Obama got Osama

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
If you want to not include exporting dollars to a foreign country, you shouldn't have stated the two concepts in the same sentence.

lmao... ok dune... sorry that you liberals are so jealous of the successful people that you are going to go full faux outrage over this. You do keep on stomping your feet on this issue just like your master.

Obama is looking petty and weak every time he does it. I am sure you will be more successful than him in doing the same.
 
lmao... ok dune... sorry that you liberals are so jealous of the successful people that you are going to go full faux outrage over this. You do keep on stomping your feet on this issue just like your master.

Obama is looking petty and weak every time he does it. I am sure you will be more successful than him in doing the same.

As I am sure Rommney will lose again, regardless of your lies and deception.
 
LMAO... you are quite desperate. Romney is doing nothing. He is currently leaving his money in a Swiss bank account. Just as those families are just leaving money in the family trust. They are both tax havens.

Unless you can show that Romney opened this Swiss bank account and put millions in it prior to Switzerland becoming a tax haven state, those aren't the same thing. The trusts existed prior to the so-called "tax haven" status. That's not true of Romney's Swiss bank account or his various other offshore investments.


You are the idiots that are proclaiming that Romney is somehow unpatriotic for having a foreign bank account. You are the idiots that proclaimed 'enriching foreigners' was unpatriotic. Let me guess, it is about the amount of money Romney has overseas isn't it? You are waging yet another class warfare campaign... damn those evilz rich people.

I'm not proclaiming anything other than the fact that Mitt Romney has elected to invest in such a way that the rate of tax he pays on his tens of millions of dollars of income is shockingly low. Again, it's an issue of the manner in which Mitt earned his money and the uses to which he has put it.

I don't know why you actually give a shit. We disagree about it. You think it's perfectly fine for Mitt Romney to use tax havens to avoid taxation. That's fine. for you to think that. I happen to disagree.
 
Obama stopped Bin Laden. Bush sent his family members back to Saudi Arabia without allowing the F.B.I. to question them.
Draw your own conclusions shill boy.

My conclusion is that you are quite retarded. The above still has nothing to do with my comments.
 
Unless you can show that Romney opened this Swiss bank account and put millions in it prior to Switzerland becoming a tax haven state, those aren't the same thing. The trusts existed prior to the so-called "tax haven" status. That's not true of Romney's Swiss bank account or his various other offshore investments.

Not saying they are identical moron. I am saying they are both tax havens. Yet you bitch about one, yet are fine with the other.


I'm not proclaiming anything other than the fact that Mitt Romney has elected to invest in such a way that the rate of tax he pays on his tens of millions of dollars of income is shockingly low. Again, it's an issue of the manner in which Mitt earned his money and the uses to which he has put it.

LMAO... so you are upset that Mitt follows the tax code. Ok. So did Obama (despite his proclamation that he should pay more). You are simply jealous that Mitt was successful. I get it. No need to create all this faux outrage.
 
My conclusion is that you are quite retarded. The above still has nothing to do with my comments.

It has everything to do with your comments, Bush aided and abetted Bin Laden's escape, then said he was irrelevent. Obama stalked and killed the guy, and you insist that is meaningless, whereas I disagree and say your comments are meaningless.
 
What lies dune?

Lie #1. sorry that you liberals are so jealous of the successful people that you are going to go full faux outrage over this
lie#2. You do keep on stomping your feet on this issue just like your master.
lie#3.Obama is looking petty and weak every time he does it.
lie#4.I am sure you will be more successful than him in doing the same.
 
Not saying they are identical moron. I am saying they are both tax havens. Yet you bitch about one, yet are fine with the other.

No, you are saying that leaving money in a tax exempt trust is the same thing as investing in tax havens. I think those are two different things.


LMAO... so you are upset that Mitt follows the tax code. Ok. So did Obama (despite his proclamation that he should pay more). You are simply jealous that Mitt was successful. I get it. No need to create all this faux outrage.

Can't debate the substance so you resort to "you're just jealous." And people say that liberals resort to emotion-based arguments. Hilarious.
 
Well, ftr, I was against Obama being made CEO of General Motors.

Back when that happened.

What's that you say? It never happened?

Oh, well, still...

LMAO... those are not the jobs I was referring to... though Government motors is indeed outsourcing now, which is indeed a slap in the face to tax payers who have yet to see GM repay their TARP money.

The jobs Obama and most Dem leaders continue to outsource are those of our oil and nat gas industries. You see, Obama and the Dems have more faith in the environmental controls of countries like Iran and Venezuela than they do of the US. They force billions upon billions of US dollars to go out of our economy to enrich other nations (many of whom are not fans of the US). But we shall continue ignoring those jobs being outsourced... right? That is completely patriotic right?
 
LMAO... those are not the jobs I was referring to... though Government motors is indeed outsourcing now, which is indeed a slap in the face to tax payers who have yet to see GM repay their TARP money.

The jobs Obama and most Dem leaders continue to outsource are those of our oil and nat gas industries. You see, Obama and the Dems have more faith in the environmental controls of countries like Iran and Venezuela than they do of the US. They force billions upon billions of US dollars to go out of our economy to enrich other nations (many of whom are not fans of the US). But we shall continue ignoring those jobs being outsourced... right? That is completely patriotic right?

Talk about fucking lies.
 
No, you are saying that leaving money in a tax exempt trust is the same thing as investing in tax havens. I think those are two different things.

They are different, but they have the same end result. Money is protected from taxation by the US government.

Can't debate the substance so you resort to "you're just jealous." And people say that liberals resort to emotion-based arguments. Hilarious.

Hilarious. The above coming from 'I asked your opinion and then called you a liar for giving one I didn't like'. Truly hilarious.

You are outraged that Mitt has a bank account, we get it. It is truly abhorrent of him. Really. I am stomping my feet with you now.
 
Lie #1. sorry that you liberals are so jealous of the successful people that you are going to go full faux outrage over this

Not a lie Dune... it is happening on this very thread.

lie#2. You do keep on stomping your feet on this issue just like your master.

Not a lie Dune... it is happening on this very thread.

lie#3.Obama is looking petty and weak every time he does it.

Not a lie dune. That is an opinion.

lie#4.I am sure you will be more successful than him in doing the same.

ok... that was a lie... I don't really believe you will be successful.
 
Not a lie Dune... it is happening on this very thread.



Not a lie Dune... it is happening on this very thread.



Not a lie dune. That is an opinion.



ok... that was a lie... I don't really believe you will be successful.

Wrong, wrong, wrong, and still wrong.
 
Has this thread devolved into idle chat because I have failed to comment?
Well, please allow me to bring the thread back to the OP and weigh in.

Credit where credit is due. Obama certainly did not come up with the plan to get Osama, the strategic plan itself, actually came from an Israeli General and was shared with our special ops back during the Reagan administration. SEALS have been routinely practicing the maneuvers for years. All of the training for the operation, was funded with money Obama and democrats objected to spending and sought to cut from the budget, and are still moaning about needing to be cut from the budget.

Now, like I said, credit where credit is due, Obama did have a few options available, and he chose the one he chose, which did have some pretty huge down-sides. It did take him roughly 16 hrs. to figure out which option, but like I said, credit where credit is due, he made the call. I think he deserves credit for at least making A call. One of his options was to do nothing and wait until it is too late... (that's what he does everywhere else, it seems) so he could have done that here and he didn't, he deserves credit for that.
 
Has this thread devolved into idle chat because I have failed to comment?
Well, please allow me to bring the thread back to the OP and weigh in.

Credit where credit is due. Obama certainly did not come up with the plan to get Osama, the strategic plan itself, actually came from an Israeli General and was shared with our special ops back during the Reagan administration. SEALS have been routinely practicing the maneuvers for years. All of the training for the operation, was funded with money Obama and democrats objected to spending and sought to cut from the budget, and are still moaning about needing to be cut from the budget.

Now, like I said, credit where credit is due, Obama did have a few options available, and he chose the one he chose, which did have some pretty huge down-sides. It did take him roughly 16 hrs. to figure out which option, but like I said, credit where credit is due, he made the call. I think he deserves credit for at least making A call. One of his options was to do nothing and wait until it is too late... (that's what he does everywhere else, it seems) so he could have done that here and he didn't, he deserves credit for that.

This has GOT to be a leading nominee for "Most grudging, reluctant & backhanded credit given" of all time, on any message board, anywhere.
 
It was the Reagan Hologram responsible for it all!

Wait until you see what happens when he gives the keynote at the 2012 R convention! Iran is going to surrender right there!

You guys think I'm kidding, but you'll see. Not only that, but 10 will get you 20 that Ronald Reagan gets elected president again in 2016 once they have this hologram technology all perfected.
 
Back
Top