11 USC 110.20(b) and 11 USC 110.20(g)

So if it was a joke, explain the joke.

If you lack the intelligence to get it, discussing it with you will not suffice. You first need a brain to get it. That leaves you out.

Damned funny speech:

Of course, if you're a leftist moron, you call this collusion. :rofl2:
 
Guess what Summer's Eve, you're not a lawyer.

You just play one on the internet.

He is not playing one very well... he is using some idiotic persons evaluation, not the plain wording of the statute.

The alt right cry babying along. They can't argue it because they look more and more stupid.

The Alt Right Trump cels and cucks simply can't take what they try to limp wristedly dish. :cool:

They cant explain how this is not a crime.

:lolup:A brain dead lying liberal circle jerk. :rofl2: Hey asshat, you can't explain how it is a crime. Get your head out of your asshole and get some air to that tiny brain of yours.
 
No, but if it is determined to be a foreign nationalist offering, you dont have the meeting, and you dont email your excitement about attaining the information. Instead, you call the FBI.

Pure unadulterated bullshit; where is it not legal to meet with Russia citizens you dullard? Damn you are one goofy dumb idiot. Judges must laugh you out of their courtrooms with moronic arguments like these.
 
The 33,000 emails in question were ALREADY deleted by Hillary's henchmen and wiped clean with bleach bit. When President Trump made that crack, there was no server to hack. There were no emails to delete.

What President then candidate Trump was referring to at the time was the concern that Hillary's server was unsecured and was likely hacked. Trump was merely saying that if Russia had the 33,000 emails that Hillary never turned over they would be rewarded by the press if they turned them over.

Can't believe you needed that explained to you.

But the only people who knew that were the DNC and the FBI. Trump didn't know that. So the joke doesn't make sense.

:lolup:This is why you don't try to have a dialogue with a willful idiot. :rofl2:
 
Got to admit "truthie" sure goes out of his way employing nothing but the personal crapola in his attempts to defend the Donald, as I said before, when coupled with the lack of content it is like the towel hitting the canvas
 
Something that makes me laugh about all of this is that not one democrat ever questions whether there is “dirt” on Hillary

You never hear a JPP liberal saying “there couldn’t possibly be dirt on Hillary. She is the cleanest politician ever”

No they take it as an article of faith that she is dirty

That is because they are deliberately dishonest.
 
Got to admit "truthie" sure goes out of his way employing nothing but the personal crapola in his attempts to defend the Donald, as I said before, when coupled with the lack of content it is like the towel hitting the canvas

Once again I have to explain it to you because you're a dishonest idiot; I don't defend Trump. I defend the TRUTH. You're incapable of comprehend the truth because you are a pathological lying liberal dunce.
 
Once again I have to explain it to you because you're a dishonest idiot; I don't defend Trump. I defend the TRUTH. You're incapable of comprehend the truth because you are a pathological lying liberal dunce.

That simple and truthful concept escapes way too many on this board. Well said.
 
Mueller's batting average as of today when facing The Donald: -0- fer. :laugh: If there was any concrete evidence of anything......with the deep state leaking classified information like a sieve....it would have already been front page news everywhere. Keep hoping in one hand and defecating in the other....see which one gets filled faster. ;)
 

Why not?

By definition they are a foreign national. They are not US Citizens. They are giving material help to a candidate for office. It seems to me they would be breaking the law.

Of course you don't think so because they would be helping a democrat and anything a democrat does is OK by you right Jarod? Come on. For once in your miserable JPP life be honest
 
Something that makes me laugh about all of this is that not one democrat ever questions whether there is “dirt” on Hillary

You never hear a JPP liberal saying “there couldn’t possibly be dirt on Hillary. She is the cleanest politician ever”

No they take it as an article of faith that she is dirty

Wrong, Trumptard.

It's simply a matter of the right having constantly accused Hillary of being involved in criminal activity for so many years, to the fucking absurd level of murder, and after countless hours and tax dollars wasted investigating her, not one shred of credible, believable evidence to charge her with so much as a misdemeanor, has ever been found or come to light.

The truth is,we just find you drooling, knuckle-dragging goofballs entertaining, so we just let your nonsense go in one ear and out the other. We just tune your Hillary hatred out like some repetitive noise in the street in front of the house or a dog barking on the next block.

Means nothing.

Like you.
 
Truth Detector said:
tdignore456.png

Keep wasting your already worthless time, retard boy.

I don't see one childish thing your juvenile ass posts here.

:fu:
 
Back
Top