see, you as usual couldn't grasp the point. This is about state's rights vs a strong federal government, and why blacks, and to a lesser extent women (many white women will vote in racial rather than gender solidarity) have historically supported a strong federal government over state's rights.

This has absolutely nothing to do with your post, and you attempt at diversion.
 
Oh, I see, you as usual couldn't grasp the point. This is about state's rights vs a strong federal government, and why blacks, and to a lesser extent women (many white women will vote in racial rather than gender solidarity) have historically supported a strong federal government over state's rights.

This has absolutely nothing to do with your post, and you attempt at diversion.

It's pretty simple math...
 
I haven't read all the posts on the thread. Just the moronic OP where you try to link this asshole to Libertarians all because you have no fucking clue what Libertarians are.

State's rights and a very limited central government are a part of the Libertarian ideology as exposed right here by STY who, right in lockstep, is arguing that the fed has no jurisdiction in this case.
 
So Libertarians do not believe in a greatly shrunken federal government and they do not support state's rights?
Would you ask an impotent man for advice on how to be a good lover? Probably not.

Then why would you care what anyone as politically impotent as a libertarian has to say about politics?
 
It's weird how it's mostly white males who cry about state's rights, and who also tend to join the Libertarian party, the party that loves sausage - but not browned. Why they can't attract women is no mystery - cause hey, bitches be crazy! But their inability to attract black men has long been the rubik's cube of politics. No one can figure it out!

I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that in the year 2012, a black male can still be lynched in this country and not face state murder charges.

DOJ, FBI Opens Investigation Of Trayvon Martin Death

Federal authorities have opened a formal investigation into the death of Trayvon Martin, an unarmed 17-year-old black teenager shot by a neighborhood watch captain in Sanford, Florida. DOJ's full statement.

Libertarians like to quote Jefferson to oppose the federal government and Hamilton to oppose democracy. You can't do this.
 
Local authorities weren't investigating or filing charges because they believed it was self-defense. Sure, a guy with a gun defending himself against a kid with Skittles. Imagine if it had been a black self-designated neighborhood watchman killing a white kid.
Trust me this isn't going to end with Zimmerman. Heads will roll at the local police dept for making such an asinine decision.
 
Would you ask an impotent man for advice on how to be a good lover? Probably not.

Then why would you care what anyone as politically impotent as a libertarian has to say about politics?

Every non-libertarian needs an excuse for why, in America, they choose to practice a brand of politics which does not defend freedom or promote liberty to the extent that libertarians do.
 
I don't. He was found "suspicious" precisely because he was black in a white, gated, neighborhood.

And then, his murder was not prosecuted, because he was black.
Ahh now the prosecution part you have a point about. I'm reasonably sure race entered into whatever excuse Zimmerman has for a thought process. I'm also reasonably sure I'm correct that he's a moron with a gun and a power trip.

I honestly don't know who I'm more pissed off at. Zimmerman for killing this poor kid or the morons in the local PD who didn't arrest his stupid ass.
 
While I don't believe I am "ranting nonsensically" this case did make me angry.

Why didn't it anger you?

Why do you assume it didn't anger me? It does. The asshole should be in jail. Period.

But that doesn't give you license to slander Libertarians and pretend that they support the actions (or rather inaction) of this police department (which lies in a heavily democratic precinct by the way).
 
Oh, I see, you as usual couldn't grasp the point. This is about state's rights vs a strong federal government, and why blacks, and to a lesser extent women (many white women will vote in racial rather than gender solidarity) have historically supported a strong federal government over state's rights.

This has absolutely nothing to do with your post, and you attempt at diversion.

Again, the point you cannot grasp is that this racist behavior occurred in a heavily Democratic precinct. The point you cannot grasp is that Libertarians do not oppose ALL Federal powers. The point you cannot grasp is that you have NO FUCKING IDEA what Libertarians support.
 
Back
Top