Nope. That is a lie. It's not unfunded at all. What are you even talking about?
10 myths about govt debt - Professor Anthony Davies
- Thread starter Celticguy
- Start date
Nope. That is a lie. It's not unfunded at all. What are you even talking about?
Like, who, specifically?
Who has said they have no confidence in the US dollar, other than you?
Stupid people, sure.
People who don't know what they're talking about, sure.
Idiots and long haul COVID brain foggers, sure.
How so?
Not according to the Supreme Court's 1937 decision: https://www.ssa.gov/history/court.html
You just make shit up as you go, don't you?
Your strategy on JPP (and probably elsewhere) is to spam the threads with as much false information as you can, and then claim victory when not every single lie you told is countered.
Your volume of lies is how you keep the grift going.
Into the Night
Verified User
The interest on the debt of $0.422 trillion, and the current debt is approx $30 trillion. None of this has anything to do with unfunded liabilities.
Into the Night
Verified User
You are making up numbers again. Argument from randU fallacy.
Argument from randU fallacy.
Denial of logic. Trolling. No argument presented.
Into the Night
Verified User
Random phrase. No apparent coherency. Infrastructure is not revenue or debt.
Into the Night
Verified User
Since you do not understand the concept of an unfunded liability and have closed your mind due to bulverism, there's no point my explaining it to you. Go learn this stuff yourself.
Into the Night
Verified User
RQAA.
Into the Night
Verified User
Into the Night
Verified User
Denial of history. Insult fallacies. Trolling. No argument presented.
Into the Night
Verified User
RQAA
Into the Night
Verified User
The Supreme Court has no authority to change the Constitution.
Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself again.
Inversion fallacy.
Inversion fallacy.
False authority fallacy. Trolling. No argument presented.
it does because the entitlements are requiring money from those unfunded liabilities on top of no longer having funds to loan the govt.
You have a severely warped view of what is actually happening. :headscratch:
Oh no! The world is coming to an end??!!!
There's much more to it than that. They distrusted the population which also played a role in their incredibly intelligent decisions about Presidential elections.
While the U.S. Constitution is frequently lauded as a hallmark in democratic government, the document actually reflects significant distrust of democracy. When the Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution, they built a republican form of government that was meant to limit the excesses of democracy. Safeguards included institutions like the electoral college, the Senate, checks and balances, and unelected courts.
Electoral College
In a democracy, voters would directly elect the country's leader on a one-person, one-vote system. The U.S. Constitution, however, established the electoral college for selecting the president. The Founding Fathers did this primarily out of distrust for majoritarian democracies. At the time the Constitution was written, the 13 American states were vastly different from each other both in size and in culture. It was difficult for a citizen of Massachusetts, for example, to understand a presidential candidate from South Carolina. As such, the Founders feared that if the president were directly elected, voters would simply vote for a "favorite son," a candidate from their home state. This fragmented process would lead to a consistent victory from someone from a large state. To mitigate this problem, the Founders created the electoral college, which allowed each state to choose a certain number of electors -- in a process each state determined on its own -- to select the president. While this process has changed slightly since, the same basic premise -- that a direct election wouldn't work -- still remains.
https://www.theclassroom.com/features-constitution-distrust-democracy-20581.html
There absolutely is. They are typically retirement programs. Left unfunded, they become debt bombs.
^The definition of stupid.
Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.